Enoch Gaver, 21, was killed in the fight in the town of Cottonwood, and suspect David Gaver, 28, was shot in the stomach and taken into custody. Police Sergeant Jeremy Daniels was hit in the leg by a bullet fired during the melee.
Enoch Gaver, 21, was killed in the fight in the town of Cottonwood, and suspect David Gaver, 28, was shot in the stomach and taken into custody. Police Sergeant Jeremy Daniels was hit in the leg by a bullet fired during the melee.
Enoch Gaver, 21, was killed in the fight in the town of Cottonwood, and suspect David Gaver, 28, was shot in the stomach and taken into custody. Police Sergeant Jeremy Daniels was hit in the leg by a bullet fired during the melee.
Enoch Gaver, 21, was killed in the fight in the town of Cottonwood, and suspect David Gaver, 28, was shot in the stomach and taken into custody. Police Sergeant Jeremy Daniels was hit in the leg by a bullet fired during the melee.
Of course, ilsp, the entire point of your post (the bolded statement to compare the treatment by the police in general in the two situations) is completely ignored. But it's not like you expected anything different.
Enoch Gaver, 21, was killed in the fight in the town of Cottonwood, and suspect David Gaver, 28, was shot in the stomach and taken into custody. Police Sergeant Jeremy Daniels was hit in the leg by a bullet fired during the melee.
Of course, ilsp, the entire point of your post (the bolded statement to compare the treatment by the police in general in the two situations) is completely ignored. But it's not like you expected anything different.
Of course, ilsp, the entire point of your post (the bolded statement to compare the treatment by the police in general in the two situations) is completely ignored. But it's not like you expected anything different.
Of course, ilsp, the entire point of your post (the bolded statement to compare the treatment by the police in general in the two situations) is completely ignored. But it's not like you expected anything different.
Of course, ilsp, the entire point of your post (the bolded statement to compare the treatment by the police in general in the two situations) is completely ignored. But it's not like you expected anything different.
Of course, ilsp, the entire point of your post (the bolded statement to compare the treatment by the police in general in the two situations) is completely ignored. But it's not like you expected anything different.
First off, with regard to my 'dodging your comments' - your posts, like many of the other buffoons here, are given a mere glance my eyes. So if I happened to see your post and respond to it, consider yourself lucky.
This post is particularly funny because if you are talking about the biggest liar in the Ferguson witness cavalcade, the one that had Faux News frothing at the mouth with her now completely discredited assertions, that would be Witness #40, one that corroborated Wilson's account but it is an account that has now been wholly dismissed. In fact, she wasn't even at the scene.
The grand jury witness who testified that she saw Michael Brown pummel a cop before charging at him “like a football player, head down,” is a troubled, bipolar Missouri woman with a criminal past who has a history of making racist remarks and once insinuated herself into another high-profile St. Louis criminal case with claims that police eventually dismissed as a “complete fabrication,” The Smoking Gun has learned.
In interviews with police, FBI agents, and federal and state prosecutors--as well as during two separate appearances before the grand jury that ultimately declined to indict Officer Darren Wilson--the purported eyewitness delivered a preposterous and perjurious account of the fatal encounter in Ferguson.
While the “hands-up” account of Dorian Johnson is often cited by those who demanded Wilson’s indictment, “Witness 40”’s testimony about seeing Brown batter Wilson and then rush the cop like a defensive end has repeatedly been pointed to by Wilson supporters as directly corroborative of the officer’s version of the August 9 confrontation. The “Witness 40” testimony, as Fox News sees it, is proof that the 18-year-old Brown’s killing was justified, and that the Ferguson grand jury got it right.
However, unlike Johnson, “Witness 40”--a 45-year-old St. Louis resident named Sandra McElroy--was nowhere near Canfield Drive on the Saturday afternoon Brown was shot to death.
Did the prosecutor agree with Witness 40? It doesn't matter. His 'witness dump', including her account, did the trick in convincing the jury that no trial would head to a Kangaroo Court for Darrin Wilson, a man who, without her account, could have been brought up on murder charges. Well there went that possibility with her testimony being admitted.
So in a mere two sentences, you look the fool, as usual, like the rest of your GD cronies, in reference to Ferguson and 'lying witnesses'. You know not what of you speak kid.
Shall I go on or leave you wallowing in a quagmire of consternation? I'll leave you be. You seem a bit confused at the moment. Get your bearings and talk to people when you have something meaningful to say.
First off, with regard to my 'dodging your comments' - your posts, like many of the other buffoons here, are given a mere glance my eyes. So if I happened to see your post and respond to it, consider yourself lucky.
This post is particularly funny because if you are talking about the biggest liar in the Ferguson witness cavalcade, the one that had Faux News frothing at the mouth with her now completely discredited assertions, that would be Witness #40, one that corroborated Wilson's account but it is an account that has now been wholly dismissed. In fact, she wasn't even at the scene.
The grand jury witness who testified that she saw Michael Brown pummel a cop before charging at him “like a football player, head down,” is a troubled, bipolar Missouri woman with a criminal past who has a history of making racist remarks and once insinuated herself into another high-profile St. Louis criminal case with claims that police eventually dismissed as a “complete fabrication,” The Smoking Gun has learned.
In interviews with police, FBI agents, and federal and state prosecutors--as well as during two separate appearances before the grand jury that ultimately declined to indict Officer Darren Wilson--the purported eyewitness delivered a preposterous and perjurious account of the fatal encounter in Ferguson.
While the “hands-up” account of Dorian Johnson is often cited by those who demanded Wilson’s indictment, “Witness 40”’s testimony about seeing Brown batter Wilson and then rush the cop like a defensive end has repeatedly been pointed to by Wilson supporters as directly corroborative of the officer’s version of the August 9 confrontation. The “Witness 40” testimony, as Fox News sees it, is proof that the 18-year-old Brown’s killing was justified, and that the Ferguson grand jury got it right.
However, unlike Johnson, “Witness 40”--a 45-year-old St. Louis resident named Sandra McElroy--was nowhere near Canfield Drive on the Saturday afternoon Brown was shot to death.
Did the prosecutor agree with Witness 40? It doesn't matter. His 'witness dump', including her account, did the trick in convincing the jury that no trial would head to a Kangaroo Court for Darrin Wilson, a man who, without her account, could have been brought up on murder charges. Well there went that possibility with her testimony being admitted.
So in a mere two sentences, you look the fool, as usual, like the rest of your GD cronies, in reference to Ferguson and 'lying witnesses'. You know not what of you speak kid.
Shall I go on or leave you wallowing in a quagmire of consternation? I'll leave you be. You seem a bit confused at the moment. Get your bearings and talk to people when you have something meaningful to say.
First off, with regard to my 'dodging your comments' - your posts, like many of the other buffoons here, are given a mere glance my eyes. So if I happened to see your post and respond to it, consider yourself lucky.
This post is particularly funny because if you are talking about the biggest liar in the Ferguson witness cavalcade, the one that had Faux News frothing at the mouth with her now completely discredited assertions, that would be Witness #40, one that corroborated Wilson's account but it is an account that has now been wholly dismissed. In fact, she wasn't even at the scene.
The grand jury witness who testified that she saw Michael Brown pummel a cop before charging at him “like a football player, head down,” is a troubled, bipolar Missouri woman with a criminal past who has a history of making racist remarks and once insinuated herself into another high-profile St. Louis criminal case with claims that police eventually dismissed as a “complete fabrication,” The Smoking Gun has learned.
In interviews with police, FBI agents, and federal and state prosecutors--as well as during two separate appearances before the grand jury that ultimately declined to indict Officer Darren Wilson--the purported eyewitness delivered a preposterous and perjurious account of the fatal encounter in Ferguson.
While the “hands-up” account of Dorian Johnson is often cited by those who demanded Wilson’s indictment, “Witness 40”’s testimony about seeing Brown batter Wilson and then rush the cop like a defensive end has repeatedly been pointed to by Wilson supporters as directly corroborative of the officer’s version of the August 9 confrontation. The “Witness 40” testimony, as Fox News sees it, is proof that the 18-year-old Brown’s killing was justified, and that the Ferguson grand jury got it right.
However, unlike Johnson, “Witness 40”--a 45-year-old St. Louis resident named Sandra McElroy--was nowhere near Canfield Drive on the Saturday afternoon Brown was shot to death.
Did the prosecutor agree with Witness 40? It doesn't matter. His 'witness dump', including her account, did the trick in convincing the jury that no trial would head to a Kangaroo Court for Darrin Wilson, a man who, without her account, could have been brought up on murder charges. Well there went that possibility with her testimony being admitted.
So in a mere two sentences, you look the fool, as usual, like the rest of your GD cronies, in reference to Ferguson and 'lying witnesses'. You know not what of you speak kid.
Shall I go on or leave you wallowing in a quagmire of consternation? I'll leave you be. You seem a bit confused at the moment. Get your bearings and talk to people when you have something meaningful to say.
Sounds very plausible. No way Wilson could have been justified in the shooting.
First off, with regard to my 'dodging your comments' - your posts, like many of the other buffoons here, are given a mere glance my eyes. So if I happened to see your post and respond to it, consider yourself lucky.
This post is particularly funny because if you are talking about the biggest liar in the Ferguson witness cavalcade, the one that had Faux News frothing at the mouth with her now completely discredited assertions, that would be Witness #40, one that corroborated Wilson's account but it is an account that has now been wholly dismissed. In fact, she wasn't even at the scene.
The grand jury witness who testified that she saw Michael Brown pummel a cop before charging at him “like a football player, head down,” is a troubled, bipolar Missouri woman with a criminal past who has a history of making racist remarks and once insinuated herself into another high-profile St. Louis criminal case with claims that police eventually dismissed as a “complete fabrication,” The Smoking Gun has learned.
In interviews with police, FBI agents, and federal and state prosecutors--as well as during two separate appearances before the grand jury that ultimately declined to indict Officer Darren Wilson--the purported eyewitness delivered a preposterous and perjurious account of the fatal encounter in Ferguson.
While the “hands-up” account of Dorian Johnson is often cited by those who demanded Wilson’s indictment, “Witness 40”’s testimony about seeing Brown batter Wilson and then rush the cop like a defensive end has repeatedly been pointed to by Wilson supporters as directly corroborative of the officer’s version of the August 9 confrontation. The “Witness 40” testimony, as Fox News sees it, is proof that the 18-year-old Brown’s killing was justified, and that the Ferguson grand jury got it right.
However, unlike Johnson, “Witness 40”--a 45-year-old St. Louis resident named Sandra McElroy--was nowhere near Canfield Drive on the Saturday afternoon Brown was shot to death.
Did the prosecutor agree with Witness 40? It doesn't matter. His 'witness dump', including her account, did the trick in convincing the jury that no trial would head to a Kangaroo Court for Darrin Wilson, a man who, without her account, could have been brought up on murder charges. Well there went that possibility with her testimony being admitted.
So in a mere two sentences, you look the fool, as usual, like the rest of your GD cronies, in reference to Ferguson and 'lying witnesses'. You know not what of you speak kid.
Shall I go on or leave you wallowing in a quagmire of consternation? I'll leave you be. You seem a bit confused at the moment. Get your bearings and talk to people when you have something meaningful to say.
Sounds very plausible. No way Wilson could have been justified in the shooting.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.