Mikey Spills the Beans on the Bailout..Or How it really works
Where we are now They need to sell allot of bonds over the next year so the noise will push “investors into the bond market just when they have a need to sell all of those bailout bonds. The assets of the defaulted banks are being bought up and distributed to the insiders for penny’s on the dollar. Those assets will skyrocket and the congress is arguing over who will get to own and manage those assets the is the hang up in congress now the deal is done the coyotes are arguing over the carcass...The beat goes on
Where we are now They need to sell allot of bonds over the next year so the noise will push “investors into the bond market just when they have a need to sell all of those bailout bonds. The assets of the defaulted banks are being bought up and distributed to the insiders for penny’s on the dollar. Those assets will skyrocket and the congress is arguing over who will get to own and manage those assets the is the hang up in congress now the deal is done the coyotes are arguing over the carcass...The beat goes on
What the hell is your problem?
You created an alias, maybe you need some time in the box to sober up.
Read the site manifesto and cool it with being pissed off that I banned the other account.
See you in a few weeks.
What the hell is your problem?
You created an alias, maybe you need some time in the box to sober up.
Read the site manifesto and cool it with being pissed off that I banned the other account.
See you in a few weeks.
Come on guys, both of you grow up a little.
Mikey, you are pissed about you other name, but rules are rules.
WSC, you are bigger than this, no need to box him, just tell him to chill out and if he keeps pushing the issue then box him. The only issue I have seen between you two was the MarketShadow thing and the line above, neither being more than petty BS which is what over 50% of the posts in every other forum is.
Come on guys, both of you grow up a little.
Mikey, you are pissed about you other name, but rules are rules.
WSC, you are bigger than this, no need to box him, just tell him to chill out and if he keeps pushing the issue then box him. The only issue I have seen between you two was the MarketShadow thing and the line above, neither being more than petty BS which is what over 50% of the posts in every other forum is.
He had it coming.
I tried to be a nice guy since he posts in here, but telling me I am banned from his threads is stupid. So he gets the same treatment any other member who creates an alias does, he gets some box time.
Seems like he didnt care to be respectful, fine with me.
He had it coming.
I tried to be a nice guy since he posts in here, but telling me I am banned from his threads is stupid. So he gets the same treatment any other member who creates an alias does, he gets some box time.
Seems like he didnt care to be respectful, fine with me.
As to the other screen name, calling it an alias is a bit much. We all know the intention of that rule and using that as a reason is well, weak. Especially given the fact that it was banned several days ago.
What he wrote above was childish and something I did not think I would see in here, but not something that you two couldn't have worked out in the course of normal message board conversation.
I'm going back to watch Georgia get their shyt pushed in
As to the other screen name, calling it an alias is a bit much. We all know the intention of that rule and using that as a reason is well, weak. Especially given the fact that it was banned several days ago.
What he wrote above was childish and something I did not think I would see in here, but not something that you two couldn't have worked out in the course of normal message board conversation.
I'm going back to watch Georgia get their shyt pushed in
I get what you are saying, I just thought that the guys that post in this section would be able to work through their differences better than in other sections of Covers.
As to the other screen name, calling it an alias is a bit much. We all know the intention of that rule and using that as a reason is well, weak. Especially given the fact that it was banned several days ago.
What he wrote above was childish and something I did not think I would see in here, but not something that you two couldn't have worked out in the course of normal message board conversation.
I'm going back to watch Georgia get their shyt pushed in
. I agree with what was said above. Don't want to stick my nose where it doesn't belong, but I agree that it could have been worked out without the boxing. I think his statement was a little childish and unneccesary, especially in the investment section, but I think he makes a lot of good points and contributes well to the forum, and I would hate to see a good poster decide to not come back over something stupid like that.
Just my 2 cents.![]()
I get what you are saying, I just thought that the guys that post in this section would be able to work through their differences better than in other sections of Covers.
As to the other screen name, calling it an alias is a bit much. We all know the intention of that rule and using that as a reason is well, weak. Especially given the fact that it was banned several days ago.
What he wrote above was childish and something I did not think I would see in here, but not something that you two couldn't have worked out in the course of normal message board conversation.
I'm going back to watch Georgia get their shyt pushed in
. I agree with what was said above. Don't want to stick my nose where it doesn't belong, but I agree that it could have been worked out without the boxing. I think his statement was a little childish and unneccesary, especially in the investment section, but I think he makes a lot of good points and contributes well to the forum, and I would hate to see a good poster decide to not come back over something stupid like that.
Just my 2 cents.![]()
The problem is that no area of the site is immune to the Manifesto, here or anywhere.
He gave an "adios" thread saying he was gone and never coming back, then he makes an alias (go look it up, its right there) which broke the rules.
I then tried to tell him that he cannot make aliases just because he didnt like the username (hell I dont like MY username, when the Wagerline merge happened I lost my original username but I didnt go and make another) and many other posters arent thrilled with their names, but it is not ok to create another. When you make a name that is what you stick with.
Then he comes back with mikey after the other was banned, even though he said he was done and he was pissed off that I banned the other account and acts like a jerk. I see no reason for me to bend rules in this area, and ESPECIALLY when the guy is a jerk to me to boot.
I should have acted on boxing him initially, I was on vacation and actually forgot about the whole thing, and his rude comment to me just reminded the fact that he broke the rules after being told it wasnt ok, this is all on him. He was told BEFORE making the alias that it is NOT ok to make an alias..believe me, the guy was warned and given plenty of chances and he brought this on himself.
He will be out of the box in a few weeks barring getting banned before hand.
The problem is that no area of the site is immune to the Manifesto, here or anywhere.
He gave an "adios" thread saying he was gone and never coming back, then he makes an alias (go look it up, its right there) which broke the rules.
I then tried to tell him that he cannot make aliases just because he didnt like the username (hell I dont like MY username, when the Wagerline merge happened I lost my original username but I didnt go and make another) and many other posters arent thrilled with their names, but it is not ok to create another. When you make a name that is what you stick with.
Then he comes back with mikey after the other was banned, even though he said he was done and he was pissed off that I banned the other account and acts like a jerk. I see no reason for me to bend rules in this area, and ESPECIALLY when the guy is a jerk to me to boot.
I should have acted on boxing him initially, I was on vacation and actually forgot about the whole thing, and his rude comment to me just reminded the fact that he broke the rules after being told it wasnt ok, this is all on him. He was told BEFORE making the alias that it is NOT ok to make an alias..believe me, the guy was warned and given plenty of chances and he brought this on himself.
He will be out of the box in a few weeks barring getting banned before hand.
cd, read the Manifesto. You dont have the option of changing usernames, once you pick one you are stuck with it.
Mikey decided he could change usernames because he WANTED to and he could. Well it looks like he couldnt..
cd, read the Manifesto. You dont have the option of changing usernames, once you pick one you are stuck with it.
Mikey decided he could change usernames because he WANTED to and he could. Well it looks like he couldnt..
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 264,965
- Saturday 09/26/2026 513
- All About streak Survivor! 5,909
- POY: Clemson +1 at Cal 6,375
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,228
- Saturday Football 11,242
- ***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 26, 2026 * Week #4 * NCAAF College Football Plays*** 5,233
- **$$$ MD Saturday 9/26 $$$** 6,392
- Tenn Sucks so bad 518
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 16,536
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
