All Forums | Mixed Martial Arts

Michael Johnson got robbed!!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1678
Posts: 24
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 412
Posted: #1
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 649
Posted: #2
Yep. That was awful.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 56149
Posted: #3
I took Darniusz and over so I'm happy.  It was a close fight.  But I agree Johnson should have won probably.  
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 5238
Posted: #4
Completely agree. No action on it.........but Johnson got screwed.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 2337
Posted: #5
yup.. somehow i'm ALWAYS on these bullshitttt decisions... yet i've never got one in my favor


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 56149
Posted: #6
I'm on Tex for the last fight. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1098
Posted: #7
Only clear round was the 3rd for Benial. 1st 2 rounds could've gone either way in my opinion. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 6137
Posted: #8
Not robbed, RAPED !!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 412
Posted: #9
How can u say the fight was close?? Damiusz couldn't even believe he won....so stupid
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 2337
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan8890:

Only clear round was the 3rd for Benial. 1st 2 rounds could've gone either way in my opinion. 


I don't know WTF you were watching....



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 3323
Posted: #11
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 412
Posted: #12
 tHow can u say the fight was close?? Damiusz couldn't even believe he won....so stupid
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 1878
Posted: #13
Yeah wow @ anyone saying it was close.  Absolute robbery.  One of the worst I've ever seen.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 213
Posted: #14
i saw the judges' scorecards after the event and all 3 judges gave Johnson Round 1.....2 of the 3 gave Dariush Round 2.....and all 3 gave Dariush Round 3......I completely agreed with Round 1 going to Johnson and Dariush getting Round 3 (although it was super close).....no way in HELL did Dariush take Round 2....no freaking way....in fact, if it had been a unanimous 30-27 for Johnson, I don't think I would have argued that.....this is one of the worst decisions I've ever seen in my life....every single media outlet scored the fight for Johnson....Johnson was -9.5 on the live point spread heading to the cards and the ML was -2500....i just can't understand how it's possible for EVERY SINGLE PERSON in the world watching a fight to score it correctly except for the 3 people that sit there and get paid to do it....even people who wagered on Dariush were admitting it was a horrible decision and you rarely get the majority of folks saying that because they are so biased....and I agree with the above poster, somehow I'm ALWAYS on the wrong end of these decisions....Johnson winning would have finished the last leg of several parlays that would have profited me over $1,000....I'm sick to my stomach....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 213
Posted: #15
I also wanted to note that Johnson stuffed ALL 7 of Dariush's takedown attempts, controlled the center of the octagon for basically the entire fight, knocked Dariush down at one point, and also landed more significant strikes.....but somehow 2 judges claim Johnson lost 2 of 3 rounds? GTFOH
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 1239
Posted: #16
they ufc made up for one bad decision agaisnt a semetic guy(nijem) to give it to another semetic guy(dariush)

what theu ufc should do is after every controversial decision have a poll voted for by the fans and if 95 percent feel that a fighter lost that a judge had winning said judge should be suspended for one year.

this shi-t is not accepetble for punters nor for the fighters whose livelihood depends on wins and losses
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #17
going into the 3rd johnsons face was beat up compared to a brand new dariush. johnsons punches would miss and dariush would counter and hit. split decis for sure but, even Rashad was a whiny baby about it. If you don't finish you have to rely on judges. payday for this guy
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan8890:

Only clear round was the 3rd for Benial. 1st 2 rounds could've gone either way in my opinion. 

that's what i saw
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by p6y1:

I also wanted to note that Johnson stuffed ALL 7 of Dariush's takedown attempts, controlled the center of the octagon for basically the entire fight, knocked Dariush down at one point, and also landed more significant strikes.....but somehow 2 judges claim Johnson lost 2 of 3 rounds? GTFOH

ya he never knocked him down. whiners fan
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 213
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by Hawky:


ya he never knocked him down. whiners fan


HAHAHAHA are you kidding me? You making that statement just proves you didn't even pay attention to the fight. Johnson CLEARLY knocked Dariush down in the 1st round with a huge punch. Johnson was outloanded Dariush in EVERY round based on the fight stats presented, including 34-22 in the 2nd (which Dariush supposedly won).

Johnson controlled the center of the cage for 99% of the fight and stuffed all 7 takedown attempts from Darisuh, which meant JOHNSON was the one dictating where the fight took place.

Not only that, but Johnson was -600 after round 1, and -1200 after Round 2 in live betting....he was -2500 live after round 3 and going to the judges' scorecards. If it was so clear that Dariush had a great chance of winning the fight, I highly doubt well respected sportsbooks would leave such a huge opportunity for people to cash in on Dariush at that point. Johnson was -2500 because he had EASILY won 2 of 3 rounds, and could make the argument he won all 3. Every media outlet scored the fight for Johnson as well. It's not like this was a razor thin fight and people weren't surprised by the outcome. They WERE surprised because it was one of the biggest robberies we've seen all year, if not beyond that.

The fact you think Johnson never knocked down Dariush makes anything you say irrational and illogical. What a joke lol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 3387
Posted: #21
shows me you know nothing about fighting
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 213
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by Hawky:

shows me you know nothing about fighting


lol I type a ton of valid reasons why Michael Johnson won the fight, including pointing out that you didn't even know Johnson knocked Dariush down with a clean punch in the 1st round, and that is your response?

This board has some great members with valuable opinions, but it's a shame that it's also cluttered with people like you. When you have reasoning that is so erroneous, it makes everything you say seem worthless because you have nothing to back it up. I'm still laughing at the thought of you not realizing Dariush was knocked down in the 1st round. It was one of the big reasons Johnson clearly won the 1st. Shows you didn't even watch the damn fight lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2015
Posts: 339
Posted: #23
He clearly knocked him down. Dariush even said it in his post fight interview.

My thought  Johnson Clearly won the 1st and Dariush won the 3rd. I also thought Johnson won the second but wasn't nearly as convincing as the 1st. When you're a top 5 fighter in the world you should be closing these fights out in convincing fashion and he just did not do that. Still a bad decision imo but Johnson didn't do himself any favors in that 3rd rd.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 213
Posted: #24
yea, I agree, I thought Johnson clearly won the 1, Dariush most likely won the 3rd (Johnson seemed to coast in that round), and felt that Johnson was the most likely winner of Round 2. The live betting odds reflected this as well, with Johnson being -600 after Rd1, -1200 after Rd 2, and -2500 going to the scorecards.

I had several longshot parlays that needed Johnson so I hedged with Dariush +800 after Round 2, not because I thought the fight was close, but just because you never know if Dariush could score a takedown and lock in a late sub as Johnson tired out. I was actually pissed after Round 3 because I thought I had wasted some money by hedging. Little did I know I was lucky I decided to do it. Still, seemed like a very clear cut 29-28 for Johnson, and some could even argue getting 1 judge to see 30-27. Wish the UFC would stop saying "don't leave it in the hands of the judges." Not every fighter is a finisher and they shouldn't be punished for not being able to finish their opponent. They should feel somewhat confident that a set of 3 competent judges can score a fight correctly when most of the casual viewers watching the fight at home can tell who won the fight.
All Forums | Mixed Martial Arts
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.