I want to put something into perspective for us UFC/MMA bettors pertaining to tonight's co-main...Joanna is one of the biggest, glaring sucker bets I have seen in a long, long time. We are talking about the previous "phenom" and "unstoppable" strawweight champion right? The same woman who was -1000 or more when she was booked to fight Rose the first time...you're trying to tell me that after her first loss oddsmakers decide to make Joann -120 odds??? That is a near 900 drop in juice or MORE compared to the first fight....when Ronda lost to Holly she was still a moderate favorite in the rematch...and Ronda got absolutely destroyed...so why wouldn't Joanna be at least a -180 or -200 favorite? It is because oddsmakers understand that she is probably going to get her ass kicked again and therefore they want all the money on Joanna. Books are going to cash in big after Joanna gets knocked the F out again!
For the people who are like "oh well you are just fading her due to the line that's all you have to offer"
A couple of other tidbits: most of the time when a once undefeated fighter gets beat up bad or knocked out...they NEVER come back the same. Proof is in the pudding- Anderson Silva, Ronda Rousey, Chris Weidman...I guarantee Joanna is not the same fighter at all. Lastly: Rose's hand speed and accuracy will be too much for Joanna. Joanna won't be able to win the pocket exchanges therefore she will try to point fight, and that won't work for 5 full rounds, eventually Rose will land the deadly combo that will lay Joanna on her ugly ass.
If I am wrong than shame on me, as far as i'm concerned though, do NOT put your hard earned money on Joanna.
Rose Namajunas to win 250!
Good luck either way and enjoy the fights tonight!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I want to put something into perspective for us UFC/MMA bettors pertaining to tonight's co-main...Joanna is one of the biggest, glaring sucker bets I have seen in a long, long time. We are talking about the previous "phenom" and "unstoppable" strawweight champion right? The same woman who was -1000 or more when she was booked to fight Rose the first time...you're trying to tell me that after her first loss oddsmakers decide to make Joann -120 odds??? That is a near 900 drop in juice or MORE compared to the first fight....when Ronda lost to Holly she was still a moderate favorite in the rematch...and Ronda got absolutely destroyed...so why wouldn't Joanna be at least a -180 or -200 favorite? It is because oddsmakers understand that she is probably going to get her ass kicked again and therefore they want all the money on Joanna. Books are going to cash in big after Joanna gets knocked the F out again!
For the people who are like "oh well you are just fading her due to the line that's all you have to offer"
A couple of other tidbits: most of the time when a once undefeated fighter gets beat up bad or knocked out...they NEVER come back the same. Proof is in the pudding- Anderson Silva, Ronda Rousey, Chris Weidman...I guarantee Joanna is not the same fighter at all. Lastly: Rose's hand speed and accuracy will be too much for Joanna. Joanna won't be able to win the pocket exchanges therefore she will try to point fight, and that won't work for 5 full rounds, eventually Rose will land the deadly combo that will lay Joanna on her ugly ass.
If I am wrong than shame on me, as far as i'm concerned though, do NOT put your hard earned money on Joanna.
Rose Namajunas to win 250!
Good luck either way and enjoy the fights tonight!
"...so why wouldn't Joanna be at least a -180 or -200 favorite?"
Just to clarify, the odds on this rematch opened at Joanna (-225) and Rose at (+180), so I would imagine the money came in on Rose early due to the way the first fight played out just five months ago.
0
"...so why wouldn't Joanna be at least a -180 or -200 favorite?"
Just to clarify, the odds on this rematch opened at Joanna (-225) and Rose at (+180), so I would imagine the money came in on Rose early due to the way the first fight played out just five months ago.
Silva was 35+ years old. Rousey was never good and couldn't throw a punch to save her life. Weidman lost to 3 talented fighters.
I mean your basis of placing this bet is the line. How bout mentioning Joanna went through a horrible weightcut and she actually looked good yesterday?
How about the pressure Rose now has as the champ and how Joanna can realx
0
"Anderson Silva, Ronda Rousey, Chris Weidman..."
Silva was 35+ years old. Rousey was never good and couldn't throw a punch to save her life. Weidman lost to 3 talented fighters.
I mean your basis of placing this bet is the line. How bout mentioning Joanna went through a horrible weightcut and she actually looked good yesterday?
How about the pressure Rose now has as the champ and how Joanna can realx
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.