1. Parlay of Ben Henderson over Rustam Khabilov, Rafael Dos Anjos over Jason High and John Dodson over John Moraga. Risking 3 units to win 3.6 units.
2. Bryan Caraway (-105) over Erik Perez. Risking 3.15 units to win 3 units.
3. Jon Tuck (-160) over Jake Lindsey. Risking 3.2 units to win 2 units.
4. Piotr Hallmann (-165) over Yves Edwards. Risking 3.3 units to win 2 units.
5. Bobby Voelker (-117) over Lance Benoist. Risking 2.35 units to win 2 units.
6. Diego Sanchez (+150) over Ross Pearson, Risking 2 units to win 3 units.
7. Parlay of Patrick Cummins over Roger Narvaez, Scott Jorgensen over Danny Martinez and Sergio Pettis over Yaotzin Meza. Risking 2 units to win 2.45 units.
8. Sergio Pettis - Yaotzin Meza under 2.5 rounds (+120). Risking 1 unit to win 1.2 units.
9. Rafael Dos Anjos - Jason High under 2,5 rounds (+175). Risking 1 unit to win 1.75 units.
BOL to everyone with your plays!!!
0
Here are the plays:
1. Parlay of Ben Henderson over Rustam Khabilov, Rafael Dos Anjos over Jason High and John Dodson over John Moraga. Risking 3 units to win 3.6 units.
2. Bryan Caraway (-105) over Erik Perez. Risking 3.15 units to win 3 units.
3. Jon Tuck (-160) over Jake Lindsey. Risking 3.2 units to win 2 units.
4. Piotr Hallmann (-165) over Yves Edwards. Risking 3.3 units to win 2 units.
5. Bobby Voelker (-117) over Lance Benoist. Risking 2.35 units to win 2 units.
6. Diego Sanchez (+150) over Ross Pearson, Risking 2 units to win 3 units.
7. Parlay of Patrick Cummins over Roger Narvaez, Scott Jorgensen over Danny Martinez and Sergio Pettis over Yaotzin Meza. Risking 2 units to win 2.45 units.
8. Sergio Pettis - Yaotzin Meza under 2.5 rounds (+120). Risking 1 unit to win 1.2 units.
9. Rafael Dos Anjos - Jason High under 2,5 rounds (+175). Risking 1 unit to win 1.75 units.
Caraway/Perez - I take a small bet at +120 whoever get there
Jake Lindsey - Tuck have the worse style for a fighter
Piotr Hallmann - yeah we agree, I hope Hallmann use clinch & td
Lance Benoist - they are moving in 2 different speed, just worry Benoist ring rust.
Ross Pearson - but not going to pay -160, waiting for a better line or tinny bet
Let us battle! gl with your plays.
I lost 7 small units in this card. I lost 8 unit on Ross Pearson instead of winning 6. F*ck me, came so close ending my downswing if Pearson gets the decision.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GigaOuts:
One of us will lose again I think...I have:
Rustam Khabilov
Jason High - for value
Caraway/Perez - I take a small bet at +120 whoever get there
Jake Lindsey - Tuck have the worse style for a fighter
Piotr Hallmann - yeah we agree, I hope Hallmann use clinch & td
Lance Benoist - they are moving in 2 different speed, just worry Benoist ring rust.
Ross Pearson - but not going to pay -160, waiting for a better line or tinny bet
Let us battle! gl with your plays.
I lost 7 small units in this card. I lost 8 unit on Ross Pearson instead of winning 6. F*ck me, came so close ending my downswing if Pearson gets the decision.
That why you can't blame the judges, even Sanchez is gifted with a decision is not happy with a split, he think he should won by unanimous decision. It seems bad decision goes both way but it seems that my bigger bet goes against me & I have no problem win controversial decision on my smaller bet...fml.
It seems you are on a hot streak again mr219. I will take some time off capping & just tail you on the next card....lol.
0
That why you can't blame the judges, even Sanchez is gifted with a decision is not happy with a split, he think he should won by unanimous decision. It seems bad decision goes both way but it seems that my bigger bet goes against me & I have no problem win controversial decision on my smaller bet...fml.
It seems you are on a hot streak again mr219. I will take some time off capping & just tail you on the next card....lol.
That why you can't blame the judges, even Sanchez is gifted with a decision is not happy with a split, he think he should won by unanimous decision. It seems bad decision goes both way but it seems that my bigger bet goes against me & I have no problem win controversial decision on my smaller bet...fml.
It seems you are on a hot streak again mr219. I will take some time off capping & just tail you on the next card....lol.
Diego Sanchez may be the most delusional person on the planet at the moment!
0
Quote Originally Posted by GigaOuts:
That why you can't blame the judges, even Sanchez is gifted with a decision is not happy with a split, he think he should won by unanimous decision. It seems bad decision goes both way but it seems that my bigger bet goes against me & I have no problem win controversial decision on my smaller bet...fml.
It seems you are on a hot streak again mr219. I will take some time off capping & just tail you on the next card....lol.
Diego Sanchez may be the most delusional person on the planet at the moment!
Diego Sanchez may be the most delusional person on the planet at the moment!
Not just Diego, so is Raphael Assuncao who also gifted a split decision vs Dillashaw is not happy that 1 of the Judges give it to Dillashaw, Assuncao question that 1 judge what he is watching....lol. And of course I have 2g on Dillashaw in that matchup. I wish the book give you an option to have wager cancel in the event of a split decision or add 2 more judges so it a bit harder to bribe 3 judges than 2.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MR219:
Diego Sanchez may be the most delusional person on the planet at the moment!
Not just Diego, so is Raphael Assuncao who also gifted a split decision vs Dillashaw is not happy that 1 of the Judges give it to Dillashaw, Assuncao question that 1 judge what he is watching....lol. And of course I have 2g on Dillashaw in that matchup. I wish the book give you an option to have wager cancel in the event of a split decision or add 2 more judges so it a bit harder to bribe 3 judges than 2.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.