All Forums | Mixed Martial Arts

UFC FN 55

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 881
Posts: 22
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #1
1 star on Luke Rockhold (-411). 107 to win 25ish. War of words will be done Friday night, thank god!!! Bisbing against top 5 guys, all loses. This trend continues as Rockhold if he doesn't headhunt should control this fight wherever it goes. More pics later this week if I find any, for sure though O/U leans.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #2
For all you parlay guys, I would wheel Rockhold!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 220
Posted: #3

What makes you so sure rockhold wins this? the losses against top 5 could also be seen has the only legit loss ( not on streroid/TRT) at mid weight was against kennedy coming back from a big layoff. And rockhold got ko by vitor too but way faster. everyone would against juiced vitor. Don't get me wrong I see rockhold winning but I really don't see it has a sure win , which his the only time I bet those kind of -odds.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 84
Posted: #4
 

GL Ferrari. However, I've gotta go with Bisping on this one. . I'll be posting tomorrow some time.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #5
All good points guys, no doubt. If I really like Rockhold I'd have 450 to win 100, which I don't. A standard 100 bet isn't that bad and I can't control people pushing the line higher. As far as the fight, younger, bigger, stronger, more ways to finish is why I'm playing Rockhold.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #6
As far as the TRT guys go, can't stand them and very hard for me to bet on them at all. As far as Bisbing goes, play him for a 100 to get 375 back, seems like good value.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by TheIrishCarBomb:

GL Ferrari. However, I've gotta go with Bisping on this one. . I'll be posting tomorrow some time.



Good luck Bomb!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by MMAwizard:

What makes you so sure rockhold wins this? the losses against top 5 could also be seen has the only legit loss ( not on streroid/TRT) at mid weight was against kennedy coming back from a big layoff. And rockhold got ko by vitor too but way faster. everyone would against juiced vitor. Don't get me wrong I see rockhold winning but I really don't see it has a sure win , which his the only time I bet those kind of -odds.



Jon Jones didn't have a issue with the juiced Belfort, granted different weight. Silva had no issue with Sonnen and I thought bisbing beat sonnen too. Rockhold fighting Belfort in Brazil in his first UFC fight was giving money to us.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #9
About the wheel bet, which neither of my sites let me do which is BS, Id play Rockhold with all the other fighters I like to win. Say 10 a play and if Rockhold won, the wheel is open, if not I would be down 100.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 220
Posted: #10
Well in Jones carrer , vitor came the closest to finish him, that sub was almost there.. and the reach difference was insane , never mind the weight difference.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 220
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari29:

r. As far as the fight, younger, bigger, stronger, more ways to finish is why I'm playing Rockhold.
Just to see another angle, Bisping, better technical strker, great takedown def, might have better endurance/cardio ( not seen enough of late rounds from rockhold to be sure) and been facing better competition for a while.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 220
Posted: #12
But all this to say, I really think rockhold takes this and even if bisping does have value I dislike him to much to play him, they are 3 to 4 fighters that I really need them to have great value to bet them ( because I hate them ) and bisping his one of them,
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by MMAwizard:

But all this to say, I really think rockhold takes this and even if bisping does have value I dislike him to much to play him, they are 3 to 4 fighters that I really need them to have great value to bet them ( because I hate them ) and bisping his one of them,



I agree with that Wizard.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari29:

Quote Originally Posted by MMAwizard:

But all this to say, I really think rockhold takes this and even if bisping does have value I dislike him to much to play him, they are 3 to 4 fighters that I really need them to have great value to bet them ( because I hate them ) and bisping his one of them,
I agree with that Wizard.[/Quot

You can add the guilty TRT guys to the mix of disliked guys in my book!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #15
UFC FN 55 O/U leans. Under 2 1/2 Rockhold, 20 gets you 31. Either he gets him early or it goes the distance. Would have loved to see Bisbing put up his money for this bet!!!!!!! Under 1 1/2 Palelei, 29 gets you 20. Under 1 1/2 Filho, 28 gets you 20.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #16
Ok guys I got no PBR plays for UFC FN 55, don't really like the card much and i'm fine with only having $177 in action. But I am gonna play some 2 dollar bets just to amuse myself. So the 2 dollar guys are Pearson(-150), Whittaker(+155), Palelei(-160), Rocha(+300) tailing Murkcity here as we all are, lol. Perosh(+170), Alvey(+145), and Clements(+125).I will add these 2 dollar plays to my total and I"ll be around during the day to answer any questions. BOL guys!!!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #17
Wanted to add, I'm tailing the O, mister, and Jim Gunn on the Clements fight
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 6706
Posted: #18
BOL FERRARI!!! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #19
My bad $191 in action.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari29:

Wanted to add, I'm tailing the O, mister, and Jim Gunn on the Clements fight




Thanks guys, easy money!!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #21
plus 54ish  but i missed a shyt ton of money.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 3106
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by MMAwizard:

What makes you so sure rockhold wins this? the losses against top 5 could also be seen has the only legit loss ( not on streroid/TRT) at mid weight was against kennedy coming back from a big layoff. And rockhold got ko by vitor too but way faster. everyone would against juiced vitor. Don't get me wrong I see rockhold winning but I really don't see it has a sure win , which his the only time I bet those kind of -odds.




was that sure enough Wizard!!!!!!!!!!

All Forums | Mixed Martial Arts
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.