Who on Renzo at -350?

I don’t think Matt Hughes heart is in fighting anymore. He will have a tough time with his striking and he won’t want to engage in a fight on the ground with Renzo. Hughes strength is wrestling control on the ground and pounding a guy out. He does not like to be on the bottom and even though he is a good grappler he is not a great one like Renzo.

https://www.fighting-mma.com/mma-matchups/2010/ufc-112-matt-hughes-renzo-gracie.php

 I feel the ground game is a push

i had bisbing at +105

 i took it early, the thought the line would have moved the other way

Quote Originally Posted by boberts427:

Dennis Kang was not a dog for that fight

Kang opened as the dog.Just because he was he favorite on fight night doesnt mean a thing

When I say doesnt mean a thing I mean it doesnt to me.I watch/bet lines when they open so I considered Kang a dog.

If you'd like me to say last time I remember him saying bet heavy on something it was Kang "the favorite" that got murdered I will so the 16 year olds will be happy .

One says he got Bisping at +105 ,one says +125 but neither of you can put 2+2 together and think he was ever the favorite with the line moving the way it did?

But what should I expect thats what children do ,nitpick

Hey, some sites open Dogs at different numbers you know...They don't all post the same numbers.

I bet on him the day the Lines were posted at betus. I don't know what the original lines were months before that when you seen them.

I am not nitpicking or acting like a child at all, I am just saying what I had him at.

Correction, I had Bisping at +115, not +125

From the early opening lines that I found they both opened at -115

Not that it matters anyways really. I mean that fight was a coin toss IMO anyways. Besides, what does that have to do with this Hughes fight anyways?

Correction, I had Bisping at +115, not +125

From the early opening lines that I found they both opened at -115

Not that it matters anyways really. I mean that fight was a coin toss IMO anyways. Besides, what does that have to do with this Hughes fight anyways?

[/Quote

One fight has nothing to do with another.The only thing I was saying is last time I remember him saying "bet heavy" on something meaning make a big bet was him on Kang.He's saying bet heavy again and again I say he's wrong

Why insult someone for liking value in a +350 'dog?  I got a lot of shit when I bet Sonnen at +350 against Marquardt.  Big dog's don't win all that often, but if someone thinks the line is too high, there can be some value there. 

I still kick myself for not even looking at playing that fight. Sonnen had wins over Okami,  Dan Miller, the only guy to beat Paulo Filho. the only guy to beat Bryan Baker(Who?) and no one was even talking about his chances against Nate

This guy (fightingmma) has made one post in any of my threads.Here was his post:

"you keeping on talking about a bunch of guys that gets together and gab about MMA

you guys curcle jerk each other as well "

Anyone that says something like that deserves bashed

Theres a big difference in saying bet a dog and bet huge on this play. Gracie might be worth a very small play (I'm not betting it) but he's 100% not worth a huge play and thats what this guy is reccomending

mma how is Renzos stand up better?

Point taken

I also wasn't aware of that comment he made in one of your threads.