5/15/11 $$$ Lakerkyle's System Bets $$$ LOTS OF PLAYS ON BOARD!!!

4* PLAYS: 0-1-0 (-6.2 units)

3* PLAYS: 1-1-0 (+0.0 units)

2* PLAYS: 1-1-1 (+2.0 units)

1* PLAYS: 4-7-0 (-4.90 units)

Not exactly the way i wanted to start with these system bets. Maybe it will turn out to be a FADE system!!!  

Lets See how Day 2 does for us...

• 5* Tigers -190 (POD)
• 4* Athletics -165 (POD #2)
• 3* Indians -140
• 3* Phillies -120
• 3* Mets -110
• 3* Reds +100
• 3* Rockies -145
• 2* Pirates +155
• 2* Mariners/Indians UNDER 7.5 (-125)
• 2* Rays -140
• 2* Orioles/Rays UNDER 8.5 (-105)
• 2* Nationals -120
• 2* Twins +105
• 2* Blue Jays/Twins OVER 7.5 (-105)
• 2* Yankees +105
• 2* Pirates/Brewers OVER 7.5 (-105)
• 1* Mets/Astros OVER 8.5 (-110)
• 1* Red Sox/Yankees UNDER 8.5 (+100)
• 1* Rangers -145
• 1* Giants -145
• 1* Diamondbacks -110

1* Plays took a hit yesterday. So i wouldn't trust too much in them unless you really like a couple of them. My 2* and 3* Plays did alright. And the only reason the 4* play is down so many units is because there were a bunch of units placed on it. It should even out once it starts hitting. BOL EVERYONE!!!

I know its a bunch of plays. After a while i will get the hang of this and will cut down on the plays. Just hang in there with me!!!

Thanks Everyone!!!

Fixed Record:

2* PLAYS: 2-1-1 (+2.0 units)

4* PLAYS: 0-1-0 (-6.2 units)

3* PLAYS: 2-1-0 (+3.0 units)

2* PLAYS: 2-1-1 (+2.0 units)

1* PLAYS: 4-7-0 (-4.90 units)

3* Reds +100 (Final Score: 9-7) 

4* PLAYS: 0-1-0 (-6.20 units)

3* PLAYS: 3-2-0 (+2.40 units)

2* PLAYS: 5-5-1 (-0.90 units)

1* PLAYS: 5-7-0 (-3.90 units)

3* Phillies -120  (Final Score: 2-3)

3* Mets -110  (Final Score: 7-4)

2* Pirates +155  (Final Score: 6-9)

2* Rays -140  (Final Score: 3-9)

2* Orioles/Rays UNDER 8.5 (-105)  (Final Score: 3-9)

2* Nationals -120  (Final Score: 8-4)

2* Twins +105  (Final Score: 3-11)

2* Blue Jays/Twins OVER 7.5 (-105)  (Final Score: 11-3)

2* Pirates/Brewers OVER 7.5 (-105) (Final Score: 6-9) 

1* Mets/Astros OVER 8.5 (-110) (Final Score: 7-4)