Zach Davies beat Tanner Roark on April 1st of this season. Since then against Milwaukee, Roark beat Jimmy Nelson and Chase Anderson. The Brewers should be able to get at least 4 runs off of Roark today, in an attempt to even the series at 1-1. Using the April 1st formula, Claudio, another right hander like Guerra, and Hadr , will give the Brewers the pitching they need to win this game. Not to take anything away from Suarez yesterday, but he was 0-13 against Jeffress going into that game winning homerun he hit. This should be an eye opener to Counsel , that Jeffress is not the pitcher he was last year. I don't expect that Jeffress will get into today's game at all.
BREWERS -135
RISK $270 to WIN $200
Season Total +$1300
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Zach Davies beat Tanner Roark on April 1st of this season. Since then against Milwaukee, Roark beat Jimmy Nelson and Chase Anderson. The Brewers should be able to get at least 4 runs off of Roark today, in an attempt to even the series at 1-1. Using the April 1st formula, Claudio, another right hander like Guerra, and Hadr , will give the Brewers the pitching they need to win this game. Not to take anything away from Suarez yesterday, but he was 0-13 against Jeffress going into that game winning homerun he hit. This should be an eye opener to Counsel , that Jeffress is not the pitcher he was last year. I don't expect that Jeffress will get into today's game at all.
You would be more "credible"......if... "at-least-ONCE", you chose Milwaukee to lose a game, instead of trying relentlessly to justify Milwaukee winning......EVERY SINGLE GAME THEY PLAY!!!
He picked Cincinnati yesterday.
Like the pick today, Hader should be available too.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lajohn:
You would be more "credible"......if... "at-least-ONCE", you chose Milwaukee to lose a game, instead of trying relentlessly to justify Milwaukee winning......EVERY SINGLE GAME THEY PLAY!!!
He picked Cincinnati yesterday.
Like the pick today, Hader should be available too.
You would be more "credible"......if... "at-least-ONCE", you chose Milwaukee to lose a game, instead of trying relentlessly to justify Milwaukee winning......EVERY SINGLE GAME THEY PLAY!!!
Didn't he Pick Cincinnati +115yesterday to Win? .... I did
What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion with a beeper!
0
Quote Originally Posted by lajohn:
You would be more "credible"......if... "at-least-ONCE", you chose Milwaukee to lose a game, instead of trying relentlessly to justify Milwaukee winning......EVERY SINGLE GAME THEY PLAY!!!
Didn't he Pick Cincinnati +115yesterday to Win? .... I did
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.