While looking over today's schedule, I passively noted "Cubs win" on this one, probably because they have the better pitcher today and they lost yesterday, scoring but two runs although they hit several balls hard. So at the price, I figured "pass," as the Marlins have been playing well, too.
Then I returned to the game, noting Zambrano's surprisingly still- low (I thought) ERA. I did some number-crunching, and--sure enough--Zambrano has been more lucky than he has been good. His expected ERA (baseball statisticians refer to this as the xERA) is a full run over his actual ERA, in part because the hit rate is (overly) low against him, even as his Ks are down, and in part because he's stranded far more runners than his skill set would otherwise allow.
In other words, Zambrano is due for some correction. Granted, this doesn't happen in a single game, of course; but in his last outing he had a 100% strand rate, which included getting away with 4 BB in 7IP. Add that to the fact that the Marlins, while they whiff a lot, have been hitting well (though not overly so)--and the price. That seals the deal for me on this particular game.
I'll take the Marlins in Landshark Stadium for that kind of change.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
While looking over today's schedule, I passively noted "Cubs win" on this one, probably because they have the better pitcher today and they lost yesterday, scoring but two runs although they hit several balls hard. So at the price, I figured "pass," as the Marlins have been playing well, too.
Then I returned to the game, noting Zambrano's surprisingly still- low (I thought) ERA. I did some number-crunching, and--sure enough--Zambrano has been more lucky than he has been good. His expected ERA (baseball statisticians refer to this as the xERA) is a full run over his actual ERA, in part because the hit rate is (overly) low against him, even as his Ks are down, and in part because he's stranded far more runners than his skill set would otherwise allow.
In other words, Zambrano is due for some correction. Granted, this doesn't happen in a single game, of course; but in his last outing he had a 100% strand rate, which included getting away with 4 BB in 7IP. Add that to the fact that the Marlins, while they whiff a lot, have been hitting well (though not overly so)--and the price. That seals the deal for me on this particular game.
I'll take the Marlins in Landshark Stadium for that kind of change.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.