All Forums | MLB Betting

Derek Holland ...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1139
Posts: 24
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 11854
Posted: #1
What a freaking clown he is. His stupid gair and stache. He'll never be an elite pitcher. Doesn't have the mindset. You don't see Halladay or Hernandez doing Harry Caray voices and acting like a buffoon. 2 out of the last 3 days i have a team with a 4-0 lead  that gags
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 5354
Posted: #2
hey pack, if he doesn't start to win all the theatrics and shit go away.  he's young and very inconsistent.  but he's getting high odds b/c of that offense.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 11854
Posted: #3
dallas elite pitchers which i heard he was don't like ass clowns. He had a 4-0 Lead. Unacceptable i don't care if hes throwing with his feet.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #4
you took a sucker bet and you're now acting like a sucker. Take the loss and move on. Stevie Wonder could see the Rangers were not going to win this game
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 11854
Posted: #5
with a 4-0 lead smoke
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 5354
Posted: #6

Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:

you took a sucker bet and you're now acting like a sucker. Take the loss and move on. Stevie Wonder could see the Rangers were not going to win this game

Easy to say Sucker Bet after they lose, but the stros just play over their heads.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 11854
Posted: #7
thanks vike
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by dallasvike:

Easy to say Sucker Bet after they lose, but the stros just play over their heads.



this game had one of the bigger betting discrepancies Ive seen this year in bases. At one point prior to first pitch 98% if the action on this game was on the Rangers. That was enough for me to call it a sucker bet. Vegas does not give out freebies

 I hope all of the Thunder backers read this because they will lose as well.


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by packers1992:

with a 4-0 lead smoke


you cant be serious? How long have you wagered on baseball? Ive lost games with 5 run leads in the 9th. Everything Holland threw was belt high...his sinker was totally off and Ron kept him in there. It cost them
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 6810
Posted: #10
you're the sucker for thinking all of the worlds bet's are summed up and you get to see the #'s smoke...98% 

and this is from someone with not a dollar on this game. 
SELECTIVENESS=SUCCESS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2450
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:



this game had one of the bigger betting discrepancies Ive seen this year in bases. At one point prior to first pitch 98% if the action on this game was on the Rangers. That was enough for me to call it a sucker bet. Vegas does not give out freebies

 I hope all of the Thunder backers read this because they will lose as well.


so thats all you gotta do is read betting percentages
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 11854
Posted: #12
never once have i gone to into anyone s threads and said your picks suck or you deserved to lose. Now when i have a winning day i let it slide but come on smoke
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by packers1992:

never once have i gone to into anyone s threads and said your picks suck or you deserved to lose. Now when i have a winning day i let it slide but come on smoke


point out where I said his pick sucked or he deserved to lose? For those who do not know...a sucker bet is a "safe" less sharp wager. If you believe his pick suck then thats how YOU feel but I never typed that or thought that.  Baseball is not about picking the "safe" pick and its not about taking heavy favs neither.


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by KVEGAS:

you're the sucker for thinking all of the worlds bet's are summed up and you get to see the #'s smoke...98% 

and this is from someone with not a dollar on this game. 


you're right....I had no money on this game. 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by mtndew146:

so thats all you gotta do is read betting percentages


word to DonBest!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 6810
Posted: #16
I said I had no money on this game...

YOU'RE the one that thinks the books are telling you what percentages are bet on the games....

That's one of the funniest things I've ever heard!!!
SELECTIVENESS=SUCCESS
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by KVEGAS:

I said I had no money on this game...

YOU'RE the one that thinks the books are telling you what percentages are bet on the games....

That's one of the funniest things I've ever heard!!!

Not sure if serious

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 20033
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:



this game had one of the bigger betting discrepancies Ive seen this year in bases. At one point prior to first pitch 98% if the action on this game was on the Rangers. That was enough for me to call it a sucker bet. Vegas does not give out freebies

 I hope all of the Thunder backers read this because they will lose as well.



OKC..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2541
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:



this game had one of the bigger betting discrepancies Ive seen this year in bases. At one point prior to first pitch 98% if the action on this game was on the Rangers. That was enough for me to call it a sucker bet. Vegas does not give out freebies

 I hope all of the Thunder backers read this because they will lose as well.




yeah,,, the thunder surly lost too. so much for your percentages.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 6810
Posted: #20
Percentages don't show you how much money is wagered...10 people combined can bet more then a different 1000 people....


This is gambling 101....percentages don't mean shit....
SELECTIVENESS=SUCCESS
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by KVEGAS:

Percentages don't show you how much money is wagered...10 people combined can bet more then a different 1000 people....


This is gambling 101....percentages don't mean shit....

 you're right again...I guess Don Bests is useless. You got me again...you're very smart.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 6810
Posted: #22
No. You're very smart (Sarcasm intended)

That topic (fading the public)...

has been discussed/dissected/attempted thousands of times...always ends up in failure...

not a profitable tactic...public wins too.....

that's all you seem to bring to the table...very very amateurish...

If it worked everyone would do it! 
SELECTIVENESS=SUCCESS
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 6810
Posted: #23
I love people like you...you're fucken HILLARIOUS...

come out of the woodshed when "Fading the Public" has a profitable day...5-1 on sunday woop-dee-fucken-doo...

Why weren't you on the boards typing about how great your little tactic is when the "public" went 5-0 on friday night? 


You must have a "Fade the public on saturday" strategy you use 
SELECTIVENESS=SUCCESS
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #24

to the angry poster above...who said that fading the public was my tactic or only tactic? All I said was

'this game had one of the bigger betting discrepancies Ive seen this year in bases. At one point prior to first pitch 98% of the action on this game was on the Rangers. That was enough for me to call it a sucker bet. Vegas does not give out freebies'

and that was enough for you to cry and bitch for over 5 hours? So again...I'm not sure if you're serious?...but you're right and my involvment in this thread is over.

*Slowly backs out of thread laughing my ass off*

All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.