Angels are 16-1 in Ohtani's career when he starts as road chalk of -190 or less
10 straight wins as well.
Angels are -145 road chalk in game 1
Can you tell me where you found this stat?
Can you tell me where you found this stat?
@smellybunty
It is an account I follow on Twitter that gives out useful shit sometimes. Situational trends.
The guys that run killercappers that do the SDQL stuff, but it is a different twitter handle
idk if I am allowed to post it (the twitter handle) I am not promoting it, it is just free info that I think they compile and release to try and get people interested in SDQL subscriptions.
If you google that stuff above you will probably be able to find it. The trends are good info
The last one they gave me was a Chris Bassitt trend that I actually posted here as well, on the day after the Tigers no-hit the Jays a couple weeks ago if I remember correctly.........and that day the Jays won as well..........
I am still just figuring twitter out, so I probably miss some of what they release, but it seems like good stuff
@smellybunty
It is an account I follow on Twitter that gives out useful shit sometimes. Situational trends.
The guys that run killercappers that do the SDQL stuff, but it is a different twitter handle
idk if I am allowed to post it (the twitter handle) I am not promoting it, it is just free info that I think they compile and release to try and get people interested in SDQL subscriptions.
If you google that stuff above you will probably be able to find it. The trends are good info
The last one they gave me was a Chris Bassitt trend that I actually posted here as well, on the day after the Tigers no-hit the Jays a couple weeks ago if I remember correctly.........and that day the Jays won as well..........
I am still just figuring twitter out, so I probably miss some of what they release, but it seems like good stuff
@kapeto99
lol, I am not telling you to take anything to be honest........it is just a trend that has some teeth and is happening again today..........
these things are only as good as the next game, and they are never worth betting more or less than your usual amounts.
but yes, if you were going to follow the trend, you would take the Halos here
@kapeto99
lol, I am not telling you to take anything to be honest........it is just a trend that has some teeth and is happening again today..........
these things are only as good as the next game, and they are never worth betting more or less than your usual amounts.
but yes, if you were going to follow the trend, you would take the Halos here
@kapeto99
I know it is 6-0 and we are cruising..............but there are still 6 outs left for Detroit.......and bullpens steal units
Believe me I want them to win too..........I am on the ML and the RL for 3 total units between both of my books..........so I am with ya........but the jinx is real
I even have the Angels in a parlay with the Mets...........and I almost never do parlays........idk what tf I was thinking this morning tbh........
@kapeto99
I know it is 6-0 and we are cruising..............but there are still 6 outs left for Detroit.......and bullpens steal units
Believe me I want them to win too..........I am on the ML and the RL for 3 total units between both of my books..........so I am with ya........but the jinx is real
I even have the Angels in a parlay with the Mets...........and I almost never do parlays........idk what tf I was thinking this morning tbh........
@kapeto99
The only other game I am on today is the Mets ML, and it is only the 2nd half of the parlay with the Angels which pays +158. Small parlay.
I wouldn't lay -206 for the Mets ML by itself at this point, even though I think they win. I would either do the -1.5 or at worst the -1......but again.......the only reason I included them is because it was +158 with the Halos.
I doubt I will play anything else. Even if the Mets lose I am still up enough. I don't like giving it back. I am stingy with it. lol
@kapeto99
The only other game I am on today is the Mets ML, and it is only the 2nd half of the parlay with the Angels which pays +158. Small parlay.
I wouldn't lay -206 for the Mets ML by itself at this point, even though I think they win. I would either do the -1.5 or at worst the -1......but again.......the only reason I included them is because it was +158 with the Halos.
I doubt I will play anything else. Even if the Mets lose I am still up enough. I don't like giving it back. I am stingy with it. lol
@JDD
"Angels are 16-1 in Ohtani's career when he starts as road chalk of -190 or less
10 straight wins as well."
_____________________________
You mean, 17 - 1....LOL.
Good job posting this stat.
Let us know when you have more. :)
@JDD
"Angels are 16-1 in Ohtani's career when he starts as road chalk of -190 or less
10 straight wins as well."
_____________________________
You mean, 17 - 1....LOL.
Good job posting this stat.
Let us know when you have more. :)
angels
mets/angels
nice easy day (or 2 days with the rain delay, woke up to the 2-1 winner)
Looks like the mets traded Robertson during the rain delay......getting rid of players when you are 7 games back of the wild card with 60 games left seems premature, but I am not a front office member so what do I know.
Wish the Yankees would do the same and start planning for the future......except nobody would probably want any of our players......
The Mets are still paying $48 million in retained dead payroll..........The Reds 26 man roster payroll is $48 million. Rays $61M. O's $46M. That free agency is a double edged sword.
angels
mets/angels
nice easy day (or 2 days with the rain delay, woke up to the 2-1 winner)
Looks like the mets traded Robertson during the rain delay......getting rid of players when you are 7 games back of the wild card with 60 games left seems premature, but I am not a front office member so what do I know.
Wish the Yankees would do the same and start planning for the future......except nobody would probably want any of our players......
The Mets are still paying $48 million in retained dead payroll..........The Reds 26 man roster payroll is $48 million. Rays $61M. O's $46M. That free agency is a double edged sword.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.