Your relatives you are stuck with; but all others you may like, dislike, or ignore as you choose.
Season, 26-23-9 - + $1,948.62 - +12.1% RoR
5/16 - $358 each – flat bets - [3% of bankroll, 10,000 +/- profit/loss]
FG Athletics +101 – Bassitt/Maeda
Comment: I do not know why bettors are chasing Maeda and the Twins. If you figure it out let me know. Not the same Maeda, not the same Twins, and none of their performances to date indicate they are ready to rebound.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Your relatives you are stuck with; but all others you may like, dislike, or ignore as you choose.
Season, 26-23-9 - + $1,948.62 - +12.1% RoR
5/16 - $358 each – flat bets - [3% of bankroll, 10,000 +/- profit/loss]
FG Athletics +101 – Bassitt/Maeda
Comment: I do not know why bettors are chasing Maeda and the Twins. If you figure it out let me know. Not the same Maeda, not the same Twins, and none of their performances to date indicate they are ready to rebound.
Your relatives you are stuck with; but all others you may like, dislike, or ignore as you choose. Season, 26-23-9 - + $1,948.62 - +12.1% RoR 5/16 - $358 each – flat bets - [3% of bankroll, 10,000 +/- profit/loss] FG Athletics +101 – Bassitt/Maeda Comment: I do not know why bettors are chasing Maeda and the Twins. If you figure it out let me know. Not the same Maeda, not the same Twins, and none of their performances to date indicate they are ready to rebound.
Im not sure the support is to Maeda as much as it is to the home team. Just a guess but I wouldn't bet against the A's anytime soon.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Your relatives you are stuck with; but all others you may like, dislike, or ignore as you choose. Season, 26-23-9 - + $1,948.62 - +12.1% RoR 5/16 - $358 each – flat bets - [3% of bankroll, 10,000 +/- profit/loss] FG Athletics +101 – Bassitt/Maeda Comment: I do not know why bettors are chasing Maeda and the Twins. If you figure it out let me know. Not the same Maeda, not the same Twins, and none of their performances to date indicate they are ready to rebound.
Im not sure the support is to Maeda as much as it is to the home team. Just a guess but I wouldn't bet against the A's anytime soon.
Comment: Cardinals 5-2 versus left-handed starters with far better offensive projections than Padres. A slight, but not significant, edge to Kim over Weathers.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
F5 – Cardinals +105 – Kim/Weathers
Comment: Cardinals 5-2 versus left-handed starters with far better offensive projections than Padres. A slight, but not significant, edge to Kim over Weathers.
Really it looks like Weathers is good for 2 or 3 innings so it might depend on who the Padres bring in second is where you get the win, Oakland game another one of those that shows you that you have to play the whole game to get your winner.
0
@KeyElement
Really it looks like Weathers is good for 2 or 3 innings so it might depend on who the Padres bring in second is where you get the win, Oakland game another one of those that shows you that you have to play the whole game to get your winner.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.