The situation in
Chicago reverses today as the Cubs must face a strong right handed pitcher, a
situation that saw them go into the break at 1-9 last 10 and 6-14 their last
20. The lefty Perez was ideal for them, but not a strong righty like Darvish.
Phillies -101, Verrett/Eickhoff
Verrett is the
bottom of the Mets rotation while Eickhoff is an above average prospect that
has established himself with a 10-8 quality start record and his team went into
the break hitting righty very well. Colon shut them down last night, but I
doubt Verrett can do the same.
Royals -115, Duffy/Pelfrey
Duffy is the sweet
surprise for the Royals this year. He was groomed to be a starter and this time
around (finally!) it looks like he may stay out of the pen and stick in the
rotation. The Tigers hold the offensive matchup edge here but it is light years
shy of Duffy over Pelfrey, and therefore no surprise Duffy is favored.
BOL
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
MLB – 2016
115-111-1, + $+699.93, +1.54%
RoR
7/15, 2-1, +220.67
7/16 Flat $200.00
Rangers +131, Darvish/Hammel
The situation in
Chicago reverses today as the Cubs must face a strong right handed pitcher, a
situation that saw them go into the break at 1-9 last 10 and 6-14 their last
20. The lefty Perez was ideal for them, but not a strong righty like Darvish.
Phillies -101, Verrett/Eickhoff
Verrett is the
bottom of the Mets rotation while Eickhoff is an above average prospect that
has established himself with a 10-8 quality start record and his team went into
the break hitting righty very well. Colon shut them down last night, but I
doubt Verrett can do the same.
Royals -115, Duffy/Pelfrey
Duffy is the sweet
surprise for the Royals this year. He was groomed to be a starter and this time
around (finally!) it looks like he may stay out of the pen and stick in the
rotation. The Tigers hold the offensive matchup edge here but it is light years
shy of Duffy over Pelfrey, and therefore no surprise Duffy is favored.
GL withthe Phils today. They let me down yesterday. I took a hard look,at the Royals today but their offense scared me away and Pelfry steered me from the Tigers
0
GL withthe Phils today. They let me down yesterday. I took a hard look,at the Royals today but their offense scared me away and Pelfry steered me from the Tigers
GL withthe Phils today. They let me down yesterday. I took a hard look,at the Royals today but their offense scared me away and Pelfry steered me from the Tigers
Doctor Pelfrey knows how to cure an ailing offense.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by cjm2008:
GL withthe Phils today. They let me down yesterday. I took a hard look,at the Royals today but their offense scared me away and Pelfry steered me from the Tigers
Doctor Pelfrey knows how to cure an ailing offense.
Like that Rangers line. I capped them with a 48.8% win probability (+105). Would be playable for me at that price, but I was tired and lazy and didn't look at the lines until the market wised up and drove the line down.
Good luck
0
Like that Rangers line. I capped them with a 48.8% win probability (+105). Would be playable for me at that price, but I was tired and lazy and didn't look at the lines until the market wised up and drove the line down.
Like that Rangers line. I capped them with a 48.8% win probability (+105). Would be playable for me at that price, but I was tired and lazy and didn't look at the lines until the market wised up and drove the line down.
Good luck
Be careful what you post, buddy. Now when you don't get the best possible line some folks will say "hmm, tired and lazy again?"
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by BirdsOnBat:
Like that Rangers line. I capped them with a 48.8% win probability (+105). Would be playable for me at that price, but I was tired and lazy and didn't look at the lines until the market wised up and drove the line down.
Good luck
Be careful what you post, buddy. Now when you don't get the best possible line some folks will say "hmm, tired and lazy again?"
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.