Going back to 2000, teams that are shutout in game 1 of the League Championship Series are 6-4 (60.0%) in game 2. That includes road teams that are 1-2 (33.3%). That means, in the analysis I just created, the smaller subset of 33.3% should regress closer to the overall 60.0%.
Mets ML +130
If you thought that was good analysis, wait, there’s more:
2. Guardians at Yankees
The following is updated after the Dodgers win:
Going back to 2014, in the first game of the league series:
Teams that played the most division series games:
4-9 (30.8%)
Guardians: 3-2
Yankees: 3-1
Teams that played most recently:
5-9 (35.7%)
Guardians: 2 days ago
Yankees: 4 days ago
By my analysis that I just created, since the Dodgers won, the Guardians should lose to make the regression (1-1) closer to the overall percentages.
Yankees ML -166
As always, fade or fade.
Good luck!
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Yesterday 0-1, but I was close
Playoffs 12-10 (54.6%)
1. Mets at Dodgers
Going back to 2000, teams that are shutout in game 1 of the League Championship Series are 6-4 (60.0%) in game 2. That includes road teams that are 1-2 (33.3%). That means, in the analysis I just created, the smaller subset of 33.3% should regress closer to the overall 60.0%.
Mets ML +130
If you thought that was good analysis, wait, there’s more:
2. Guardians at Yankees
The following is updated after the Dodgers win:
Going back to 2014, in the first game of the league series:
Teams that played the most division series games:
4-9 (30.8%)
Guardians: 3-2
Yankees: 3-1
Teams that played most recently:
5-9 (35.7%)
Guardians: 2 days ago
Yankees: 4 days ago
By my analysis that I just created, since the Dodgers won, the Guardians should lose to make the regression (1-1) closer to the overall percentages.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
