Still believing so no fades today really like tam as my favorite pick I mean how can you have an atomic pod against undefeated sd, imanaga that’s how. Gl
Record treats each pick as 1u wagers
Atomic pod:
Pod: -118-120: 0-2 -2.38
104: 2-0 2.09
200: 0-1 -1.00
A:-170: 0-1 -1.70
-140-145: 2-0 2.00
-115-124: 1-1 -.24
100-114: 110-129: 1-2 -1.10
150-200: 0-3(1) -3.00
B: -1 -121: 0-0-1 0.00
-100-125: 4-3 .50
107-125: 1-3 -1.80
140-195: 0-4 -4.00
1.5 -120: 1-0 1.00
104: 0-1 -1.00
C: -1 -141: 0-1 -1.41
-160: 0-1 -1.60
-120 -125: 2-1 .8
105-125: 4-2 2.75
150-170: 0-2 -2.00
Then I look at U & the worlds alright with me just 1 look at U & I kno its gona B a lovely
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Stl 110 alt B .6u wagers (.4u insurance)
Chc -167 atomic pod
Nym -130 B
Col 108 C
Sea 125 C (.4u is bonus)
Was 125 C
Bal -105 A
Tam 115 pod
Cin -104 A
Still believing so no fades today really like tam as my favorite pick I mean how can you have an atomic pod against undefeated sd, imanaga that’s how. Gl
Yes and there are better atomic pods but this meets the highest criteria it was perfect in its purest form from a couple of perspectives not the best sample size like 8-0 5-0 4-0 for how chc do in this situation in the past 4 years and then my system for the other two which mostly looks at win streaks of all teams. I am adding money to the chc and tam bets but I don’t want to go too crazy at -165 you need to risk a lot to win some but it’s not a ridiculous line that needs to be -1 or -1.5 to have value. And I don’t want to cry if it loses lol I’m starting the parlay error but 2 is the perfect number for parlays because it actually hits. Tam was 11-4 at first glance but it has pedestrian numbers looking at how each team does. So far pods/A haven’t done well but again small sample size.
Parlay chc 1 tam 1 130 .2u
Then I look at U & the worlds alright with me just 1 look at U & I kno its gona B a lovely
0
Yes and there are better atomic pods but this meets the highest criteria it was perfect in its purest form from a couple of perspectives not the best sample size like 8-0 5-0 4-0 for how chc do in this situation in the past 4 years and then my system for the other two which mostly looks at win streaks of all teams. I am adding money to the chc and tam bets but I don’t want to go too crazy at -165 you need to risk a lot to win some but it’s not a ridiculous line that needs to be -1 or -1.5 to have value. And I don’t want to cry if it loses lol I’m starting the parlay error but 2 is the perfect number for parlays because it actually hits. Tam was 11-4 at first glance but it has pedestrian numbers looking at how each team does. So far pods/A haven’t done well but again small sample size.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.