Oakland A's just got ROBBED of a gametying homerun in the 9th

Question

Called a double initially then reviewed and it clearly is a HR. Umpires call it a double. Go figure

YELAWOLF · Answer

Called a double initially then reviewed and it clearly is a HR. Umpires call it a double. Go figure

lennon65 · Answer

i have over lol

Otops · Answer

Brutal call!!!  Even replays aren&#x27;t being called correctly this year.  WoW!!!

jasonwhitesknee · Answer

Had the over 8.5, Oak TT ov 3.5 and OAK tt ov 3.5 as third pick in winning parlay.

jasonwhitesknee · Answer

That was my worst beat ever and I been doing this a long time

Rocafella · Answer

Andddddd I had the A&#x27;s team total over 3.5hahahahahahaha.  This is a new one.JESUS.

Tigermike1975 · Answer

They need to get rid of replay if they can&#x27;t find a way to get such obvious calls right. It was clear as day that the ball hit that rail behind the fence and changed directions. Figures it was Angel Hernandez&#x27;s crew, he is brutal anyhow and this whole crew should be asha,Ed of themselves. There needs to be repercussions against these guys for missing such an easy call.

gofish3 · Answer

100% blown call.Ball hit off the railing over the wall. Super slow mo, blew it up, ball drilled it. This gives replay a bad rap.

KobezKing · Answer

these umps better b fined and or suspended. he&#x27;s a fukkin crook

Rocafella · Answer

Yup A&#x27;s team total last leg of a 4 team parlay for me, that burns deep.  Jesus Fu cking Christ that is AWFUL.

Vanrush · Answer

Even the A&#x27;s announcer Ray Fosse didn&#x27;t get it right....he thought it hit the top of the wall and bounce UP then back onto the field!  LOL he was duped by the video truck playing then rewinding the ball as it hit....LOL What an idiot!

Bling · Answer

ESPN Conversation is blowing up right now about it.  Is there a video of it?

tuttleberry · Answer

Looking back at this game : total was 8.5. Final was 4-3. The wrong call cost the over. Didn't know that the total was in the balance 2 days ago.

MLB has stated that Angel Hernandez had the benefit of seeing home and away feeds, so he had the right look and the benefit of super slo-mo.

Not saying Hernandez was bought, but the fact that money was in the balance on the call makes it even higher profile than you would think.

Tigermike1975 · Answer

Or maybe Hernandez had Cleveland and/or the under.

tuttleberry · Answer

Also wanted to mentioned how Gammons said on the air that when you look at the replay, it's impossible to look at the footage and rule "double", so the only thing left to discuss is Hernandez's motive for intentionally getting the call wrong, not that he innocently mad a mistake!

All I can say is "Wow!" and it's about time the guys in the media come clean and entertain foul play. It's insulting for people to tell us this instance is simply a "bad call"

drum67 · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by tuttleberry] &#xD;&#xA;Looking back at this game : total was 8.5. Final was 4-3. The wrong call cost the over. Didn&#x27;t know that the total was in the balance 2 days ago.&#xD;&#xA;MLB has stated that Angel Hernandez had the benefit of seeing home and away feeds, so he had the right look and the benefit of super slo-mo.&#xD;&#xA;Not saying Hernandez was bought, but the fact that money was in the balance on the call makes it even higher profile than you would think.[/Quote]I saw a black helicopter fly over the stadium as the call was being made.

drum67 · Answer

It&#x27;s George Bush&#x27;s fault.

Riceboi · Answer

obvious mistakes like this are the only things that make me think games are called certain ways. but if this game was fixed the score would of been way more lopsided i think

Oakland A's just got ROBBED of a gametying homerun in the 9th

Hot Forum Topics