I got hammered yesterday: lost all five games in which I bet the favorite, including Johnson, Price and Lincecum. I did go 3-0 on my underdog picks, so clearly I am having better luck there. I have been really pleased overall in the % getting the outcome of my side's starting pitcher correct, but have had my fair share of late inning heroics and snafus. So, I will focus more on the dogs for now, where I can only lose 1 unit and get paid big if the play comes through for me.
CINCINNATI (Cueto) @ CHICAGO CUBS (Wells) PICK: REDS -115 Cueto comes into this game with 3 straight terrific starts, and he is facing a Cubs team that simply cannot win baseball games, no matter who is starting for them.
=====
UNDERDOG SPECIAL NEW YORK METS (Dickey) @ WASHINGTON (Strasburg) PICK: METS +170 The market is still overvaluing the obvious talents of Mr. Strasburg, and is ignoring his 100 pitch limit and the inevitable reliance on the Nationals pen. There is no reason to expect anything less than another sensational outing from Strasburg, but as I have emphasized many times before, he will likely be limited to pitching no more than 7, 6 or even 5 innings. Although the Nationals pen is one of the better in baseball, as measured by ERA, the pen has struggled lately and has not been helped by the fielding either. Facing the Nationals, we have RA Dickey who has surprised us with his effectiveness. I have been waiting for his blowup and we got that his last start, and hopefully he will return to form tomorrow. I anticipate a close battle between the starters, which means I am basically betting Mets +170 from the 7th inning stretch to rest of the game.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL SEATTLE (Vargas) @ DETROIT (Verlander) PICK: MARINERS +170 This is my 3rd straight underdog pick on the Mariners, who leave Yankee stadium winning 2 of 3, with the lone loss being a nail-biter to -400 Sabathia. I realize that Verlander is a better home pitcher, but for the season, the stats and game log show that Vargas has been better and more consistent. The Mariners also bring a 0.291 team BA against Verlander into this game.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL BALTIMORE (Guthrie) @ BOSTON (Lester) PICK: ORIOLES +270 This is the longest shot of my underdog picks but here is why. You can say this about Guthrie: he tends to give you a quality start in over 67% of his starts. And he faces a Red Sox lineup that is now seriously depleted by injury. The Orioles are facing the best Sox pitcher, and the most I can realistically hope for is a few scattered runs, or an improbable blowup by Lester. However, if I am right that the Red Sox will be challenged to score runs, I think that the Orioles can squeak out a lead, in time for us to keep our fingers crossed for the bullpen to close.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL KC ROYALS (Chen) @ LA ANGELS (Santana) PICK: ROYALS +165 I am back on the Royals for the 2nd straight night. Statistically, Chen and Santana are nearly the same in terms of ERA and WHIP. Chen has been a gritty pitcher, making the most of his talents, to keep the Royals in the game. While I don't like this 25:39 BB:K ratio, he allows less than 1 hit per inning and his K/9 IP is nearly 1, which means that he can pitch out of trouble. Santana has been the more inconsistent of the two pitchers and opponents bat 0.272 against him. The Royals as a team have the #1 batting average in baseball, which means they are always dangerous to get runners on base and score runs.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL SF GIANTS (Zito) @ COLORADO (Jimenez) PICK: GIANTS +185 Zito has pitched well for most of the season including a strong start against the Rockies earlier this year. As a team, the Rockies are hitting only 0.205 against him in 210 AB. Jimenez has been outstanding this year, but has struggled in his last two starts. I have often pointed out that you assume he finishes the year with an ERA of just 2.5, that means he will have to average 3.5 the rest of the way -- the law of averages will have to come into play at some point.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I got hammered yesterday: lost all five games in which I bet the favorite, including Johnson, Price and Lincecum. I did go 3-0 on my underdog picks, so clearly I am having better luck there. I have been really pleased overall in the % getting the outcome of my side's starting pitcher correct, but have had my fair share of late inning heroics and snafus. So, I will focus more on the dogs for now, where I can only lose 1 unit and get paid big if the play comes through for me.
CINCINNATI (Cueto) @ CHICAGO CUBS (Wells) PICK: REDS -115 Cueto comes into this game with 3 straight terrific starts, and he is facing a Cubs team that simply cannot win baseball games, no matter who is starting for them.
=====
UNDERDOG SPECIAL NEW YORK METS (Dickey) @ WASHINGTON (Strasburg) PICK: METS +170 The market is still overvaluing the obvious talents of Mr. Strasburg, and is ignoring his 100 pitch limit and the inevitable reliance on the Nationals pen. There is no reason to expect anything less than another sensational outing from Strasburg, but as I have emphasized many times before, he will likely be limited to pitching no more than 7, 6 or even 5 innings. Although the Nationals pen is one of the better in baseball, as measured by ERA, the pen has struggled lately and has not been helped by the fielding either. Facing the Nationals, we have RA Dickey who has surprised us with his effectiveness. I have been waiting for his blowup and we got that his last start, and hopefully he will return to form tomorrow. I anticipate a close battle between the starters, which means I am basically betting Mets +170 from the 7th inning stretch to rest of the game.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL SEATTLE (Vargas) @ DETROIT (Verlander) PICK: MARINERS +170 This is my 3rd straight underdog pick on the Mariners, who leave Yankee stadium winning 2 of 3, with the lone loss being a nail-biter to -400 Sabathia. I realize that Verlander is a better home pitcher, but for the season, the stats and game log show that Vargas has been better and more consistent. The Mariners also bring a 0.291 team BA against Verlander into this game.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL BALTIMORE (Guthrie) @ BOSTON (Lester) PICK: ORIOLES +270 This is the longest shot of my underdog picks but here is why. You can say this about Guthrie: he tends to give you a quality start in over 67% of his starts. And he faces a Red Sox lineup that is now seriously depleted by injury. The Orioles are facing the best Sox pitcher, and the most I can realistically hope for is a few scattered runs, or an improbable blowup by Lester. However, if I am right that the Red Sox will be challenged to score runs, I think that the Orioles can squeak out a lead, in time for us to keep our fingers crossed for the bullpen to close.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL KC ROYALS (Chen) @ LA ANGELS (Santana) PICK: ROYALS +165 I am back on the Royals for the 2nd straight night. Statistically, Chen and Santana are nearly the same in terms of ERA and WHIP. Chen has been a gritty pitcher, making the most of his talents, to keep the Royals in the game. While I don't like this 25:39 BB:K ratio, he allows less than 1 hit per inning and his K/9 IP is nearly 1, which means that he can pitch out of trouble. Santana has been the more inconsistent of the two pitchers and opponents bat 0.272 against him. The Royals as a team have the #1 batting average in baseball, which means they are always dangerous to get runners on base and score runs.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL SF GIANTS (Zito) @ COLORADO (Jimenez) PICK: GIANTS +185 Zito has pitched well for most of the season including a strong start against the Rockies earlier this year. As a team, the Rockies are hitting only 0.205 against him in 210 AB. Jimenez has been outstanding this year, but has struggled in his last two starts. I have often pointed out that you assume he finishes the year with an ERA of just 2.5, that means he will have to average 3.5 the rest of the way -- the law of averages will have to come into play at some point.
I like these dog plays, i agree with your analysis on all of them except for the mets. Strasberg is a beast, the mets do not have the left handed bats to get to him. Dickey is a complete anomoly, he is over 30 and been kicking around for quite some time. The problem with dickey is he was never good, the blow up was overdue. if you really look at his starts he put a ton of guys on base and pitched out of it which is good for the moment but with a gas can like him he cannot do that forever. He got torched in his last, the nats hit him well their one time against him and he is probably going to get tagged again. Between Dickey"s chances of blowing up again and that Strasberg will most likely throw less pitches and go at least 7, i don't see your angle working for you on this game. Some people are saying this line is ridiculous, i think the line is right, when they had Straberg at -220+ in his first couple that was ridiculous. 170-180 against dickey and a suspect mets team on the road, about right. BOL msohn, you go .500 on these plays and you will have a nice day.
0
I like these dog plays, i agree with your analysis on all of them except for the mets. Strasberg is a beast, the mets do not have the left handed bats to get to him. Dickey is a complete anomoly, he is over 30 and been kicking around for quite some time. The problem with dickey is he was never good, the blow up was overdue. if you really look at his starts he put a ton of guys on base and pitched out of it which is good for the moment but with a gas can like him he cannot do that forever. He got torched in his last, the nats hit him well their one time against him and he is probably going to get tagged again. Between Dickey"s chances of blowing up again and that Strasberg will most likely throw less pitches and go at least 7, i don't see your angle working for you on this game. Some people are saying this line is ridiculous, i think the line is right, when they had Straberg at -220+ in his first couple that was ridiculous. 170-180 against dickey and a suspect mets team on the road, about right. BOL msohn, you go .500 on these plays and you will have a nice day.
BOL. I'm on the other side for the Cin/Cubs game. That line reeks. Cin is hot and hitting, Chicago is cold and can't even spell the word "hit" right now. You have Cueto, who so far has a great season statistically against Wells, who is winless in the past 11 tries. Oh, let's not forget about the atrocity yesterday. Yet Cin opened at -115 only? Perhaps I'm reading too much into this, but I just can't bet Cin today (took Cin yesterday as you know)
BTW, thanks for the kind words yesterday. I didn't have a chance to reply.
0
BOL. I'm on the other side for the Cin/Cubs game. That line reeks. Cin is hot and hitting, Chicago is cold and can't even spell the word "hit" right now. You have Cueto, who so far has a great season statistically against Wells, who is winless in the past 11 tries. Oh, let's not forget about the atrocity yesterday. Yet Cin opened at -115 only? Perhaps I'm reading too much into this, but I just can't bet Cin today (took Cin yesterday as you know)
BTW, thanks for the kind words yesterday. I didn't have a chance to reply.
BOL. I'm on the other side for the Cin/Cubs game. That line reeks. Cin is hot and hitting, Chicago is cold and can't even spell the word "hit" right now. You have Cueto, who so far has a great season statistically against Wells, who is winless in the past 11 tries. Oh, let's not forget about the atrocity yesterday. Yet Cin opened at -115 only? Perhaps I'm reading too much into this, but I just can't bet Cin today (took Cin yesterday as you know)
BTW, thanks for the kind words yesterday. I didn't have a chance to reply.
Nice call on the Cubs. I also read other poster's comments that the line looked fishy. I should have listened to that but my gig is playing the obvious statistical trends. I'll definitely try to keep the "is this too good to be true" check in mind in the future.
0
Quote Originally Posted by UT_Howie:
BOL. I'm on the other side for the Cin/Cubs game. That line reeks. Cin is hot and hitting, Chicago is cold and can't even spell the word "hit" right now. You have Cueto, who so far has a great season statistically against Wells, who is winless in the past 11 tries. Oh, let's not forget about the atrocity yesterday. Yet Cin opened at -115 only? Perhaps I'm reading too much into this, but I just can't bet Cin today (took Cin yesterday as you know)
BTW, thanks for the kind words yesterday. I didn't have a chance to reply.
Nice call on the Cubs. I also read other poster's comments that the line looked fishy. I should have listened to that but my gig is playing the obvious statistical trends. I'll definitely try to keep the "is this too good to be true" check in mind in the future.
I finished the day 3-3 with a $65 loss. I definitely benefited from my 2-3 underdog plays (+$50) but card had a huge swing from the Mets implosion. Could have had a 4-2 day with $205 otherwise.
CINCINNATI (Cueto) @ CHICAGO CUBS
(Wells) PICK: REDS -115 I went into this game really pumped on the low juice despite the differing paths of the Reds and Cubs and recent outings from Cueto. Smarter guys pointed to the fact that the line was fishy and I ignored the warnings. I will definitely keep a watch for this in the future.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL NEW YORK METS (Dickey) @ WASHINGTON
(Strasburg) PICK: METS +170 I got exactly what I wanted early on -- A couple of runs and #37 being forced to throw 37 pitches to get out of the first inning. The major WTF implosion by K-Rod really hurt as it swung the big dog win into a loss. Dickey was great again. I just saw the game recap on Baseball Tonight and not a word on Dickey.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL SEATTLE (Vargas) @ DETROIT (Verlander) PICK: MARINERS +170 I played against Verlander at home and took another dog loss. The big disappointment here was that I did not the outing I was hoping for from Vargas.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL BALTIMORE (Guthrie) @ BOSTON (Lester) PICK: ORIOLES +270 Lester continued his dominance of the Orioles.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL KC
ROYALS (Chen) @ LA ANGELS (Santana) PICK: ROYALS
+165 Bruce Chen was on a perfect game watch, really? Chen continues to deliver strong starts and always give the dogs the chance to win. Nice win here.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL SF
GIANTS (Zito) @ COLORADO (Jimenez) PICK: GIANTS
+185 For a moment, I was sweating the possibility of losing another WTF outcome.
0
I finished the day 3-3 with a $65 loss. I definitely benefited from my 2-3 underdog plays (+$50) but card had a huge swing from the Mets implosion. Could have had a 4-2 day with $205 otherwise.
CINCINNATI (Cueto) @ CHICAGO CUBS
(Wells) PICK: REDS -115 I went into this game really pumped on the low juice despite the differing paths of the Reds and Cubs and recent outings from Cueto. Smarter guys pointed to the fact that the line was fishy and I ignored the warnings. I will definitely keep a watch for this in the future.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL NEW YORK METS (Dickey) @ WASHINGTON
(Strasburg) PICK: METS +170 I got exactly what I wanted early on -- A couple of runs and #37 being forced to throw 37 pitches to get out of the first inning. The major WTF implosion by K-Rod really hurt as it swung the big dog win into a loss. Dickey was great again. I just saw the game recap on Baseball Tonight and not a word on Dickey.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL SEATTLE (Vargas) @ DETROIT (Verlander) PICK: MARINERS +170 I played against Verlander at home and took another dog loss. The big disappointment here was that I did not the outing I was hoping for from Vargas.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL BALTIMORE (Guthrie) @ BOSTON (Lester) PICK: ORIOLES +270 Lester continued his dominance of the Orioles.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL KC
ROYALS (Chen) @ LA ANGELS (Santana) PICK: ROYALS
+165 Bruce Chen was on a perfect game watch, really? Chen continues to deliver strong starts and always give the dogs the chance to win. Nice win here.
UNDERDOG SPECIAL SF
GIANTS (Zito) @ COLORADO (Jimenez) PICK: GIANTS
+185 For a moment, I was sweating the possibility of losing another WTF outcome.
so it seems liek underdogs most liekly making the profit for you now ? because this is interesting.
This is correct: All of my profits have come from the dogs. I realize that everybody has "bad" losses, but I have had a few crazy endings that have not resulted in my favor, such as the Mets (K-Rod implosion) today and the Heilman gaffe a few nights ago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jimmiee:
so it seems liek underdogs most liekly making the profit for you now ? because this is interesting.
This is correct: All of my profits have come from the dogs. I realize that everybody has "bad" losses, but I have had a few crazy endings that have not resulted in my favor, such as the Mets (K-Rod implosion) today and the Heilman gaffe a few nights ago.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.