DIDN't do too bad but forgot to total up W/L in SAT post
Get to it later as its really HISTORY NOW
KENDRICK/is 5-1-0 in 5 innings and 5-1 in 9 innings of last 6 STARTS
PEREZ is ,2-1-3,in 5 and 3-3 last 6
PLAY,KENDRICK in 5 and 9
COOK is,3-2-1 in 5 innings,,and 4-2 in 9 last 6
HENDRICKSON,is 0-5-0 in 5 and 1-4 in 9 inn
PLAY COOK in 5 and 9 INNINGS
GARLAND is 3-3-0 in 5 and 3-3 in 9 of last 6
LITSCH is,2-4-0 in 5 and 1-5 in 9 in last 6
PLAY GARLAND in 9 only
ROBERTSON is,2-3-1 in 5 and 4-2 in 9 ( GREAT TEAM SUPPORT)
R SMITH 0-1-0 in 5 and 0-1 in 9
ROBERTSON in 9 only
FEW LEANS because other SP not many starts and to date not good YET
WELLEMEYER,in 5 inn,2-3-1,and in 9 inn 2-4 (Pretty Bad)
MARSHALL,2 starts, in 5 inn 0-2-0 and 9 inn,0-2
pretty bad too
not playing this just thought i'd throw it out there
ONE REALLY UGLY MATCHUP
BANKS,in 5 inn,2-2-1 and in 9 inn,1-4
JOHNSON,in 5 inn,1-5-0 and in 9 inn,0-6
PLAY BANKS
MAYBE the OVER is a GREAT PLAY
WHAT you guys think ?????? only problem DB not supporting their BEST SP so will they support their WORST ones ???????????
THATS all i see today as bal appear of EQUAL matchups but always looking for assistance
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
DIDN't do too bad but forgot to total up W/L in SAT post
Get to it later as its really HISTORY NOW
KENDRICK/is 5-1-0 in 5 innings and 5-1 in 9 innings of last 6 STARTS
PEREZ is ,2-1-3,in 5 and 3-3 last 6
PLAY,KENDRICK in 5 and 9
COOK is,3-2-1 in 5 innings,,and 4-2 in 9 last 6
HENDRICKSON,is 0-5-0 in 5 and 1-4 in 9 inn
PLAY COOK in 5 and 9 INNINGS
GARLAND is 3-3-0 in 5 and 3-3 in 9 of last 6
LITSCH is,2-4-0 in 5 and 1-5 in 9 in last 6
PLAY GARLAND in 9 only
ROBERTSON is,2-3-1 in 5 and 4-2 in 9 ( GREAT TEAM SUPPORT)
R SMITH 0-1-0 in 5 and 0-1 in 9
ROBERTSON in 9 only
FEW LEANS because other SP not many starts and to date not good YET
WELLEMEYER,in 5 inn,2-3-1,and in 9 inn 2-4 (Pretty Bad)
MARSHALL,2 starts, in 5 inn 0-2-0 and 9 inn,0-2
pretty bad too
not playing this just thought i'd throw it out there
ONE REALLY UGLY MATCHUP
BANKS,in 5 inn,2-2-1 and in 9 inn,1-4
JOHNSON,in 5 inn,1-5-0 and in 9 inn,0-6
PLAY BANKS
MAYBE the OVER is a GREAT PLAY
WHAT you guys think ?????? only problem DB not supporting their BEST SP so will they support their WORST ones ???????????
THATS all i see today as bal appear of EQUAL matchups but always looking for assistance
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
forgot one
VOLQUEZ was my best play for qute a while but lately he's faltering
in 5 inn,3-3-0 and in 9 inn,3-3
NATS has this new kid,BALLASTER, who has pitched well and in 5 hes',1-0-0 and 9 is 1-0
UNDECIDED who to take so NP for me
0
forgot one
VOLQUEZ was my best play for qute a while but lately he's faltering
in 5 inn,3-3-0 and in 9 inn,3-3
NATS has this new kid,BALLASTER, who has pitched well and in 5 hes',1-0-0 and 9 is 1-0
UNDECIDED who to take so NP for me
one note i like KENDRICK in 9 better as PEREZ in 5 is 2-1-3 whick if you take the PUSHES and add to wins he's pretty equal to Kendrick but falls badly in 9 so the better play is the 9 inning play IMO
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
one note i like KENDRICK in 9 better as PEREZ in 5 is 2-1-3 whick if you take the PUSHES and add to wins he's pretty equal to Kendrick but falls badly in 9 so the better play is the 9 inning play IMO
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
slight error
ONE REALLY UGLY MATCHUP
*
BANKS,in 5 inn, ( 2-1-2 = 4-1 ) and in 9 inn,1-4
JOHNSON,in 5 inn,1-5-0 and in 9 inn,0-6
PLAY BANKS * (esp in 5 innings )
COOK - 180 need to parlay him or RL him
LATER
0
slight error
ONE REALLY UGLY MATCHUP
*
BANKS,in 5 inn, ( 2-1-2 = 4-1 ) and in 9 inn,1-4
JOHNSON,in 5 inn,1-5-0 and in 9 inn,0-6
PLAY BANKS * (esp in 5 innings )
COOK - 180 need to parlay him or RL him
LATER
just ret from casino
they pulled MARLINS game off board due to a SP change ?????????????????? totally pizzed me off
Put a couple parlays together one with LITSCH and the other with GARLAND ,small loss investment if all others come thru,also took PIRATES and DUKE as that game slipped thru my plays as he's been pitching very well of late so hes on my card
lets win some money today
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
just ret from casino
they pulled MARLINS game off board due to a SP change ?????????????????? totally pizzed me off
Put a couple parlays together one with LITSCH and the other with GARLAND ,small loss investment if all others come thru,also took PIRATES and DUKE as that game slipped thru my plays as he's been pitching very well of late so hes on my card
lets win some money today
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
uuuuuugggh!
if it werent for the 4 errors, halos were in it last nite...||an_brick.gif' border=0>
a little bird told me sd is the play, also on stl & laa...||sleep2.gif' border=0>
BOL bob...||clover.gif' border=0>
0
uuuuuugggh!
if it werent for the 4 errors, halos were in it last nite...||an_brick.gif' border=0>
a little bird told me sd is the play, also on stl & laa...||sleep2.gif' border=0>
BOL bob...||clover.gif' border=0>
HI JORDY
yeaaa what a shame for Lackey to lose that start as he's way too good to have that loss around his NECK,esp with a 5 and final 7
ALL OVER GARLAND and LAA today did hedge with LITSCH but appears that was not NECESSARY
np for SD / DB's as both too UGLY
Can't believe CUBBIES IMPLODED and DUKE
||an_brick.gif' border=0>
Damnn need this rain delay win by PHILS with
2 on and HOWARD due up if ever RESTARTS
||confused.gif' border=0>
LOVE LAA tomorrow with SANTANA and MENDOZA stinks with,26 RA in 20 INNINGS + and 4 loses naturally in a row
0
HI JORDY
yeaaa what a shame for Lackey to lose that start as he's way too good to have that loss around his NECK,esp with a 5 and final 7
ALL OVER GARLAND and LAA today did hedge with LITSCH but appears that was not NECESSARY
np for SD / DB's as both too UGLY
Can't believe CUBBIES IMPLODED and DUKE
||an_brick.gif' border=0>
Damnn need this rain delay win by PHILS with
2 on and HOWARD due up if ever RESTARTS
||confused.gif' border=0>
LOVE LAA tomorrow with SANTANA and MENDOZA stinks with,26 RA in 20 INNINGS + and 4 loses naturally in a row
Can't believe CUBBIES IMPLODED and DUKE
Damnn i didn't think DUKE played for CUBBIES
||an_roll_laugh.gif' border=0>
Sorry guys meant PIRATES
there removing the TARPS start 7:10 pm
||an_dance.gif' border=0>
damnn need this win
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
0
Can't believe CUBBIES IMPLODED and DUKE
Damnn i didn't think DUKE played for CUBBIES
||an_roll_laugh.gif' border=0>
Sorry guys meant PIRATES
there removing the TARPS start 7:10 pm
||an_dance.gif' border=0>
damnn need this win
||Peace_5.gif' border=0>
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.