Betting a road team coming off at least one loss facing a home team coming off at least four straight wins.
Braves ML -135
2. Blue Jays at Red Sox
A. Red Sox last 2 games: WW Scored 7,7 Red Sox at home
B. Fade the walk-off winner
Blue Jays ML +102
3. Rockies at Astros
A. Betting a road team coming off at least one loss facing a home team coming off at least four straight wins.
B. Teams below .500, game after sweeping a series (Astros swept Orioles):
ML: 14-9 (60.9%)
RL -1.5: 8-14 (36.4%)
Rockies RL +1.5 (+110)
4. Rangers at Brewers
Brewers last 2 games:
WW Scored 6,6 Brewers at home
Rangers ML -105
5. Nationals at Padres
Fade the walk-off winner
Nationals ML -122
6. Cubs at Giants
A. Fading a team whose losing streak of length 4+ was just snapped in their previous game. Bet only if that team is at home (so you are betting the road team), and it is playing the same team once again.
B. Fading the walk-off winner
Cubs ML +105
Instead of a 6-pack of Blatz, I’m giving you a 6-pack of picks. You can thank me later.
Betting a road team coming off at least one loss facing a home team coming off at least four straight wins.
Braves ML -135
2. Blue Jays at Red Sox
A. Red Sox last 2 games: WW Scored 7,7 Red Sox at home
B. Fade the walk-off winner
Blue Jays ML +102
3. Rockies at Astros
A. Betting a road team coming off at least one loss facing a home team coming off at least four straight wins.
B. Teams below .500, game after sweeping a series (Astros swept Orioles):
ML: 14-9 (60.9%)
RL -1.5: 8-14 (36.4%)
Rockies RL +1.5 (+110)
4. Rangers at Brewers
Brewers last 2 games:
WW Scored 6,6 Brewers at home
Rangers ML -105
5. Nationals at Padres
Fade the walk-off winner
Nationals ML -122
6. Cubs at Giants
A. Fading a team whose losing streak of length 4+ was just snapped in their previous game. Bet only if that team is at home (so you are betting the road team), and it is playing the same team once again.
B. Fading the walk-off winner
Cubs ML +105
Instead of a 6-pack of Blatz, I’m giving you a 6-pack of picks. You can thank me later.
I like that pick a lot. Some thought that yesterday was a bad spot for the Brewers, but it was actually a bad spot for the Rangers. That's why the bookies were so generously offering the Rangers at +150 or better. So of course the Brewers overcame a phony 2-0 deficit and won easily.
But that brings up what’s become a bad spot for the Brewers. This is their 12th home series. They began 7 of the first 11 with a win but lost the next day 5 times, and each time by more than one run. The two times they managed to follow up a home series opening win with another win came first against the Cardinals on May 10th. At the time, the Cards were right in the middle of a 7-game losing streak in which they were outscored 45-20.
The second time the Brewers managed to win the first two games of a home series came on June 1st against the lowly White Sox who were in the midst of a 14-game losing streak. The Brewers had to come from behind that day to barely edge the White Sox in 10 innings.
I like that pick a lot. Some thought that yesterday was a bad spot for the Brewers, but it was actually a bad spot for the Rangers. That's why the bookies were so generously offering the Rangers at +150 or better. So of course the Brewers overcame a phony 2-0 deficit and won easily.
But that brings up what’s become a bad spot for the Brewers. This is their 12th home series. They began 7 of the first 11 with a win but lost the next day 5 times, and each time by more than one run. The two times they managed to follow up a home series opening win with another win came first against the Cardinals on May 10th. At the time, the Cards were right in the middle of a 7-game losing streak in which they were outscored 45-20.
The second time the Brewers managed to win the first two games of a home series came on June 1st against the lowly White Sox who were in the midst of a 14-game losing streak. The Brewers had to come from behind that day to barely edge the White Sox in 10 innings.
The Texas Rangers effing suck. Those disinterested losers never had more than one runner on base the entire game. They never put up a fight. Down a run in the bottom of the 6th, they escaped a bases loaded jam. You'd figure they'd be inspired to get something going in the top of the 7th, right? No, not them. They quickly went 1-2-3 for the fourth time. This team couldn't GAF about defending its World Series title.
The Texas Rangers effing suck. Those disinterested losers never had more than one runner on base the entire game. They never put up a fight. Down a run in the bottom of the 6th, they escaped a bases loaded jam. You'd figure they'd be inspired to get something going in the top of the 7th, right? No, not them. They quickly went 1-2-3 for the fourth time. This team couldn't GAF about defending its World Series title.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.