The last time the Cubs played a Game 6, they played an adventurous
one against the Tigers, blowing a four-run lead in the eighth inning.
Starting pitcher Hank Borowy came in for the ninth and pitched four
scoreless innings, with the Cubs winning on Stan Hack’s hit in the
bottom of the 12th. Won 8-7
The Cubs will play Game 6 on Tuesday night, ending the longest wait between World Series Game 6 appearances.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The last time the Cubs played a Game 6, they played an adventurous
one against the Tigers, blowing a four-run lead in the eighth inning.
Starting pitcher Hank Borowy came in for the ninth and pitched four
scoreless innings, with the Cubs winning on Stan Hack’s hit in the
bottom of the 12th. Won 8-7
The Cubs will play Game 6 on Tuesday night, ending the longest wait between World Series Game 6 appearances.
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Leading 3-games-2:
Ignoring win order; ignoring site order: The team leading 3-games-2 irrespective of site order (Cleveland) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2016 MLB Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 606-156 (.795)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 109-36 (.752)
series record, MLB only, all rounds: 70-29 (.707)
series record, MLB only, Finals round: 42-19 (.689)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 418-344 (.549)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 73-72 (.503)
Game 6 record, MLB only, all rounds: 47-52 (.475)
Game 6 record, MLB only, Finals round: 24-37 (.393)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1318 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and
MLB series played through the 2016 MLB Semifinals. Note in general that
the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular
situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning
fraction:
For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning
fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is
400-100 rather than 4-1.
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Leading 3-games-2 @ HHVVV:
Ignoring win order; considering site order: The team leading 3-games-2 with site order HHVVV (Cleveland) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2016 MLB Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 46-10 (.821)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 29-6 (.829)
series record, MLB only, all rounds: 34-10 (.773)
series record, MLB only, Finals round: 17-6 (.739)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 35-21 (.625)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 22-13 (.629)
Game 6 record, MLB only, all rounds: 25-19 (.568)
Game 6 record, MLB only, Finals round: 12-11 (.522)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1318 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and
MLB series played through the 2016 MLB Semifinals. Note in general that
the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular
situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning
fraction:
For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning
fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is
400-100 rather than 4-1.
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Leading WLWWL:
Considering win order; ignoring site order: The team leading WLWWL irrespective of site order (Cleveland) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2016 MLB Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 60-22 (.732)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 10-3 (.769)
series record, MLB only, all rounds: 6-5 (.545)
series record, MLB only, Finals round: 5-3 (.625)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 45-37 (.549)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 7-6 (.538)
Game 6 record, MLB only, all rounds: 4-7 (.364)
Game 6 record, MLB only, Finals round: 3-5 (.375)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1318 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and
MLB series played through the 2016 MLB Semifinals. Note in general that
the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular
situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning
fraction:
For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning
fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is
400-100 rather than 4-1.
0
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Leading 3-games-2:
Ignoring win order; ignoring site order: The team leading 3-games-2 irrespective of site order (Cleveland) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2016 MLB Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 606-156 (.795)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 109-36 (.752)
series record, MLB only, all rounds: 70-29 (.707)
series record, MLB only, Finals round: 42-19 (.689)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 418-344 (.549)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 73-72 (.503)
Game 6 record, MLB only, all rounds: 47-52 (.475)
Game 6 record, MLB only, Finals round: 24-37 (.393)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1318 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and
MLB series played through the 2016 MLB Semifinals. Note in general that
the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular
situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning
fraction:
For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning
fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is
400-100 rather than 4-1.
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Leading 3-games-2 @ HHVVV:
Ignoring win order; considering site order: The team leading 3-games-2 with site order HHVVV (Cleveland) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2016 MLB Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 46-10 (.821)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 29-6 (.829)
series record, MLB only, all rounds: 34-10 (.773)
series record, MLB only, Finals round: 17-6 (.739)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 35-21 (.625)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 22-13 (.629)
Game 6 record, MLB only, all rounds: 25-19 (.568)
Game 6 record, MLB only, Finals round: 12-11 (.522)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1318 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and
MLB series played through the 2016 MLB Semifinals. Note in general that
the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular
situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning
fraction:
For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning
fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is
400-100 rather than 4-1.
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Leading WLWWL:
Considering win order; ignoring site order: The team leading WLWWL irrespective of site order (Cleveland) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2016 MLB Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 60-22 (.732)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 10-3 (.769)
series record, MLB only, all rounds: 6-5 (.545)
series record, MLB only, Finals round: 5-3 (.625)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 45-37 (.549)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 7-6 (.538)
Game 6 record, MLB only, all rounds: 4-7 (.364)
Game 6 record, MLB only, Finals round: 3-5 (.375)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1318 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and
MLB series played through the 2016 MLB Semifinals. Note in general that
the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular
situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning
fraction:
For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning
fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is
400-100 rather than 4-1.
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Leading WLWWL @ HHVVV:
Considering win order; considering site order: The team leading WLWWL with site order HHVVV (Cleveland) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2016 MLB Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 2-2 (.500)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 2-2 (.500)
series record, MLB only, all rounds: 2-2 (.500)
series record, MLB only, Finals round: 2-2 (.500)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 2-2 (.500)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 2-2 (.500)
Game 6 record, MLB only, all rounds: 2-2 (.500)
Game 6 record, MLB only, Finals round: 2-2 (.500)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1318 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and
MLB series played through the 2016 MLB Semifinals. Note in general that
the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular
situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning
fraction:
For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning
fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is
400-100 rather than 4-1.
SERIES NOTES:
After Game 5: The Chicago Cubs hosted and bested the Cleveland
Indians 3-runs-2 to reduce the Cleveland Indians best-of-7 MLB/NBA/NHL
series 1319 lead to 3-games-2. When leading a best-of-7 MLB/NBA/NHL
playoff series 3-games-2, the Cleveland Indians have a series record of
3-1 and a Game 6 record of 3-1. When trailing a best-of-7 MLB/NBA/NHL
playoff series 3-games-2, the Chicago Cubs have a series record of 0-4
and a Game 6 record of 1-3. When leading a best-of-7 MLB playoff series
3-games-2, the Cleveland Indians have a 3-1 series record and a 3-1 Game
6 record; the sole Game 6 and series loss occurred in the Indians' last
such series, against the Boston Red Sox in series 1020, the 2007
American League Championship Series. When trailing a best-of-7 MLB
playoff series 3-games-2, the Chicago Cubs' sole Game 6 victory occurred
in the last series in which they trailed 3-games-2 (i.e., series 55, in
the 1945 MLB Finals).
Whowins
0
HISTORICAL VICTORY PROBABILITIES: Leading WLWWL @ HHVVV:
Considering win order; considering site order: The team leading WLWWL with site order HHVVV (Cleveland) has the following best-of-7 playoff series and games record through the 2016 MLB Semifinals:
series record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 2-2 (.500)
series record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 2-2 (.500)
series record, MLB only, all rounds: 2-2 (.500)
series record, MLB only, Finals round: 2-2 (.500)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, all rounds: 2-2 (.500)
Game 6 record, all best-of-7 sports, Finals round: 2-2 (.500)
Game 6 record, MLB only, all rounds: 2-2 (.500)
Game 6 record, MLB only, Finals round: 2-2 (.500)
These records are drawn from the applicable 1318 best-of-7 NHL, NBA, and
MLB series played through the 2016 MLB Semifinals. Note in general that
the greater the number of games or series fitting a particular
situation, the greater the significance of the corresponding winning
fraction:
For example, 0.800 is far more likely to come closer to the true winning
fraction in a given situation when the corresponding win-loss record is
400-100 rather than 4-1.
SERIES NOTES:
After Game 5: The Chicago Cubs hosted and bested the Cleveland
Indians 3-runs-2 to reduce the Cleveland Indians best-of-7 MLB/NBA/NHL
series 1319 lead to 3-games-2. When leading a best-of-7 MLB/NBA/NHL
playoff series 3-games-2, the Cleveland Indians have a series record of
3-1 and a Game 6 record of 3-1. When trailing a best-of-7 MLB/NBA/NHL
playoff series 3-games-2, the Chicago Cubs have a series record of 0-4
and a Game 6 record of 1-3. When leading a best-of-7 MLB playoff series
3-games-2, the Cleveland Indians have a 3-1 series record and a 3-1 Game
6 record; the sole Game 6 and series loss occurred in the Indians' last
such series, against the Boston Red Sox in series 1020, the 2007
American League Championship Series. When trailing a best-of-7 MLB
playoff series 3-games-2, the Chicago Cubs' sole Game 6 victory occurred
in the last series in which they trailed 3-games-2 (i.e., series 55, in
the 1945 MLB Finals).
Chicago Cubs were able to stave off elimination Sunday with a 3-2
victory in Game 5 at Wrigley Field and now face another
Win-or-Be-Eliminated game as the series shifts back to Cleveland.
Current odds at Bovada.lv has Cubs -$1.43 road favorites with the total
set at 7 runs across all shops.
Cubs 50-37 in an opposing park platting 5.21 runs/game should feel
pretty confident sending Jake Arrieta to the mound. The right-hander has
pitched better on the road (12-4, 12-6 TSR) than at home (7-5, 9-7 TSR)
this season and enters off a solid 5 2/3 innings of 1 run ball in a win
at Progressive Field in Game 2. Cleveland flourishing in front of the
home audience this season (59-29) crossing 5.5 per/contest counter with
Josh Tomlin. The right-hander blanking Cubbies on two hits in Tribe's
Game 3 victory has allowed 2 or fewer runs in each of his three post
season starts this season.
Some telling gems among a sea of baseball betting stats leap out
favoring Cleveland clinching their first World Series Championship since
1948. The one run Game 5 loss bodes well for Cleveland's chances, since
Indians are on a perfect 8-0 streak off a one run exact loss.
Additionally, Indians have a sparkling 9-0 streak in their first game
home off a road swing. One final betting nugget. 'Under' gambler's
who've cleaned up with Cleveland this post season (2-11 O/U) won't jump
ship knowing Indians are 0-8-1 O/U in Tomlin's last nine starts.
0
Chicago Cubs were able to stave off elimination Sunday with a 3-2
victory in Game 5 at Wrigley Field and now face another
Win-or-Be-Eliminated game as the series shifts back to Cleveland.
Current odds at Bovada.lv has Cubs -$1.43 road favorites with the total
set at 7 runs across all shops.
Cubs 50-37 in an opposing park platting 5.21 runs/game should feel
pretty confident sending Jake Arrieta to the mound. The right-hander has
pitched better on the road (12-4, 12-6 TSR) than at home (7-5, 9-7 TSR)
this season and enters off a solid 5 2/3 innings of 1 run ball in a win
at Progressive Field in Game 2. Cleveland flourishing in front of the
home audience this season (59-29) crossing 5.5 per/contest counter with
Josh Tomlin. The right-hander blanking Cubbies on two hits in Tribe's
Game 3 victory has allowed 2 or fewer runs in each of his three post
season starts this season.
Some telling gems among a sea of baseball betting stats leap out
favoring Cleveland clinching their first World Series Championship since
1948. The one run Game 5 loss bodes well for Cleveland's chances, since
Indians are on a perfect 8-0 streak off a one run exact loss.
Additionally, Indians have a sparkling 9-0 streak in their first game
home off a road swing. One final betting nugget. 'Under' gambler's
who've cleaned up with Cleveland this post season (2-11 O/U) won't jump
ship knowing Indians are 0-8-1 O/U in Tomlin's last nine starts.
CHI CUBS vs. CLEVELAND
The total has gone UNDER in 4 of Chi Cubs's last 6 games when playing on the road against Cleveland
The total has gone UNDER in 6 of Chi Cubs's last 7 games when playing Cleveland
The total has gone UNDER in 5 of Cleveland's last 5 games at home
Cleveland is 5-1 SU in its last 6 games at home
0
CHI CUBS vs. CLEVELAND
The total has gone UNDER in 4 of Chi Cubs's last 6 games when playing on the road against Cleveland
The total has gone UNDER in 6 of Chi Cubs's last 7 games when playing Cleveland
The total has gone UNDER in 5 of Cleveland's last 5 games at home
Cleveland is 5-1 SU in its last 6 games at home
Home dogs off a road dog loss at +200 or more are 0-7 if they scored 2
or less runs and take on a team off a home win.. Game 6 home teams in
this exact sequence all time are just 2-2.
By R.Vinciletti
0
Home dogs off a road dog loss at +200 or more are 0-7 if they scored 2
or less runs and take on a team off a home win.. Game 6 home teams in
this exact sequence all time are just 2-2.
Chicago at Cleveland
Arrieta: CHICAGO CUBS 6-9 SU on the road when the total is 7 or less
Tomlin: CLEVELAND INDIANS 14-3 SU when playing with a day off
StatFox Super Situations
CHICAGO CUBS at CLEVELAND
Play Against - Road teams (CHICAGO CUBS) good offensive team - scoring
>=4.8 runs/game on the season (NL), after allowing 2 runs or less
117-86 over the last 5 seasons. ( 57.6% | 29.8 units ) 44-49 this year. (
47.3% | -5.3 units )
StatFox Situational Power Trends
CHICAGO CUBS at CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND is 86-44 (+32.3 Units) against the money line when the total
is 7 to 8.5 this season. The average score was: CLEVELAND (4.9) ,
OPPONENT (3.7)
0
Chicago at Cleveland
Arrieta: CHICAGO CUBS 6-9 SU on the road when the total is 7 or less
Tomlin: CLEVELAND INDIANS 14-3 SU when playing with a day off
StatFox Super Situations
CHICAGO CUBS at CLEVELAND
Play Against - Road teams (CHICAGO CUBS) good offensive team - scoring
>=4.8 runs/game on the season (NL), after allowing 2 runs or less
117-86 over the last 5 seasons. ( 57.6% | 29.8 units ) 44-49 this year. (
47.3% | -5.3 units )
StatFox Situational Power Trends
CHICAGO CUBS at CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND is 86-44 (+32.3 Units) against the money line when the total
is 7 to 8.5 this season. The average score was: CLEVELAND (4.9) ,
OPPONENT (3.7)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.