The Mystics have only allowed 2 players to eclipse this number, and both times the opposing teams had to score 98 (Storm, Skylar Diggins-Smith 9 AST) and 101 (Aces, Jackie Young 10 AST) to do it. The highest the Fever have scored is 88 points. I don't see how Caitlin gets there.
Pick: Caitlin Clark Under 8.5 assists
The Mystics have only allowed 2 players to eclipse this number, and both times the opposing teams had to score 98 (Storm, Skylar Diggins-Smith 9 AST) and 101 (Aces, Jackie Young 10 AST) to do it. The highest the Fever have scored is 88 points. I don't see how Caitlin gets there.
Pick: Caitlin Clark Under 8.5 assists
@Ricodamus
Not saying it was a bad pick or that anything shady happened but after reading the story on the difference between Michael Jordan's stats on assists, steals, and rebounds at home (with a Chicago provided scorer) vs. what he got in visiting games the same year was way out of line I'm always cautious (forget the year but it was when he was mad he wasn't being recognized for his defensive work and got named defensive player of the year, I think). The variance between them were way more than what you saw with other players.
Anyway the point is I will never bet an under on a player's stats at home in basketball except for points where there is no wiggle room. The guy who wrote the article claimed he went back to a number of the games that he could find on the internet (full replays) and tried to match up the scorer's number with what he saw and he couldn't do it . He said that on assists he believed that the only way he could get there was if Jordan passed the ball to a teammate and after three dribbles to reposition himself past the defender the guy scored. Not really fixing a game but if you bet props you might think different.
Appreciate your handicapping as always
@Ricodamus
Not saying it was a bad pick or that anything shady happened but after reading the story on the difference between Michael Jordan's stats on assists, steals, and rebounds at home (with a Chicago provided scorer) vs. what he got in visiting games the same year was way out of line I'm always cautious (forget the year but it was when he was mad he wasn't being recognized for his defensive work and got named defensive player of the year, I think). The variance between them were way more than what you saw with other players.
Anyway the point is I will never bet an under on a player's stats at home in basketball except for points where there is no wiggle room. The guy who wrote the article claimed he went back to a number of the games that he could find on the internet (full replays) and tried to match up the scorer's number with what he saw and he couldn't do it . He said that on assists he believed that the only way he could get there was if Jordan passed the ball to a teammate and after three dribbles to reposition himself past the defender the guy scored. Not really fixing a game but if you bet props you might think different.
Appreciate your handicapping as always
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
