Come on man.. With your many years of betting experience, you should know that things don't always go as planned.. 
Hopefully that experience also fine tuned your discipline so you only bet your standard amount on this which resulted in the loss being negligible. Just another "bump" in the journey of sports betting...
Its not that simple You look at the refs because if they lean over it makes it easy. You look at the situation because that can be a lock. There are games that are very close to unbeatable in both directions. The Houston game tomorrow is it under or over? If you want to believe that game would have gone under if Luka had been playing normally that is just silly. The team follows him and that would have been that. Detroit and Hornets. 1 over or both. The Kings have drifted into a under direction that should be looked at every game. I repeat is the Houston game over or under?
lol. here’s the deal. the pace was 106.5 because the mavs had to play catch-up. their offensive rating at the end of the game was 93. in order to reach 227, their rating needed to be about 13.5 points higher. and if that was the case, the pace would be lower. which means they would need an even higher rating. you need to do math to bet totals or you’re just guessing.
This was just a standard bet that would have cashed if Luka had been Luka. Its just listening to people talk about that under as if it were something to be cherished.
Said Kawhi Leonard after the game, "Wanted to do the best job we could on Luka. He's been killing it lately, playing at a very, very high level. We just wanted to make it difficult for him tonight, get some deflections and I think we were able to do that."
That's why Luka wasn't Luka. Those Clipper bad boys were out to shut him down!
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
