D WILLIAMS OFFENSIVE FOUL???? JAZZ WOULD OF COVERED

Question

DAMNNNNN oddsmakers right on....congrats Laker backers but if they go the other way On D williams at the end there the Jazz cover.....thats fuckin nuts

hammer22 · Answer

DAMNNNNN oddsmakers right on....congrats Laker backers but if they go the other way On D williams at the end there the Jazz cover.....thats fuckin nuts

Iw1nBets · Answer

well hate to ruin your idea but umm they woulda fouled if only down by 5 .....&#xD;&#xA;I know what I just said sounds crazy since it involved cognition to be able to think more then one step ahead

KentuckyA-Lew · Answer

Jazz would&#x27;ve fouled the lakers on the next play had this not been called a charge.  Even though if you watch it, it clearly is a charge.

getoheisman · Answer

That was a wack call. No call if any but again it doesnt suprise me these refs been doin it all year.

hammer22 · Answer

whatever everyone knows this shits fixed....im not sweatin it

tjohnsont · Answer

Gambling in general is fixed. Its called odds- you gonna lose. Blackjack is fixed- the odds are against you. Gambling is made for you to lose. But don't you still love it.

You can't cry fix when you lose and then call yourself the best capper when you win.

The_Swamp · Answer

Just gotta lay off NBA...  When you&#x27;re on the right side/with the zebras it&#x27;s great, when your on the other side however, it blows because the calls are blatant!  That And 1 on MILLSAP come on...Lakers went over the back quite a few times in that 4th Q, anyone who plays ball knows that..Be smart, take your money and run!

ratherBgambling · Answer

obvious charge

hammer22 · Answer

agreed

dustyent · Answer

i was on the jazz and that was a charge...i think that the lakers benefited from the calls tonite though.

JCtS · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by tjohnsont] &#xD;&#xA;Gambling in general is fixed.  Its called odds- you gonna lose.  Blackjack is fixed- the odds are against you.  Gambling is made for you to lose.  But don&#x27;t you still love it.&#xD;&#xA;You can&#x27;t cry fix when you lose and then call yourself the best capper when you win.&#xD;&#xA;[/Quote]

JumboDaddy · Answer

Clearly a charge, and I was on the Jazz. I would've loved the no-call, but I can't disagree with the call on the floor. And as others have been saying, Utah fouls down 5 and is down by 7 after LA makes their free throws.

jwheels86 · Answer

Then lakers give a wide open uncontested 3 to win by 4 or 5

JBrilman · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by Iw1nBets]  well hate to ruin your idea but umm they woulda fouled if only down by 5 .....&#xD;&#xA;I know what I just said sounds crazy since it involved cognition to be able to think more then one step ahead  [/Quote]

BigEastExpert · Answer

It was a charge - no doubt.  And yes the Jazz would have fouled right away to give up 2 FTs and likely lose the cover anyway.

hammer22 · Answer

well I had Jazz &#x2B;7 so to make it a 5 maybe 4 point game right there Ill take it and stretch the game out hoping for a missed free throw or th Jazz score again.....oh well it doesnt matter anyways

D WILLIAMS OFFENSIVE FOUL???? JAZZ WOULD OF COVERED

Hot Forum Topics