All Forums | NBA Betting

Kim's POD (36-19-0) Tuesday

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2975
Posts: 22
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1740
Posted: #1
Great win with the Spurs. Now for tonight's game.

Play:

Pacers-3.5

It's about time the Pacers would win this one. Well, they are due for one. Against a sloppy Blazers team on the road this is kinnda easy don't you think guys? Pacers are probably a public play tonight. About time you people stop backing Portland guys coz they suck as in literally suck. This is typically one of the teams that have a good start and bad finish this season.

GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 84
Posted: #2


good call on SAS last night!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1740
Posted: #3
Thanks buddy, also adding up the Nuggets-5.5 as a POD
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 79
Posted: #4
portland will loss tonight then make a trade after that loss
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1132
Posted: #5
not to fast on the pacers here. situational factor could be on blazers advantage..take a second look bud
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 3170
Posted: #6
why is it a situational play for por instead?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 84
Posted: #7
what do you mean gomburzago?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1740
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by gomburzago:

not to fast on the pacers here. situational factor could be on blazers advantage..take a second look bud
It doesn't matter, Pacers are still the better team especially at home.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 3170
Posted: #9
i really think pacers with some home cooking here. por got their break already last game @ washington. plus indy due for a win.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 5612
Posted: #10
Blazers play shit on road while Pacers are hot at home
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1132
Posted: #11
public is all over indiana - this alone sholud be a concern
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 619
Posted: #12

Quote Originally Posted by gomburzago:

public is all over indiana - this alone sholud be a concern

So you are saying if a person has capped this game, and everything points to INDI, because the public is on it, bet against it. WOW, the public isnt always wrong, maybe this is a time that they are correct. Did you look at it from that angle, comments like this are funny, there is more to capping games than just betting against the public.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1740
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by Blacks2011:

So you are saying if a person has capped this game, and everything points to INDI, because the public is on it, bet against it. WOW, the public isnt always wrong, maybe this is a time that they are correct. Did you look at it from that angle, comments like this are funny, there is more to capping games than just betting against the public.

Exactly my friend. That's where most people are wrong, they think that just because a team is a public bet that they would lose. However, public bets doesn't mean that the public has the most money on it. AND online websites showing money lines and game lines aren't real guys, only VEGAS knows what they really are.

Just an example folks. Let's say 90% of public is on Indiana and only 10% is on Portland. Does it automatically mean that the money line of the public exceeds the money line of the non public? NO. Let's say the 90% public just bet a total of 200 million dollars and let's say the 10% out there (comprising of the big names like Mayweather and the rest) bet a total of 500 million dollars? Who's the public now? Now this is just an example.

My friends, learn to think outside the box. No wonder no one believes me when I say I've won over a total of $30000 over the past 3 years by betting just around less than $100 a day (for a total of all team bets, no parlays). It is just then when they see what I have that they believe. I'm sorry for those big bettors but I'm just under 21 years old so don't expect me to bet like you guys do.

Let's just see the outcome of the games tomorrow. Who knows? I might be wrong, I'm human after all. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 84
Posted: #14
good logic on the betting! well said brother!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 340
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by Blacks2011:

So you are saying if a person has capped this game, and everything points to INDI, because the public is on it, bet against it. WOW, the public isnt always wrong, maybe this is a time that they are correct. Did you look at it from that angle, comments like this are funny, there is more to capping games than just betting against the public.



Given the fact that PORTLAND JUST  a couple of days ago lost HUGE in a seemingly trap game to boston  ( +3) at boston.... highly unlikely that they are giving away 2 freebees with the same team in such a short span

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 340
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by kimmipwete123:

Exactly my friend. That's where most people are wrong, they think that just because a team is a public bet that they would lose. However, public bets doesn't mean that the public has the most money on it. AND online websites showing money lines and game lines aren't real guys, only VEGAS knows what they really are.

Just an example folks. Let's say 90% of public is on Indiana and only 10% is on Portland. Does it automatically mean that the money line of the public exceeds the money line of the non public? NO. Let's say the 90% public just bet a total of 200 million dollars and let's say the 10% out there (comprising of the big names like Mayweather and the rest) bet a total of 500 million dollars? Who's the public now? Now this is just an example.

My friends, learn to think outside the box. No wonder no one believes me when I say I've won over a total of $30000 over the past 3 years by betting just around less than $100 a day (for a total of all team bets, no parlays). It is just then when they see what I have that they believe. I'm sorry for those big bettors but I'm just under 21 years old so don't expect me to bet like you guys do.

Let's just see the outcome of the games tomorrow. Who knows? I might be wrong, I'm human after all. 


I hear you on not just being scared because public is on a play i AGREE but in THIS situation ( bare with me for comfusing explanation)  ...  a team recently off a  +3 massacre in a seemingly trap game...now vs. another team 3 days later in the SAME situation.... winning one game fine but 2 within a week with the same team ??
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 340
Posted: #17
ALso man you CANT win $30,000 in 3 years betting less or equal to $100 a day ...Try again   365 days a year  hitting 60 percent you make roughly $5,830 a year
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 619
Posted: #18

Quote Originally Posted by Marmix22:



Given the fact that PORTLAND JUST  a couple of days ago lost HUGE in a seemingly trap game to boston  ( +3) at boston.... highly unlikely that they are giving away 2 freebees with the same team in such a short span

TRAP GAME, FREEBIES, all word that I laugh at. Vegas doesnt give any freebies, do you guys even know/or even understand how these lines are created. Everyone has their theory on these games, but alot of you so called cappers just talk off the top of your head.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 619
Posted: #19

Quote Originally Posted by Marmix22:

ALso man you CANT win $30,000 in 3 years betting less or equal to $100 a day ...Try again   365 days a year  hitting 60 percent you make roughly $5,830 a year

Who said he/she is just betting on basketball, you do know that their are other sports to bet on within those 365 days.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 224
Posted: #20
With you on the Pacers! Really like how they play at home
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1740
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by Marmix22:

ALso man you CANT win $30,000 in 3 years betting less or equal to $100 a day ...Try again   365 days a year  hitting 60 percent you make roughly $5,830 a year
I actually can man. It doesn't mean that I'm roughly about 65% now that those are the only team bets I make? Ever wonder how many teams I played yesterday even though I just posted Spurs as my best play? AND btw there is also another local sports betting in my country which is easier to win. Like you'd easily find out if this team was gonna sell out which game and that my friend is called the Philippine Basketball Association.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 1740
Posted: #22
And you did the math wrong buddy. Let's say 365 days of NBA betting which is unrealistic since NBA betting only lasts for 8 months starting October (with the exception to this season). Rounding it off, I'd say a total of 180 days since sometimes I take vacations to other countries so I don't have a bookie and since I'm under 21 I can't register online betting. And let's say I hit just 60% (which I don't). 180 days x 60% = 108 days of winning x $100 a day = This gives me a total of $10,800 for the whole season. Not yet counting other bets such as parlays that might have won and PBA betting.
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.