Been thinking long and hard about this game and the plays I've decided on are:
Mavs +7 for 6 units
Celtics ML for 8 units to win 3 units
Essentially this is risking about 3 units to win 9 units for the Celtics to win by 1-6. A Celtics win by exactly 7 still nets a profit of 3 units.
Reasoning here is that despite the Celtics massively outplaying the Mavs in G1, the Celtics won the game by 18. The line for G1 was 6.5 so despite everything that went right for the Celtics and everything that went wrong for the Mavs, the Celtics still only covered the spread by 12.
I think that the Mavs will make adjustments and also Kyrie should have a much better game. Kyrie went 6-19 and 0-5 from 3. This is very much an outlier for him and I think he will step it up in G2. I also think we may see some negative regression from the Celtics who shot 38% from 3 when normally they average 36% from 3. For example, Porzingis hitting those deep 3's don't count on that happening again.
Given all of those factors, I think the Mavs will play better and keep this game closer. I don't think they will do enough to win the game as they lack the offensive firepower to keep up with the Celtics. That said, 3 units to win 9 units is an enticing risk/reward for me to play this game in this way.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Been thinking long and hard about this game and the plays I've decided on are:
Mavs +7 for 6 units
Celtics ML for 8 units to win 3 units
Essentially this is risking about 3 units to win 9 units for the Celtics to win by 1-6. A Celtics win by exactly 7 still nets a profit of 3 units.
Reasoning here is that despite the Celtics massively outplaying the Mavs in G1, the Celtics won the game by 18. The line for G1 was 6.5 so despite everything that went right for the Celtics and everything that went wrong for the Mavs, the Celtics still only covered the spread by 12.
I think that the Mavs will make adjustments and also Kyrie should have a much better game. Kyrie went 6-19 and 0-5 from 3. This is very much an outlier for him and I think he will step it up in G2. I also think we may see some negative regression from the Celtics who shot 38% from 3 when normally they average 36% from 3. For example, Porzingis hitting those deep 3's don't count on that happening again.
Given all of those factors, I think the Mavs will play better and keep this game closer. I don't think they will do enough to win the game as they lack the offensive firepower to keep up with the Celtics. That said, 3 units to win 9 units is an enticing risk/reward for me to play this game in this way.
Exactly. Why go all through this trying to bet 2 things to happen for you to win. Just bet on DAL +7. Make it simple. Too many scenarios to be honest. Complicated.
1
@hotflaznboi
Exactly. Why go all through this trying to bet 2 things to happen for you to win. Just bet on DAL +7. Make it simple. Too many scenarios to be honest. Complicated.
If Tim Hardaway does NOT step on the court then Dallas surely has a shot of at least covering , maybe getting the W outright. Tim Hardaway should not be allowed to step on a basketball court in any important game ever.
0
If Tim Hardaway does NOT step on the court then Dallas surely has a shot of at least covering , maybe getting the W outright. Tim Hardaway should not be allowed to step on a basketball court in any important game ever.
So for background, I have been doing very well these playoffs and am up big. So part of why I am doing this play is to protect my profits a bit.
Seeing this as a lower risk, higher reward play since it’s paying 3:1.
Everyone’s situation is different so I totally get why ppl may not want to play it this way. I was going to not play G2 actually cause I am a low volume bettor where I wait for spots I really like. After giving this game a lot of thought I think C’s win but Mavs cover so willing to put a small bet on it. 3 units is smaller than I normally do.
0
So for background, I have been doing very well these playoffs and am up big. So part of why I am doing this play is to protect my profits a bit.
Seeing this as a lower risk, higher reward play since it’s paying 3:1.
Everyone’s situation is different so I totally get why ppl may not want to play it this way. I was going to not play G2 actually cause I am a low volume bettor where I wait for spots I really like. After giving this game a lot of thought I think C’s win but Mavs cover so willing to put a small bet on it. 3 units is smaller than I normally do.
I actually had thought about buying the 1/2 to get Mavs +7.5 but the risk/reward wasn't as enticing so I passed on that. Happy w/ the win regardless and yes would have sucked to lose by the 1/2.
0
I actually had thought about buying the 1/2 to get Mavs +7.5 but the risk/reward wasn't as enticing so I passed on that. Happy w/ the win regardless and yes would have sucked to lose by the 1/2.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.