@F82ghost money % mean actual money % for example looking at the total we see a 72% of bets on the over. that means public are betting on the over but sharp money is on the under at 79%
0
@F82ghost money % mean actual money % for example looking at the total we see a 72% of bets on the over. that means public are betting on the over but sharp money is on the under at 79%
This is the second thread like this the last two days. Pay no mind. The Champs it is! The Public wins and the public loses who cares. There’s plenty action on both sides and we don’t know where the biggest wagers are to be on the right side of a fix if there were to be a fix. Therefore this doesn’t even matter. Stop posting this crap.
“A Fool And His Money Are Soon Parted” -Thomas Tusser 1557
0
This is the second thread like this the last two days. Pay no mind. The Champs it is! The Public wins and the public loses who cares. There’s plenty action on both sides and we don’t know where the biggest wagers are to be on the right side of a fix if there were to be a fix. Therefore this doesn’t even matter. Stop posting this crap.
Correct me if Im wrong, just trying to understand- Public bets are 55% Nets but sharp spread is 63% Lakersright?
The way I interpret it as:
The percentage of the bets are on the Nets spread BUT there are bigger wagers on the Lakers spread.
For example to simplify:
55 bets of $10 are on the Nets spread where as there are 25 bets of $100 on the Lakers spread, thus the 63% of the spread money is on the Laker's spread and the Laker's spread carries more weight even though technically, there are more (smaller) wagers on the Nets spread.. 55 bets spread bets on the Nets vrs 25 bets on the Lakers spread..
Got it? Hopefully that turned on. But I agree with enzyme13and his quote of:
Quote Originally Posted by Enzyme13:
post the source
We need a credible source for this information but then again, does it really matter? This game has bettors evenly divided so the odds makers will get their 10% tonight. I just want the Nets to cover with my +2.5..
all..
"Schrödinger's bet." A bet that loses when you bet it but wins when you DON'T bet it...
1
Quote Originally Posted by Ruby664:
Correct me if Im wrong, just trying to understand- Public bets are 55% Nets but sharp spread is 63% Lakersright?
The way I interpret it as:
The percentage of the bets are on the Nets spread BUT there are bigger wagers on the Lakers spread.
For example to simplify:
55 bets of $10 are on the Nets spread where as there are 25 bets of $100 on the Lakers spread, thus the 63% of the spread money is on the Laker's spread and the Laker's spread carries more weight even though technically, there are more (smaller) wagers on the Nets spread.. 55 bets spread bets on the Nets vrs 25 bets on the Lakers spread..
Got it? Hopefully that turned on. But I agree with enzyme13and his quote of:
Quote Originally Posted by Enzyme13:
post the source
We need a credible source for this information but then again, does it really matter? This game has bettors evenly divided so the odds makers will get their 10% tonight. I just want the Nets to cover with my +2.5..
Bets% is the number of wagers (small, big, whatever).
Money% is the actual monetary split.
So you can have 80% of tickets on Lakers worth $200k, but if you have a whale betting on Nets worth $800k, you can have bets% of 20% and money% of 80% on Nets.
-- Take a leap of faith
0
Bets% is the number of wagers (small, big, whatever).
Money% is the actual monetary split.
So you can have 80% of tickets on Lakers worth $200k, but if you have a whale betting on Nets worth $800k, you can have bets% of 20% and money% of 80% on Nets.
This being said, I did not find any correlation to this phenomenon to actual accurate predictions by high money% discrepancies. These sharps make bad calls just like the public does, just at a lower frequency.
-- Take a leap of faith
0
This being said, I did not find any correlation to this phenomenon to actual accurate predictions by high money% discrepancies. These sharps make bad calls just like the public does, just at a lower frequency.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.