Pacers have 9 points in the 3rd quater after not even reaching 20 points in the 2nd quater vs bucks w/o key players

Siakam 2/7FGs 6 points (1/4 FTs) 2 REB 2 ASTs Unbelievable!

NBA Most rigged competition in the world lol

@Slimteo

 Siakam  avgs 25 pts ...he has 9 vs bucks w/o key players

+ Pacers scoring this low twice against a bucks team  w/o key players seems very unlikely. 

Something weird is going on.

Also Siakam been AGGRESSIVE all series , tonight only 8 shot attempts. he avgs 20.

I didn’t get to bet this game but a clear let down spot for them to close out the series in Indy next game!! 

@omgbetlax

 They were asked to lose so they'd get more money with Game 6 at home!

@Taipei-Tony

 Pacers didn;t even reach 20 points as a team in the 2nd or 3rd agisnt a bucks team w/o their key players. After scoring 31 in the 1st quarter. 

Do not even think to try to make money from NBA. Sure one of the worst. Took parlay but for fun. This is not sports but just things to gamble 100000%. This game is the case, even in Playoffs, they do not care. They do care money LOL

If you bet $10 on pacers under 20 for 2nd and 3rd quarter tonight you would have made $10k ($5k each)

That is how rare a NBA team not reaching 20 points as a team for the quarter is especially in a elimination game vs a team w/o it's two key players.

Very odd.  

I knew they gonna fixed it under when it's so obvious going over.  Coming out shooting lights out first 6 minutes 1q and I tossed my $ away.  I'm sure many live betters did the same... good job vegas

These post game retard convention threads never get boring,,,covers ChatGPT bots just keep evolving and maturing into the cutest little rigtarts,,,all these prospects trying to gain street cred are hilarious 

In other words, it was 30:1 for them to score less than 20 points for each quarter..... but you're making it sound like it's astronomically impossible.

It's not 5000 each, though. You would have had to parlay both quarters together. Thus, each bet (by itself)... at $5 per split... would have been worth $150, if you had bet them separately. Not quite the lottery odds you made it out to be.

The fact is, this was a must-win for the Bucks, on their home court, and not a must-win for the Pacers, who can still close out the series at home in game 6. In other words, very high-level of motivation for the Bucks, and very low-level of motivation for the Pacers.

I'm not in any way discounting the fact that the NBA rigs the shit out of playoff games and series.... just saying, if you assumed the Pacers would blow out the Bucks just because the Bucks were down and depleted... that's not a very smart assumption.

At some point you need to learn how to factor the human element in sports betting. 

Of course Pacers were going to have an off shooting when they were unconscious last game and everyone including media all crowned them as winners of the series with Bucks also missing their best players. 

Only thing that surprised me is that Bucks didn't give up. That's rare in the NBA in a situation like this. 

Makes it so hard and frustrating ro handicap …its sickening is what it is who says he not fixed or full of shit

A Pacers win should have been close to a given with a small chance of a close Bucks win but a Bucks blowout WITHOUT Greek Freak or Lillard? Impossible! Getting outscored 28 in the middle 2 quarters by such a team is DISGRACEFUL!

Would you stop fkin crying if you saw the line the total and Scott Foster you should have had a clue. Better luck next time Youngblood 

Less scoring in a potential close out game. 

So just to understand your argument... the only way the Pacers could be beat by the Bucks without Giannis and Lillard, is if the game was fixed?  We shouldn't consider the fact that the Bucks were the more motivated team, or even that the Bucks are better defensively without Lillard?

Would be hard to find a better example of the kind of thinking that leads most sports bettors to lose money...

I didn't bet the game, but I fully expected the Bucks to win the game, simply as an impartial observer who understands the ebb and flow of the NBA playoffs.