Celtics are clearly the better team winning by 8 and 27pts in last two games. no one in the media is giving philly a chance to even win a game against bos. So why is this line still opening at -5. shouldn't it be -6 or -7...
I keep seeing LARGE or max bet by the celtics name in this forum. And 4 experts on sportsline.com picked celtics to win tonight. *red flag*
also all the faves won yesterday. if you don't think that this has an impact on today you are clueless about the sports BUSINESS.
And as SW pointed out Foster is on this game and we saw what happened to the favorite in the LAC game when Foster is involved. this isn't by accident.
Yes philly played like shit but can't these professional nba players make adjustments and win....crickets
I'm riding with SW and taking philly ML like we did on Dallas in game 2 unless one of the trolls can convince me otherwise. -5 on Bos seems like a trap.
yes, my grammar, spelling, and punctuation are off. no one cares, find something else to troll about.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Celtics are clearly the better team winning by 8 and 27pts in last two games. no one in the media is giving philly a chance to even win a game against bos. So why is this line still opening at -5. shouldn't it be -6 or -7...
I keep seeing LARGE or max bet by the celtics name in this forum. And 4 experts on sportsline.com picked celtics to win tonight. *red flag*
also all the faves won yesterday. if you don't think that this has an impact on today you are clueless about the sports BUSINESS.
And as SW pointed out Foster is on this game and we saw what happened to the favorite in the LAC game when Foster is involved. this isn't by accident.
Yes philly played like shit but can't these professional nba players make adjustments and win....crickets
I'm riding with SW and taking philly ML like we did on Dallas in game 2 unless one of the trolls can convince me otherwise. -5 on Bos seems like a trap.
yes, my grammar, spelling, and punctuation are off. no one cares, find something else to troll about.
I thought game 2 was a trap lol .. who else is keeping up the scoring pace on Philly's end besides embiid ? Harris has been ghost and they have no point guard lol
0
I thought game 2 was a trap lol .. who else is keeping up the scoring pace on Philly's end besides embiid ? Harris has been ghost and they have no point guard lol
I thought game 2 was a trap lol .. who else is keeping up the scoring pace on Philly's end besides embiid ? Harris has been ghost and they have no point guard lol
Well horfords sister just slammed philly coach on social media so you know he will show up today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Seymourbukz:
I thought game 2 was a trap lol .. who else is keeping up the scoring pace on Philly's end besides embiid ? Harris has been ghost and they have no point guard lol
Well horfords sister just slammed philly coach on social media so you know he will show up today.
So the line made you put money on the Sixers job done by linemakers. If the line was 12 for the Sixers which it would never be then you would bet the Celtics Lots of series go from 2-0 to 2-1 then 3-1. Pretty normal stuff. Sixers can't win away from home. Celtics are a much better team shooting the three and also get to the foul line. Boston doesn't need it's best game to beat the Sixers on a neutral court by DD. Sixers already look like they are tired in the middle of the third quarter while the Celtics look like they are playing with ease. Sixers can't guard the perimeter which pretty much means Harris and Richardson both will have to go off for the Sixers to have a chance. Celtics are pretty ruthless and going for the sweep is the most likely outcome.
God is Good and the Ball don't Lie.
0
So the line made you put money on the Sixers job done by linemakers. If the line was 12 for the Sixers which it would never be then you would bet the Celtics Lots of series go from 2-0 to 2-1 then 3-1. Pretty normal stuff. Sixers can't win away from home. Celtics are a much better team shooting the three and also get to the foul line. Boston doesn't need it's best game to beat the Sixers on a neutral court by DD. Sixers already look like they are tired in the middle of the third quarter while the Celtics look like they are playing with ease. Sixers can't guard the perimeter which pretty much means Harris and Richardson both will have to go off for the Sixers to have a chance. Celtics are pretty ruthless and going for the sweep is the most likely outcome.
So the line made you put money on the Sixers job done by linemakers. If the line was 12 for the Sixers which it would never be then you would bet the Celtics Lots of series go from 2-0 to 2-1 then 3-1. Pretty normal stuff. Sixers can't win away from home. Celtics are a much better team shooting the three and also get to the foul line. Boston doesn't need it's best game to beat the Sixers on a neutral court by DD. Sixers already look like they are tired in the middle of the third quarter while the Celtics look like they are playing with ease. Sixers can't guard the perimeter which pretty much means Harris and Richardson both will have to go off for the Sixers to have a chance. Celtics are pretty ruthless and going for the sweep is the most likely outcome.
I am with you on this. But wouldn't the line have moved in Bos favor then? It hasn't. the line has stayed the same for all 3 games -5 or -5.5.
0
Quote Originally Posted by FRANKtheBANKss:
So the line made you put money on the Sixers job done by linemakers. If the line was 12 for the Sixers which it would never be then you would bet the Celtics Lots of series go from 2-0 to 2-1 then 3-1. Pretty normal stuff. Sixers can't win away from home. Celtics are a much better team shooting the three and also get to the foul line. Boston doesn't need it's best game to beat the Sixers on a neutral court by DD. Sixers already look like they are tired in the middle of the third quarter while the Celtics look like they are playing with ease. Sixers can't guard the perimeter which pretty much means Harris and Richardson both will have to go off for the Sixers to have a chance. Celtics are pretty ruthless and going for the sweep is the most likely outcome.
I am with you on this. But wouldn't the line have moved in Bos favor then? It hasn't. the line has stayed the same for all 3 games -5 or -5.5.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.