i think it has to do with a few things, but 2 things mainly.
1.) the possible return of rose. he went from questionable to doubtful but is now a game time decision (ESPN).
2.) the celtics are not very good on b2bs. (i think they're 7-8, but 2 wins vs washington and 1 was CLippers lakers - no travel involved) they're 8 loses were mostly ugly point-wise - 13, 22, 16 , 9 12 14 19. i think i missed 1 but i dont feel like going back through the schedule.
i agree that the celtics have been playing great and 8 seems like a steal, but this is my take on why the line is where it's at. i nailed okc-mia yesterday fwiw.
0
i think it has to do with a few things, but 2 things mainly.
1.) the possible return of rose. he went from questionable to doubtful but is now a game time decision (ESPN).
2.) the celtics are not very good on b2bs. (i think they're 7-8, but 2 wins vs washington and 1 was CLippers lakers - no travel involved) they're 8 loses were mostly ugly point-wise - 13, 22, 16 , 9 12 14 19. i think i missed 1 but i dont feel like going back through the schedule.
i agree that the celtics have been playing great and 8 seems like a steal, but this is my take on why the line is where it's at. i nailed okc-mia yesterday fwiw.
i think it has to do with a few things, but 2 things mainly.
1.) the possible return of rose. he went from questionable to doubtful but is now a game time decision (ESPN).
2.) the celtics are not very good on b2bs. (i think they're 7-8, but 2 wins vs washington and 1 was CLippers lakers - no travel involved) they're 8 loses were mostly ugly point-wise - 13, 22, 16 , 9 12 14 19. i think i missed 1 but i dont feel like going back through the schedule.
i agree that the celtics have been playing great and 8 seems like a steal, but this is my take on why the line is where it's at. i nailed okc-mia yesterday fwiw.
Appreciate that perspective, youk..........
0
Quote Originally Posted by youknits:
i think it has to do with a few things, but 2 things mainly.
1.) the possible return of rose. he went from questionable to doubtful but is now a game time decision (ESPN).
2.) the celtics are not very good on b2bs. (i think they're 7-8, but 2 wins vs washington and 1 was CLippers lakers - no travel involved) they're 8 loses were mostly ugly point-wise - 13, 22, 16 , 9 12 14 19. i think i missed 1 but i dont feel like going back through the schedule.
i agree that the celtics have been playing great and 8 seems like a steal, but this is my take on why the line is where it's at. i nailed okc-mia yesterday fwiw.
I will agree that boston doesnt play good on b2b games. And tonite Rose returns the Bulls are a different team with Rose at the lead. I saw Boston in a dog fight last night with the Spurs and i do think it will be a great game with Rose back and i think the Bulls who are in need of a win will cover tonight strongly against the spread.
0
I will agree that boston doesnt play good on b2b games. And tonite Rose returns the Bulls are a different team with Rose at the lead. I saw Boston in a dog fight last night with the Spurs and i do think it will be a great game with Rose back and i think the Bulls who are in need of a win will cover tonight strongly against the spread.
I will agree that boston doesnt play good on b2b games. And tonite Rose returns the Bulls are a different team with Rose at the lead. I saw Boston in a dog fight last night with the Spurs and i do think it will be a great game with Rose back and i think the Bulls who are in need of a win will cover tonight strongly against the spread.
I figured Rose must be back.
That accounts for the -7.
Thanks, Missip...........
0
Quote Originally Posted by mrmississippi:
I will agree that boston doesnt play good on b2b games. And tonite Rose returns the Bulls are a different team with Rose at the lead. I saw Boston in a dog fight last night with the Spurs and i do think it will be a great game with Rose back and i think the Bulls who are in need of a win will cover tonight strongly against the spread.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
