-meaning there isn't much of a foul discrepancy. if anything, it just means that warriors don't play defense properly and spurs are well known for their defense (and we all know that). fouls = poor defense.
Warriors were 8/31 (25%) from three point range
Spurs were 11/27 (40%) from three point range
None of these key stats could be influenced by the refs. These happened simply because the Warriors played badly, and the Spurs played great. Seriously, how can you blame the refs when Warriors are basically giving the ball away from stupid shot selection?
It's not fair to blame the entire game on a tip in btw. It's extremely hard for referees to see things like that, which is why you only see offensive interference called very rarely. When's the last time you saw that call? It's very hard to make. AND YOU CAN'T REVIEW A PLAY IF THERE WASN'T A CALL IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Anyway, please don't insult the intelligence of people by saying it's a fix just because your team sucked so bad. It was all their fault and they played like shit.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Here are some notable game stats:
Warriors had 24 turnovers
Spurs scored 31 points off turnovers
Warriors had 9 fast break points
Spurs had 23 fast break points
Warriors shot 11 free throws
Spurs shot 19 free throws
-meaning there isn't much of a foul discrepancy. if anything, it just means that warriors don't play defense properly and spurs are well known for their defense (and we all know that). fouls = poor defense.
Warriors were 8/31 (25%) from three point range
Spurs were 11/27 (40%) from three point range
None of these key stats could be influenced by the refs. These happened simply because the Warriors played badly, and the Spurs played great. Seriously, how can you blame the refs when Warriors are basically giving the ball away from stupid shot selection?
It's not fair to blame the entire game on a tip in btw. It's extremely hard for referees to see things like that, which is why you only see offensive interference called very rarely. When's the last time you saw that call? It's very hard to make. AND YOU CAN'T REVIEW A PLAY IF THERE WASN'T A CALL IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Anyway, please don't insult the intelligence of people by saying it's a fix just because your team sucked so bad. It was all their fault and they played like shit.
anything under 2 minutes or in overtime can be reviewed bud, including basket interference called or not called. Why do you think the GSW coach was out on the court yelling to the refs for a review. And a those 5 fouls in a row in the 4th quarter change the entire game. Putting a team in the bonus with 9 minutes left changes how your team can play defense. Not only that, it put Lee in foul trouble, (5) I think there were three fouls called on him in like a minute in the fourth. Now he can't play as aggressive as he wants to, and neither can the whole team in fear of giving the spurs free opportunities to score. And we all know that a foul in general disrupts the pace for the GSW and also deflates any kind of momentum.
Classic charge foul called on curry when it looked as though the GSW could start taking over in the 4th. The man was still moving, and curry slipt his shoulder. This had the crowd on their feet and could have swung the momentum over GSW way, nope, another foul called by the refs. Please dude, i've never complained about a fix before, this one was just obvious.
0
anything under 2 minutes or in overtime can be reviewed bud, including basket interference called or not called. Why do you think the GSW coach was out on the court yelling to the refs for a review. And a those 5 fouls in a row in the 4th quarter change the entire game. Putting a team in the bonus with 9 minutes left changes how your team can play defense. Not only that, it put Lee in foul trouble, (5) I think there were three fouls called on him in like a minute in the fourth. Now he can't play as aggressive as he wants to, and neither can the whole team in fear of giving the spurs free opportunities to score. And we all know that a foul in general disrupts the pace for the GSW and also deflates any kind of momentum.
Classic charge foul called on curry when it looked as though the GSW could start taking over in the 4th. The man was still moving, and curry slipt his shoulder. This had the crowd on their feet and could have swung the momentum over GSW way, nope, another foul called by the refs. Please dude, i've never complained about a fix before, this one was just obvious.
Shaner is 110% on the money anyone who can't see that just doesn't know basketball refs killed any momentum with that "charge" I don't think gsw ever got into the bonus spurs must play perfect D eh?
0
Shaner is 110% on the money anyone who can't see that just doesn't know basketball refs killed any momentum with that "charge" I don't think gsw ever got into the bonus spurs must play perfect D eh?
anything under 2 minutes or in overtime can be reviewed bud, including basket interference called or not called. Why do you think the GSW coach was out on the court yelling to the refs for a review. And a those 5 fouls in a row in the 4th quarter change the entire game. Putting a team in the bonus with 9 minutes left changes how your team can play defense. Not only that, it put Lee in foul trouble, (5) I think there were three fouls called on him in like a minute in the fourth. Now he can't play as aggressive as he wants to, and neither can the whole team in fear of giving the spurs free opportunities to score. And we all know that a foul in general disrupts the pace for the GSW and also deflates any kind of momentum.
Classic charge foul called on curry when it looked as though the GSW could start taking over in the 4th. The man was still moving, and curry slipt his shoulder. This had the crowd on their feet and could have swung the momentum over GSW way, nope, another foul called by the refs. Please dude, i've never complained about a fix before, this one was just obvious.
All of your arguments are based on opinion, not facts.
1.) You can only review a call if there was a call in the first place. There was no call in the first place. Have you ever seen an instance wherein a call was manufactured when there was none? Never ever.
2.) The charge could have gone either way. Mills was outside the restricted area with his hands up, and on the replay, it looks like a charge to me. The refs are calling on a second that something happens. You can't blame them just because your opinion is different, especially since it was close.
3.) Stop complaining about fouls when the numbers clearly show that the free throw discrepancy isn't that big. 19-11 is something we see every day. Don't let your love for your Warriors or your lost money cloud your judgment.
4.) Look at the numbers and tell me if any of them can be doubted. Tell me, did the Warriors play well enough to win? No they did not. They sucked in that game and you know it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Shaner2003:
anything under 2 minutes or in overtime can be reviewed bud, including basket interference called or not called. Why do you think the GSW coach was out on the court yelling to the refs for a review. And a those 5 fouls in a row in the 4th quarter change the entire game. Putting a team in the bonus with 9 minutes left changes how your team can play defense. Not only that, it put Lee in foul trouble, (5) I think there were three fouls called on him in like a minute in the fourth. Now he can't play as aggressive as he wants to, and neither can the whole team in fear of giving the spurs free opportunities to score. And we all know that a foul in general disrupts the pace for the GSW and also deflates any kind of momentum.
Classic charge foul called on curry when it looked as though the GSW could start taking over in the 4th. The man was still moving, and curry slipt his shoulder. This had the crowd on their feet and could have swung the momentum over GSW way, nope, another foul called by the refs. Please dude, i've never complained about a fix before, this one was just obvious.
All of your arguments are based on opinion, not facts.
1.) You can only review a call if there was a call in the first place. There was no call in the first place. Have you ever seen an instance wherein a call was manufactured when there was none? Never ever.
2.) The charge could have gone either way. Mills was outside the restricted area with his hands up, and on the replay, it looks like a charge to me. The refs are calling on a second that something happens. You can't blame them just because your opinion is different, especially since it was close.
3.) Stop complaining about fouls when the numbers clearly show that the free throw discrepancy isn't that big. 19-11 is something we see every day. Don't let your love for your Warriors or your lost money cloud your judgment.
4.) Look at the numbers and tell me if any of them can be doubted. Tell me, did the Warriors play well enough to win? No they did not. They sucked in that game and you know it.
Turnovers are always an issue with the Warriors and I know this because I am a fan and watch almost all their games. 24 turnovers against a quality team like the Spurs is too much to get a W.
0
Turnovers are always an issue with the Warriors and I know this because I am a fan and watch almost all their games. 24 turnovers against a quality team like the Spurs is too much to get a W.
All of your arguments are based on opinion, not facts.
1.) You can only review a call if there was a call in the first place. There was no call in the first place. Have you ever seen an instance wherein a call was manufactured when there was none? Never ever.
2.) The charge could have gone either way. Mills was outside the restricted area with his hands up, and on the replay, it looks like a charge to me. The refs are calling on a second that something happens. You can't blame them just because your opinion is different, especially since it was close.
3.) Stop complaining about fouls when the numbers clearly show that the free throw discrepancy isn't that big. 19-11 is something we see every day. Don't let your love for your Warriors or your lost money cloud your judgment.
4.) Look at the numbers and tell me if any of them can be doubted. Tell me, did the Warriors play well enough to win? No they did not. They sucked in that game and you know it.
Your in denial. Grow up
0
Quote Originally Posted by bugrimmar:
All of your arguments are based on opinion, not facts.
1.) You can only review a call if there was a call in the first place. There was no call in the first place. Have you ever seen an instance wherein a call was manufactured when there was none? Never ever.
2.) The charge could have gone either way. Mills was outside the restricted area with his hands up, and on the replay, it looks like a charge to me. The refs are calling on a second that something happens. You can't blame them just because your opinion is different, especially since it was close.
3.) Stop complaining about fouls when the numbers clearly show that the free throw discrepancy isn't that big. 19-11 is something we see every day. Don't let your love for your Warriors or your lost money cloud your judgment.
4.) Look at the numbers and tell me if any of them can be doubted. Tell me, did the Warriors play well enough to win? No they did not. They sucked in that game and you know it.
I agree, I was on GS, I was mad the reffing was horrible but this is the NBA, the reffing is mostly horrible for everyone, but what you say is the truth...GS lost this game and deserved to lose. Of course, that just tells me they will commit lithe to know turnovers and absolutely will not miss from long range against my Lakers saturday...
0
I agree, I was on GS, I was mad the reffing was horrible but this is the NBA, the reffing is mostly horrible for everyone, but what you say is the truth...GS lost this game and deserved to lose. Of course, that just tells me they will commit lithe to know turnovers and absolutely will not miss from long range against my Lakers saturday...
I agree, I was on GS, I was mad the reffing was horrible but this is the NBA, the reffing is mostly horrible for everyone, but what you say is the truth...GS lost this game and deserved to lose. Of course, that just tells me they will commit lithe to know turnovers and absolutely will not miss from long range against my Lakers saturday...
they'll catch the lakers in a good spot, off a back to back in which the lakers put up a valiant effort against the t-wolves. it's hard to spank the same team twice on the road in the same year. curry tries to make the magical pass every time and half of them look lazy and half look magical. turnover machine.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LineKiller28:
I agree, I was on GS, I was mad the reffing was horrible but this is the NBA, the reffing is mostly horrible for everyone, but what you say is the truth...GS lost this game and deserved to lose. Of course, that just tells me they will commit lithe to know turnovers and absolutely will not miss from long range against my Lakers saturday...
they'll catch the lakers in a good spot, off a back to back in which the lakers put up a valiant effort against the t-wolves. it's hard to spank the same team twice on the road in the same year. curry tries to make the magical pass every time and half of them look lazy and half look magical. turnover machine.
hey bugrimmer u left out the block splitter didi on curry the ball went out of bounds and the play went on and spurs scored.....u notice no replay was ever shown that game had rigged all over it bud....but hey sometimes its in yur favour sometimes not you just gotta pick the right side of the fix
0
hey bugrimmer u left out the block splitter didi on curry the ball went out of bounds and the play went on and spurs scored.....u notice no replay was ever shown that game had rigged all over it bud....but hey sometimes its in yur favour sometimes not you just gotta pick the right side of the fix
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.