All Forums | NBA Betting

Well blazers got what they probably didnt ask for

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1179
Posts: 14
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 8603
Posted: #1
A meeting with OKC. We know it was their intention to throw this game to avoid playing them but kings were determined not to let that happen.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 9988
Posted: #2

 confused Blazers put up 136 points, didn't look like a team trying to throw a game..

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 8603
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by PLAYAAAA1969:

 confused Blazers put up 136 points, didn't look like a team trying to throw a game..


Come on don't be an idiot of course the coach wasn't like hey guys lets throw the game tonight. The lineup spoke for it self starting a bunch guys most have never heard of and only 1 coming off the bench. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 8603
Posted: #4
Even Portland's good bench players were held out tonight. Does sound like a coach who was desperate to win tonight
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2019
Posts: 29
Posted: #5

What I would like to know is why did Dave Joeger take out his starters after HT with a big lead. The NBA needs to look into this for some kind of action. It seemed like he was throwing the game on purpose or something.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2017
Posts: 316
Posted: #6

Quote Originally Posted by Kaname484:

Quote Originally Posted by PLAYAAAA1969:

  Blazers put up 136 points, didn't look like a team trying to throw a game..
Come on don't be an idiot of course the coach wasn't like hey guys lets throw the game tonight. The lineup spoke for it self starting a bunch guys most have never heard of and only 1 coming off the bench.

If you noticed Stotts face at end, his expression did not resemble that of a coach who's team won the game..he played 6 guys only and 5 played 40 mins plus..he didn't expect that lineup to pull off a win lol.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2017
Posts: 316
Posted: #7

Quote Originally Posted by Thegreek1975:

What I would like to know is why did Dave Joeger take out his starters after HT with a big lead. The NBA needs to look into this for some kind of action. It seemed like he was throwing the game on purpose or something.

I was wondering same thing, I noticed he threw together a patchwork non scoring lineup in 4th qtr..as if he was showing Stotts that him trying to blatantly lose the game is not going to work today, I have something for you.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2014
Posts: 58
Posted: #8
Lol
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 10141
Posted: #9
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20818
Posted: #10

Teams often play bottom of therptation line-ups at the end of seasons. Only losers make excuses for losses. That's why you're doomed to stay losers. You don't learn from your losses. You don't ask, "What did I learn from this?" You scream fix. Trying to cap the last few games of the season is like trying to cap the preseason. It's possible but trying to fo it points to you being degenerate and a loser.

TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 20818
Posted: #11

Quote Originally Posted by Kaname484:

A meeting with OKC. We know it was their intention to throw this game to avoid playing them but kings were determined not to let that happen.
Quote Originally Posted by Kaname484:

Quote Originally Posted by PLAYAAAA1969:

  Blazers put up 136 points, didn't look like a team trying to throw a game..
Come on don't be an idiot of course the coach wasn't like hey guys lets throw the game tonight. The lineup spoke for it self starting a bunch guys most have never heard of and only 1 coming off the bench.

TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2018
Posts: 1009
Posted: #12

Quote Originally Posted by Kaname484:

A meeting with OKC. We know it was their intention to throw this game to avoid playing them but kings were determined not to let that happen.
bullsheet. If they wanted to lose they would have. Game was rigged for portland for this very reason people thought they wanted to lose. I also spotted that before gamd started or thought about that so I left Sacramento off my ticket as capping the games pointed to Sacramento being the better play. Usually going wth the script is the best option

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 8603
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

Quote Originally Posted by Kaname484:

Quote Originally Posted by PLAYAAAA1969:

  Blazers put up 136 points, didn't look like a team trying to throw a game.. Come on don't be an idiot of course the coach wasn't like hey guys lets throw the game tonight. The lineup spoke for it self starting a bunch guys most have never heard of and only 1 coming off the bench.


Who ever put together that awful Blazers lineup had no intentions on desperately wanting to win.  Normally when you put together a shi.t lineup you get shi.tty results.  Just look at the Knicks.  
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 24567
Posted: #14
Are you kidding me the blazers would much rather deal with the thunder and a gimpy George and this side of the bracket 
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.