What's w. this Celtics line?

Why are Celtics -2.5 vs the Kings?

Kings are without Fox, Celtics are 10-1, 5-1 on the road. The outscore the kings on avg and give up less points. I DONT GET IT

IT'S. A. TRAP.

but really i'm not sure. definitely have to like the celtics here. 

Plus it's an afternoon game, Celtics have already won 10 in a row. I'm wondering if they are going to drop one today in a close game. My gut tells me Celtics will win though.

Taking Celtics ML @ 1.71 for $1,500. pays about $2,600. Lets see what happens here

Kings no Fox and Bagley...

I see a few Sac picks on the forum but no ones explained why they picked em yet lol. Makes no sense

If you guy's haven't noticed, the Kings are playing pretty well and knocking down a lot of 3s. They've won 3 of there last 5, and almost went 5 for 5 with close losses to Toronto and LA on the road. The Celtics also almost lost the last game to a very poor GS team that lost Dlo in the game. If Boston, comes out like they did in GS, then I see a Kings win. Kings are hungry and this game is much bigger for them and their crowd.

I hear you, maybe those are the reasons the line is low. But my response would be, Kings seem to have good runs but have a hard time closing it out, or at least that's what recent history shows. The Celtics on the other hand, are ECF contenders - even currently with Hayward out. The SACs aren't. Not even with Fox & Bagley healthy and in (but they're out). In SACs last five the only noteworthy win was the Jazz -- but Fox was in that game. You may be right for the reason, and anything can happen ocf they could win. I just don't see why the line is that low

got in live +4.5 Celtics got lucky