Why are Celtics -2.5 vs the Kings?
Kings are without Fox, Celtics are 10-1, 5-1 on the road. The outscore the kings on avg and give up less points. I DONT GET IT
Why are Celtics -2.5 vs the Kings?
Kings are without Fox, Celtics are 10-1, 5-1 on the road. The outscore the kings on avg and give up less points. I DONT GET IT
Why are Celtics -2.5 vs the Kings?
Kings are without Fox, Celtics are 10-1, 5-1 on the road. The outscore the kings on avg and give up less points. I DONT GET IT
Plus it's an afternoon game, Celtics have already won 10 in a row. I'm wondering if they are going to drop one today in a close game. My gut tells me Celtics will win though.
Plus it's an afternoon game, Celtics have already won 10 in a row. I'm wondering if they are going to drop one today in a close game. My gut tells me Celtics will win though.
If you guy's haven't noticed, the Kings are playing pretty well and knocking down a lot of 3s. They've won 3 of there last 5, and almost went 5 for 5 with close losses to Toronto and LA on the road. The Celtics also almost lost the last game to a very poor GS team that lost Dlo in the game. If Boston, comes out like they did in GS, then I see a Kings win. Kings are hungry and this game is much bigger for them and their crowd.
If you guy's haven't noticed, the Kings are playing pretty well and knocking down a lot of 3s. They've won 3 of there last 5, and almost went 5 for 5 with close losses to Toronto and LA on the road. The Celtics also almost lost the last game to a very poor GS team that lost Dlo in the game. If Boston, comes out like they did in GS, then I see a Kings win. Kings are hungry and this game is much bigger for them and their crowd.
I hear you, maybe those are the reasons the line is low. But my response would be, Kings seem to have good runs but have a hard time closing it out, or at least that's what recent history shows. The Celtics on the other hand, are ECF contenders - even currently with Hayward out. The SACs aren't. Not even with Fox & Bagley healthy and in (but they're out). In SACs last five the only noteworthy win was the Jazz -- but Fox was in that game. You may be right for the reason, and anything can happen ocf they could win. I just don't see why the line is that low
I hear you, maybe those are the reasons the line is low. But my response would be, Kings seem to have good runs but have a hard time closing it out, or at least that's what recent history shows. The Celtics on the other hand, are ECF contenders - even currently with Hayward out. The SACs aren't. Not even with Fox & Bagley healthy and in (but they're out). In SACs last five the only noteworthy win was the Jazz -- but Fox was in that game. You may be right for the reason, and anything can happen ocf they could win. I just don't see why the line is that low
![]()
![]()
