Cause it's a damn winner! Everybody is blinded by the fact that last week Chicago lit up the Colts and GB got lit up by a pretty efficient machine called the 49ers.... The bottom line is this! Chicago will come out establishing the run which will eat up the first half of the game, as will GB! GB never got any ground game established last week (which was tough then and will damn sure be tough tonight) and will at least try to establish it early.... The first half is probably gonna be a low total unless special teams score which is very possible!
With that being said the second half will more than likely be a shoot out. I do see a lot of turnovers occurring this game more from Chicago! The reason I say this is because Green Bay will be blitzing a lot due to Cutler's history with pressure and int's... But at the same time Aaron Rogers could be without a main target which could lead to errant throws with timing and other factors.
There is no doubt in my mind these two teams can score! But due to the average square seeing last weeks score and the ability of Green Bays offensive capability this line is set too high! I see it being a 24-13 type of total covering by a touchdown below at least...
Just an opinion by the way for all you covers crickets hating on people winning... trying to pull the down to your bitch ass level!
Under 51.5 Let's get it!!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Under 51.5
Goin with the under and this is why!
Cause it's a damn winner! Everybody is blinded by the fact that last week Chicago lit up the Colts and GB got lit up by a pretty efficient machine called the 49ers.... The bottom line is this! Chicago will come out establishing the run which will eat up the first half of the game, as will GB! GB never got any ground game established last week (which was tough then and will damn sure be tough tonight) and will at least try to establish it early.... The first half is probably gonna be a low total unless special teams score which is very possible!
With that being said the second half will more than likely be a shoot out. I do see a lot of turnovers occurring this game more from Chicago! The reason I say this is because Green Bay will be blitzing a lot due to Cutler's history with pressure and int's... But at the same time Aaron Rogers could be without a main target which could lead to errant throws with timing and other factors.
There is no doubt in my mind these two teams can score! But due to the average square seeing last weeks score and the ability of Green Bays offensive capability this line is set too high! I see it being a 24-13 type of total covering by a touchdown below at least...
Just an opinion by the way for all you covers crickets hating on people winning... trying to pull the down to your bitch ass level!
I bet Cleveland, KC, Arizona week 1 posted... I did bet GB and Tampa Bay also but I'm not sure if I wrote them up as well as my largest wager on San Diego... And unlike other I have slips to prove!
Good luck sir!
0
Quote Originally Posted by yoda666:
Gezzy please provide your nfl record for week 1
Posted?
I bet Cleveland, KC, Arizona week 1 posted... I did bet GB and Tampa Bay also but I'm not sure if I wrote them up as well as my largest wager on San Diego... And unlike other I have slips to prove!
Can't touch the under here. Cutler is capable of throwing a pick 6 & Packer's secondary is weak. Aaron Rodgers won't go two games in a row without scoring 30. Packers love to throw the ball, mate. Good luck.
0
Can't touch the under here. Cutler is capable of throwing a pick 6 & Packer's secondary is weak. Aaron Rodgers won't go two games in a row without scoring 30. Packers love to throw the ball, mate. Good luck.
I completely agree man for the same reasons. Bears want the ball out of Rodgers' hands, so they will try to play small ball and feed the running game. Gore ran all of the packers last week. And just like you said, I think GB will want to run a little more also because they have been wayyy too one dimensional. UNDER to the bankk
0
I completely agree man for the same reasons. Bears want the ball out of Rodgers' hands, so they will try to play small ball and feed the running game. Gore ran all of the packers last week. And just like you said, I think GB will want to run a little more also because they have been wayyy too one dimensional. UNDER to the bankk
I completely agree man for the same reasons. Bears want the ball out of Rodgers' hands, so they will try to play small ball and feed the running game. Gore ran all of the packers last week. And just like you said, I think GB will want to run a little more also because they have been wayyy too one dimensional. UNDER to the bankk
Who are we to say its a LOCK!! Thats not possible.. But for the reasons mentioned I like the Under. Hell, they could go out and score 100.. Who knows! Good luck sir!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sopranoman27:
I completely agree man for the same reasons. Bears want the ball out of Rodgers' hands, so they will try to play small ball and feed the running game. Gore ran all of the packers last week. And just like you said, I think GB will want to run a little more also because they have been wayyy too one dimensional. UNDER to the bankk
Who are we to say its a LOCK!! Thats not possible.. But for the reasons mentioned I like the Under. Hell, they could go out and score 100.. Who knows! Good luck sir!
Hey geezy relax pal i can show tickets aswell i had 4k on denver also had 4k on 49ers im confused by your pick though i see greenbay running riot in this game
0
Hey geezy relax pal i can show tickets aswell i had 4k on denver also had 4k on 49ers im confused by your pick though i see greenbay running riot in this game
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.