A lot of seasoned veterns are struggling thus far this year. 2019 shows us that the previous 5 years, the favorites have covered 51.8% AWAY and 51.2% HOME. but this year AWAY is in line with 53% but HOME FAVS are 36%. Regression has been a constant influence over time, so I personally will give more credence to HFs during the back nine. For 36% to get back to 51% implies a lot of HF winners....................................gl
This is an error:
The query should be : 2019
shows HF: (48.3 %) and AF; (48.8%)
so far in season 2024 we have:
HF: (47.3%) and AF: (63.8%)
Therefore the regression is fading the AFs going forward, cuz to get 63.8% back down
to near 48% will require a lot of AF losers..............just a thought...................gl
0
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
A lot of seasoned veterns are struggling thus far this year. 2019 shows us that the previous 5 years, the favorites have covered 51.8% AWAY and 51.2% HOME. but this year AWAY is in line with 53% but HOME FAVS are 36%. Regression has been a constant influence over time, so I personally will give more credence to HFs during the back nine. For 36% to get back to 51% implies a lot of HF winners....................................gl
This is an error:
The query should be : 2019
shows HF: (48.3 %) and AF; (48.8%)
so far in season 2024 we have:
HF: (47.3%) and AF: (63.8%)
Therefore the regression is fading the AFs going forward, cuz to get 63.8% back down
to near 48% will require a lot of AF losers..............just a thought...................gl
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @jowchoo Jow are you able to look up the numbers for totals of 40 or less between weeks 4-16 since 2014 total<=40 and season>2014 and 4ATS: 155-155 OU: 156-166................Nothing
total<=40 and season>2014 and 4
0
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @jowchoo Jow are you able to look up the numbers for totals of 40 or less between weeks 4-16 since 2014 total<=40 and season>2014 and 4ATS: 155-155 OU: 156-166................Nothing
[Quote: Originally Posted by jowchoo]Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @jowchoo Jow are you able to look up the numbers for totals of 40 or less between weeks 4-16 since 2014 total<=40 and season>2014 and 4ATS: 155-155 OU: 156-166................Nothing total<=40 and season>2014 and 4[/Quote
@ Jowchoo , Here's a very rare one but you can play around with it just to give you an idea of things also do AD, total <= 40 and season > 2014 and week >3 and week<17 and HF and surface =grass and temperature<25
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by jowchoo]Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @jowchoo Jow are you able to look up the numbers for totals of 40 or less between weeks 4-16 since 2014 total<=40 and season>2014 and 4ATS: 155-155 OU: 156-166................Nothing total<=40 and season>2014 and 4[/Quote
@ Jowchoo , Here's a very rare one but you can play around with it just to give you an idea of things also do AD, total <= 40 and season > 2014 and week >3 and week<17 and HF and surface =grass and temperature<25
@hoody thx pal. My best month historically has been dec and jan looking forward to temperature variables and have noticed certain coaches gameplan much better than their opponents during the winter. ..................................gl
I don't know why it show's some of these teams having a dome in post #12 unless it went by surface , I know some places have a full roof and some an opening I believe the bills and NYJ are open
0
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
@hoody thx pal. My best month historically has been dec and jan looking forward to temperature variables and have noticed certain coaches gameplan much better than their opponents during the winter. ..................................gl
I don't know why it show's some of these teams having a dome in post #12 unless it went by surface , I know some places have a full roof and some an opening I believe the bills and NYJ are open
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.