https://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/nfl-conspiracy-theory-ravens-super-bowl-script-18619255.php
@undermysac
Yeah I saw that stat. The way the refs spotted the ball on that key packer drive deep in niner territory when they were attempting to go up 10-0 won’t help this at all. Third down run that clearly came up just inches short got moved right back to a full yard away then on fourth down by my eye Love clearly got that first down leaning with the ball in front of him and he was never down on the play but again ball moved back far enough to create that massive game changing turnover on downs early. The niners go down 10-0 there and it’s gonna be super tough for them to get that game as they were being badly outplayed early and Purdy was struggling to do anything other than throw the ball to packers who dropped a couple of would be picks that hit them right in the numbers. Things like this tend to even out in the wash, go this way or that way but for my two cents that sequence I watched looked corrupt as hell. There were other questionable things that can be chalked up to shitty officiating as there always is but that sequence of the crucial ball spotting to create a massive early turnover looked very corrupt to me and it was a bad look for the NFL as far as I’m concerned. I try to be as objective as possible with these things but that looked and smelled like bullshit to me. Just my two cents.
@undermysac
Yeah I saw that stat. The way the refs spotted the ball on that key packer drive deep in niner territory when they were attempting to go up 10-0 won’t help this at all. Third down run that clearly came up just inches short got moved right back to a full yard away then on fourth down by my eye Love clearly got that first down leaning with the ball in front of him and he was never down on the play but again ball moved back far enough to create that massive game changing turnover on downs early. The niners go down 10-0 there and it’s gonna be super tough for them to get that game as they were being badly outplayed early and Purdy was struggling to do anything other than throw the ball to packers who dropped a couple of would be picks that hit them right in the numbers. Things like this tend to even out in the wash, go this way or that way but for my two cents that sequence I watched looked corrupt as hell. There were other questionable things that can be chalked up to shitty officiating as there always is but that sequence of the crucial ball spotting to create a massive early turnover looked very corrupt to me and it was a bad look for the NFL as far as I’m concerned. I try to be as objective as possible with these things but that looked and smelled like bullshit to me. Just my two cents.
@Polar_Bear
I am glad others saw this too, i am a Packer fan in Green Bay so I try to temper my conspiracy theories but there were some every questionable spots and other non calls......
@Polar_Bear
I am glad others saw this too, i am a Packer fan in Green Bay so I try to temper my conspiracy theories but there were some every questionable spots and other non calls......
Interesting. Missed that stat on the original telecast… but a bit earlier saw a post somewhere lauding Shannahan.
So I dropped a few units on Niners -1.5 when they were down 17-14.
Seems like Packers deserved the W.
GLTA.
Interesting. Missed that stat on the original telecast… but a bit earlier saw a post somewhere lauding Shannahan.
So I dropped a few units on Niners -1.5 when they were down 17-14.
Seems like Packers deserved the W.
GLTA.
Agree PB.
In fact, the Packers didn't punt until the 4th quarter. The fact that they only had 21 pts on 7 drives without punting was nuts. Shit like that rarely happens, but it can.
One could say that LaFleur could of went for a chip shot fg instead of the qb sneak on that 4th n 1. Analytics definitely said "go". Refs made a bad spot, I questioned LaFleur for not challenging the spot.
Love had a bad pic at midfield.
Then the FG miss.
Love's 2nd pic was atrocious.
The Packers dominated the line of scrimmage for most of the game. Self inflicted wounds and a questionable spot was the difference.
Agree PB.
In fact, the Packers didn't punt until the 4th quarter. The fact that they only had 21 pts on 7 drives without punting was nuts. Shit like that rarely happens, but it can.
One could say that LaFleur could of went for a chip shot fg instead of the qb sneak on that 4th n 1. Analytics definitely said "go". Refs made a bad spot, I questioned LaFleur for not challenging the spot.
Love had a bad pic at midfield.
Then the FG miss.
Love's 2nd pic was atrocious.
The Packers dominated the line of scrimmage for most of the game. Self inflicted wounds and a questionable spot was the difference.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.