database

Got my butt kicked yesterday but that's okay because just like life:  sh*t happens.  It's a new day...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Broncos@Bills...all my systems kept coming up Buff-.  Problem is:  -8' is the lowest line in all of them, which set of warning signals.  So, I went to work & couldn't find anything conclusive until I did a line & total study.  Here's what I got:  NDIV CHF rest=o:rest opo:points<=7 -7>line>-10 45<total<50 and start time<1400

'17 NOrl -8'...won s/u by 8...lost ats by a hook

'10 NYG -9'...won s/u by 8...lost ats by one & a hook

'09 Hou -7'...won s/u by 7...lost ats by a hook

f*ckin' wild

Denver-8' to win s/u by 7-8...lose ats by one & a hook to a hook

Don't get hooked!!!

Denver SU? That’s big words bruh

My bad, had Denver on my mind...

Buffalo -8' to win s/u by 7-8...lose ats by a hook to one & and hook

Packers@Eagles

P:L and P:points>27 and P:season=season and AD and p:HFL and line>3 and total<54

4-3 s/u & 7-0 ats

8.5>line>3.5

4-0 s/u & 4-0 ats & 0-4 o/u

*****Packers+5, Packers s/u on the m/l, Under 45'

I love Bills and can see a late Nix back door cover.

Keep em coming Riderx.

That last one with a team 'not off a bye'

36-6...+6 & 47

20-15...+7 & 44

10-3...+5 & 43

Packers-3

Under 42'

Incredible stat of the day:

WildCard teams that had a 2000+ yard rusher:

'84 Rams L 16-13

'97 Det L 20-10

'03 Balt L 20-17

'12 Minn L 24-10

'20 Tenn L 20-13

'24 Phil

GB+5', GB m/l, Under 45'

Playoff road teams off a s/u loss had more than 150 rush yards:

'19...Minny+7...Win s/u in OT...26-20

'04...NYJ+5'...Win s/u in OT...20-17

'24...GB+5' & 46

wow!  that almost seems counter-intuitive.  I need to think about that one.  

I'm on GB here anyway so good trend!  but i wonder why that is.  

@jefff

 It's not as great as I thought it was.  Det was an 11' pt dog vs GB who won the SB '96 & lost SB '97

well sh*t...Under GB/Phil may be sh*t...

Packers as a road dog off a s/u loss as a home fav since '04:  3-0 s/u & 3-0 ats...last one in '19

34-24

34-31

38-10

'off a s/u loss as a home fav scored more than 17pts'

GB avg 1st-half score:  17.0 - 10.3

GB avg 2nd-half score:  18.4 - 11.3

WC road teams with the highest WC round total, since 2017:

+5', 48...W 26-13 U

+1, 47...W 21-7 U

+7, 48...W 26-20 U

-3', 54'...W 20-13 U

+3', 51...W 23-17 U

+2', 48...W 31-24 O...9-7 NYG

+3, 53...L by 1pt...23-24 U

+3, 51'...Wash

Wash+3, Wash m/l, Under 51'

WC round home favs of -3 to -7, off a home game prev opp had a lead of 8+pts:

0-4 s/u...by -7 or more

0-4 ats

0-4 o/u

Wash+3, Wash m/l, Under 51'

@Riderx

 was thinking the same thing on wash+u. Lattimore should be able to give evans trouble. Not sure how wash secondary will cover the rest of the TB weapons. 

@Fackthecowboys

Good call on Wash! And under! And 1h. And mline.

I did all those and hit em 2h w points and mline but went w over figured they would top the 2h over.

Quite a finish!

I am ready to do it again. Leaning Rams, I am.

@Riderx

 Man lattimore got smoked that game. But result still came out well.