I locked this in about a month and a half ago, but I am taking under 43 in the Seahawks/Rams game for LARGE. Here is the reasoning...
When STL has the ball:
STL's RB Tre Mason is a small shifty kind of guy and the Seahawks D is perfectly suited to stop guys like that w/ their fast D-line and LB's. STL QB Nick Foles is learning a whole new system, does not have many weapons, and is going against the #1 secondary in the league. Don't think STL scores much when they have the ball.
When SEA has the ball:
SEA is a run first team and guess where the strength of the STL D is at? D-line and LB's. As good as Marshawn is I don't think he finds much success on the ground vs the STL D. Last year he had 18 carries for 53 yards with a 2.9 avg in the first game; then in the second game he had 14 carries for 60 yards with a 4.3 avg. Nothing to write home about there.
The only place SEA might have some success is in the passing game, especially with the acquisition of Jimmy Graham. However, this is week 1 so offenses may not be quite clicking yet and again, the STL D-line is downright nasty and my hope is Quinn and Long can apply constant pressure on Wilson.
Barring any fluke turnovers (pick 6, fumble in own red zone, etc.) feel like this game should go under.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I locked this in about a month and a half ago, but I am taking under 43 in the Seahawks/Rams game for LARGE. Here is the reasoning...
When STL has the ball:
STL's RB Tre Mason is a small shifty kind of guy and the Seahawks D is perfectly suited to stop guys like that w/ their fast D-line and LB's. STL QB Nick Foles is learning a whole new system, does not have many weapons, and is going against the #1 secondary in the league. Don't think STL scores much when they have the ball.
When SEA has the ball:
SEA is a run first team and guess where the strength of the STL D is at? D-line and LB's. As good as Marshawn is I don't think he finds much success on the ground vs the STL D. Last year he had 18 carries for 53 yards with a 2.9 avg in the first game; then in the second game he had 14 carries for 60 yards with a 4.3 avg. Nothing to write home about there.
The only place SEA might have some success is in the passing game, especially with the acquisition of Jimmy Graham. However, this is week 1 so offenses may not be quite clicking yet and again, the STL D-line is downright nasty and my hope is Quinn and Long can apply constant pressure on Wilson.
Barring any fluke turnovers (pick 6, fumble in own red zone, etc.) feel like this game should go under.
Well, if you look at trends, as I do, the first half of the NFL season, the OVER covers more often and the last half, the Under covers more. There are many reasons, but basically the defenses catch up.
0
Well, if you look at trends, as I do, the first half of the NFL season, the OVER covers more often and the last half, the Under covers more. There are many reasons, but basically the defenses catch up.
Well, if you look at trends, as I do, the first half of the NFL season, the OVER covers more often and the last half, the Under covers more. There are many reasons, but basically the defenses catch up.
Would u happen to have a source for that information? I'm interested to see the percentages of what ur saying.
0
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
Well, if you look at trends, as I do, the first half of the NFL season, the OVER covers more often and the last half, the Under covers more. There are many reasons, but basically the defenses catch up.
Would u happen to have a source for that information? I'm interested to see the percentages of what ur saying.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.