That's a system would only work situationally maybe even on certain weeks... If i were you ,, i would count how many times that has happend on which of the weeks against what type of opponents... There's easier ways to win if you ask me...
0
That's a system would only work situationally maybe even on certain weeks... If i were you ,, i would count how many times that has happend on which of the weeks against what type of opponents... There's easier ways to win if you ask me...
That's a system would only work situationally maybe even on certain weeks... If i were you ,, i would count how many times that has happend on which of the weeks against what type of opponents... There's easier ways to win if you ask me...
thanks for the input..... I'm about to look back. Probably a good idea
0
Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:
That's a system would only work situationally maybe even on certain weeks... If i were you ,, i would count how many times that has happend on which of the weeks against what type of opponents... There's easier ways to win if you ask me...
thanks for the input..... I'm about to look back. Probably a good idea
Breaka , have you thought about teasing double digit dogs ? Remember Sun Tzu THE ART OF WAR is to attack indirectly . I dont think a straight ahead process works in this situation .
I think Chad Milman said double digit dogs hit around 56 or 57 % . There are sharps who bet JUST by looking at the line . I think that is a stupid way to bet .
If you are going to use this strategy , I suggest you apply some kind of elimination filter , like skip a team that has a rush avg below x or is worst in the league at turnovers . Maybe go with a DD that has a margin of victory above x ... This is a risky strategy , so you need to do something about lowering your risk or increasing your reward for the same amount of risk .
0
Breaka , have you thought about teasing double digit dogs ? Remember Sun Tzu THE ART OF WAR is to attack indirectly . I dont think a straight ahead process works in this situation .
I think Chad Milman said double digit dogs hit around 56 or 57 % . There are sharps who bet JUST by looking at the line . I think that is a stupid way to bet .
If you are going to use this strategy , I suggest you apply some kind of elimination filter , like skip a team that has a rush avg below x or is worst in the league at turnovers . Maybe go with a DD that has a margin of victory above x ... This is a risky strategy , so you need to do something about lowering your risk or increasing your reward for the same amount of risk .
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
