+3 @ Jax? I mean, in CFB, betting against week 0 - week 1 overreactions was profitable. I know CFB and NFL don't correlate, but gut feeling says most people will be looking for those "overreactions" that have been coveted in the past. Give me Jags - w/e the fuck you feel like. Watson is that bad and Browns should not be even with the Jags on a neutral field.
I get it, Dak sucked too, but Watson was playing worse than Peterman, and there's no way on God's Green Earth you can convince me they fix it in a week
Saints +6.5 and ML too, cuz outside of two INTs, Dak's stats were essentially the same as Watson's. As weird as it sounds, Carr is better than Watson - in 2024
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
+3 @ Jax? I mean, in CFB, betting against week 0 - week 1 overreactions was profitable. I know CFB and NFL don't correlate, but gut feeling says most people will be looking for those "overreactions" that have been coveted in the past. Give me Jags - w/e the fuck you feel like. Watson is that bad and Browns should not be even with the Jags on a neutral field.
I get it, Dak sucked too, but Watson was playing worse than Peterman, and there's no way on God's Green Earth you can convince me they fix it in a week
Saints +6.5 and ML too, cuz outside of two INTs, Dak's stats were essentially the same as Watson's. As weird as it sounds, Carr is better than Watson - in 2024
I’m a die hard Browns fan and that was a tough watch. Need to check on the offensive line situation for next week. If they don’t have those 2 back especially Conklin Im for sure on Jags off a tough loss. No Chubb and Ford may struggle without those lineman… and than more pressure on Watson. Trying not to overreact too though but shhhit lol
Play the game. Don’t let the game play you.
0
I’m a die hard Browns fan and that was a tough watch. Need to check on the offensive line situation for next week. If they don’t have those 2 back especially Conklin Im for sure on Jags off a tough loss. No Chubb and Ford may struggle without those lineman… and than more pressure on Watson. Trying not to overreact too though but shhhit lol
I just bet the u42.5 when it was released, but I had this game at Jags -5.5 after seeing Watsons ineptitude. The fact that it was only 3 made me think the books know something I dont and under was better play. This should be an ugly 19-17, 16-13 type game. Who knows maybe even 15-12
0
I just bet the u42.5 when it was released, but I had this game at Jags -5.5 after seeing Watsons ineptitude. The fact that it was only 3 made me think the books know something I dont and under was better play. This should be an ugly 19-17, 16-13 type game. Who knows maybe even 15-12
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.