Guys lets be honest....

Vikes were down by 16 in the 3rd qtr at there home. If the packers keep foot on gas they win by more then that..then 4th qtr comes and they let them get back into the gm..Now there at Packers i think rookie qb will have a rough game in my opinion...BOL pack win by 17

Is their a more misspelled/misused werd in the Engilsh language?

I don't think their is

What did you want Ponder to do in his 1st start? Put the team on his back and beat the defending Subowl champion? He threw a couple of picks that hurt them in the 2nd half...but they hung cause of their defense. Now, did you expect Ponder to play as well as he did? or the Vikings for that matter? They scored 27pts, not bad for Ponder's 1st start. After a 2nd start vs. Cam Newton, which they won, a bye week....I would say Ponder is more comfortable now and facing the Packers again - there's some familiarity against the Packers defense. Besides, both teams have always played each other tough and I don't expect anything less from either team this game.

Chicago defeated Minn by 29 points so why GB cant do that, thay defeated chicago by 10 points?! So GB big here

with this statement, you are saying since jags beat balti and balti beat steelrs, can jags beat steelers? maybe, doubt it, but that's not how you look at a game. every week is different. and plus, GB only beat minn by 6 but beat chicago by 10, so that should mean minn is better than chicago but chicago beat minn. so therefore your reasoning is flawed. BOL with your pick nonetheless

This is the type of reasoning that loses people money.  I haven't decided who I want to play yet (may put Vikes in a teaser w/ the over), but I will not be using this reasoning.

I agree with u this statement  has nothing to do with tonights game but its MNF and we are playing at GB so come on they can blow evryone out!

very nice win..."the vikings are who we thought they were"