I’m going with cincy +4. I think that’s a great line for them if it was 2-2.5 or so I’d reconsider but I had to jump on the +4 early. Putting my faith in smokin joe..BOL
Hey fellas didn’t have a pick today but I have decided my super bowl pick I got in early
I don't trust rams to cover anything over 3 tbh. you saw what sean mcvay did today, he made so many bad play calls and challenges that it's a miracle they won. even at the end tried to be cute making SF use their timeouts instead of trying to score a TD. this guy is micromanaging so hard not to lose that it's gonna kill any momentum they have as soon as they get the lead. he's such a tool that he might even let the bengals score a touchdown while up 10 with 3 minutes to go because the analytics say the bengals will be less likely to kick onside if its outside 2 minutes. coaches lose games nowadays 100% same as andy reid play calling at the end to try to burn clock instead of scoring a td
I don't trust rams to cover anything over 3 tbh. you saw what sean mcvay did today, he made so many bad play calls and challenges that it's a miracle they won. even at the end tried to be cute making SF use their timeouts instead of trying to score a TD. this guy is micromanaging so hard not to lose that it's gonna kill any momentum they have as soon as they get the lead. he's such a tool that he might even let the bengals score a touchdown while up 10 with 3 minutes to go because the analytics say the bengals will be less likely to kick onside if its outside 2 minutes. coaches lose games nowadays 100% same as andy reid play calling at the end to try to burn clock instead of scoring a td
Rams have been scraping by week in week out. Could they win the game yeah but give me smokin joe with 4 all day every day he will keep it close. Only outcome I see them losing by more than 4 is being down 5-7 going for a money drive and falling short. I like those odds. What they got going on in cincy with this kid and the kicker they just have something about them u can’t help but trust.
Rams have been scraping by week in week out. Could they win the game yeah but give me smokin joe with 4 all day every day he will keep it close. Only outcome I see them losing by more than 4 is being down 5-7 going for a money drive and falling short. I like those odds. What they got going on in cincy with this kid and the kicker they just have something about them u can’t help but trust.
@Greenandwhite23
The Bengals seem like a team of destiny...a possible NFL narrative might be that now with all of the old geezer honky QBs retiring and heading off to the glue factory, the white-breads need a new 'great white hope' QB phenom star.
The NFL narrative for the Rams is that this team needs to generate a fan base as it could be a huge market and somebody has to pay for that fancy nut$ new stadium.
I sense the Rams winning by 3 but the Bengals covering. ![]()
@Greenandwhite23
The Bengals seem like a team of destiny...a possible NFL narrative might be that now with all of the old geezer honky QBs retiring and heading off to the glue factory, the white-breads need a new 'great white hope' QB phenom star.
The NFL narrative for the Rams is that this team needs to generate a fan base as it could be a huge market and somebody has to pay for that fancy nut$ new stadium.
I sense the Rams winning by 3 but the Bengals covering. ![]()
@lancer89074 To bad your boy Flores no coaching this February to bring in BHM.
I am not exactly a Flores' supporter at this moment in time but what is BHM???
@lancer89074 To bad your boy Flores no coaching this February to bring in BHM.
I am not exactly a Flores' supporter at this moment in time but what is BHM???
In 55 superbowls, the spread mattered only 6 times
An amazing stat...![]()
I remember Superbowl 13 opened for most bettors at Pitts - 3 1/2 and closed at Pitts - 4 1/2...the books got burned as most Steelers' bettors jumped early and most Cowboy bettors waited for the upward line movement. They referred to it as 'black sunday'. The game ended with a Pitts' 35-31 score.
In 55 superbowls, the spread mattered only 6 times
An amazing stat...![]()
I remember Superbowl 13 opened for most bettors at Pitts - 3 1/2 and closed at Pitts - 4 1/2...the books got burned as most Steelers' bettors jumped early and most Cowboy bettors waited for the upward line movement. They referred to it as 'black sunday'. The game ended with a Pitts' 35-31 score.
Quote Originally Posted by Greenandwhite23: @jpot34 3, 6, and 7 are big numbers In 55 superbowls, the spread mattered only 6 times
Most of those 6 times were in the not too distant past
Quote Originally Posted by Greenandwhite23: @jpot34 3, 6, and 7 are big numbers In 55 superbowls, the spread mattered only 6 times
Most of those 6 times were in the not too distant past
Quote Originally Posted by Greenandwhite23: @jpot34 3, 6, and 7 are big numbers In 55 superbowls, the spread mattered only 6 times
All of those 6 times it mattered is when the spread was -7 or higher. Majority were at -7
Quote Originally Posted by Greenandwhite23: @jpot34 3, 6, and 7 are big numbers In 55 superbowls, the spread mattered only 6 times
All of those 6 times it mattered is when the spread was -7 or higher. Majority were at -7
Everything I’m reading on this thread is completely irrelevant. Did the bengals play the rams in those 55 previous Super Bowls? No. These are two completely different teams and we’re taking a stance on the game objectively not based on the outcome of previous Super Bowls with completely different teams. That has no correlation.
Everything I’m reading on this thread is completely irrelevant. Did the bengals play the rams in those 55 previous Super Bowls? No. These are two completely different teams and we’re taking a stance on the game objectively not based on the outcome of previous Super Bowls with completely different teams. That has no correlation.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
