So with 65% on the giants to cover the spread and about 71% on them to win straight up, the public gets it all?! Better yet the public cashed big on the over as well. On top of that, carolina who was about a 64% spread favorite and a 56% money line favoite, wins both as well thus handing the money to the public again. Very suprising here considering these games were basically primetime games. So on to tonites game. Is the public who is all over the cards, gonna win the money AGAIN? I cant see that happening. If it does, its christmas in october. Call me crazy all you want but thos eof us who watch all the games see the shady stuff that goes on that none of us can explain.......I see baltimore covering tonite. Good luck to the cards backers, maybe im wrong. I know i was last nite in backing philly.......
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
So with 65% on the giants to cover the spread and about 71% on them to win straight up, the public gets it all?! Better yet the public cashed big on the over as well. On top of that, carolina who was about a 64% spread favorite and a 56% money line favoite, wins both as well thus handing the money to the public again. Very suprising here considering these games were basically primetime games. So on to tonites game. Is the public who is all over the cards, gonna win the money AGAIN? I cant see that happening. If it does, its christmas in october. Call me crazy all you want but thos eof us who watch all the games see the shady stuff that goes on that none of us can explain.......I see baltimore covering tonite. Good luck to the cards backers, maybe im wrong. I know i was last nite in backing philly.......
So with 65% on the giants to cover the spread and about 71% on them to win straight up, the public gets it all?! Better yet the public cashed big on the over as well. On top of that, carolina who was about a 64% spread favorite and a 56% money line favoite, wins both as well thus handing the money to the public again. Very suprising here considering these games were basically primetime games. So on to tonites game. Is the public who is all over the cards, gonna win the money AGAIN? I cant see that happening. If it does, its christmas in october. Call me crazy all you want but thos eof us who watch all the games see the shady stuff that goes on that none of us can explain.......I see baltimore covering tonite. Good luck to the cards backers, maybe im wrong. I know i was last nite in backing philly.......
If tons of sharp money comes in on BAL then yes, the public just might win tonight.
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:
So with 65% on the giants to cover the spread and about 71% on them to win straight up, the public gets it all?! Better yet the public cashed big on the over as well. On top of that, carolina who was about a 64% spread favorite and a 56% money line favoite, wins both as well thus handing the money to the public again. Very suprising here considering these games were basically primetime games. So on to tonites game. Is the public who is all over the cards, gonna win the money AGAIN? I cant see that happening. If it does, its christmas in october. Call me crazy all you want but thos eof us who watch all the games see the shady stuff that goes on that none of us can explain.......I see baltimore covering tonite. Good luck to the cards backers, maybe im wrong. I know i was last nite in backing philly.......
If tons of sharp money comes in on BAL then yes, the public just might win tonight.
So with 65% on the giants to cover the spread and about 71% on them to win straight up, the public gets it all?! Better yet the public cashed big on the over as well. On top of that, carolina who was about a 64% spread favorite and a 56% money line favoite, wins both as well thus handing the money to the public again. Very suprising here considering these games were basically primetime games. So on to tonites game. Is the public who is all over the cards, gonna win the money AGAIN? I cant see that happening. If it does, its christmas in october. Call me crazy all you want but thos eof us who watch all the games see the shady stuff that goes on that none of us can explain.......I see baltimore covering tonite. Good luck to the cards backers, maybe im wrong. I know i was last nite in backing philly.......
Giants won and covered last night because they were the better team. Panthers won and covered last night because they were the better team.
Cardinals cover and win tonight because they are the better team. The lines are set based on ppg, injuries, and public "perception". Bookies don't know the outcome. They have a very very good idea on what team has the highest statistical chance of winning. They want as close to even action as possible.
And, the "consensus data" you see posted on covers is not a true, 100% real time representation of the actual money wagered world wide on each side. Of course, that is what we're supposed to think. .
0
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:
So with 65% on the giants to cover the spread and about 71% on them to win straight up, the public gets it all?! Better yet the public cashed big on the over as well. On top of that, carolina who was about a 64% spread favorite and a 56% money line favoite, wins both as well thus handing the money to the public again. Very suprising here considering these games were basically primetime games. So on to tonites game. Is the public who is all over the cards, gonna win the money AGAIN? I cant see that happening. If it does, its christmas in october. Call me crazy all you want but thos eof us who watch all the games see the shady stuff that goes on that none of us can explain.......I see baltimore covering tonite. Good luck to the cards backers, maybe im wrong. I know i was last nite in backing philly.......
Giants won and covered last night because they were the better team. Panthers won and covered last night because they were the better team.
Cardinals cover and win tonight because they are the better team. The lines are set based on ppg, injuries, and public "perception". Bookies don't know the outcome. They have a very very good idea on what team has the highest statistical chance of winning. They want as close to even action as possible.
And, the "consensus data" you see posted on covers is not a true, 100% real time representation of the actual money wagered world wide on each side. Of course, that is what we're supposed to think. .
The better team....ok......what does that mean? U mean to tell me that in every game played, the "better" team wins the game? I understand it'sonnow, you want to play the straight and narrow angle thinking that games are just played straight up but no way bud. Watch the Julio jones no td call when it was evident he got over the plane. Atlanta hits that and 82% of the public win. Vegas wasn't having it. How bout last week in the Bears lions game witht the golden Tate supposed td that got reversed? You really buy all that crap about the rule and how it differs here and there? Detroit needed to cover that game because they hadn't covered all year and the Bears had two gifts givens to them already in the KC and Oakland game. As for the Giants game, I'm not so sure New York is the better team.....you think what you want but in the Carolina game, two dropped tds. And a kick out of bounds by philly? Haaaaaaaa. That cost them 17 points. Oh yeah the missed fg that would have made it 2, thus getting philly under the number. You say coincidence, I say nope. The garbage fg at the end of the game in the Jets game got them the cover when almost 70% were on the pats. Coincidence.....nope! We can beg to differ though. If you bet games thinking the better team wins straight up every week, you are prolly broke. If you don't think the refs have a hand in some of these games, you are nuts. Also if you don't think players are aware of these things you are nuts too. Aaron Rodgers goes how many home games and consecutive passes without an int, then, against San diego, San Diego, he throws two and fumbles? What happened to san diego against Oakland, the same Oakland team that lost to the Bears?! Open your eyes man. I could go on and on. Good luck though.
0
The better team....ok......what does that mean? U mean to tell me that in every game played, the "better" team wins the game? I understand it'sonnow, you want to play the straight and narrow angle thinking that games are just played straight up but no way bud. Watch the Julio jones no td call when it was evident he got over the plane. Atlanta hits that and 82% of the public win. Vegas wasn't having it. How bout last week in the Bears lions game witht the golden Tate supposed td that got reversed? You really buy all that crap about the rule and how it differs here and there? Detroit needed to cover that game because they hadn't covered all year and the Bears had two gifts givens to them already in the KC and Oakland game. As for the Giants game, I'm not so sure New York is the better team.....you think what you want but in the Carolina game, two dropped tds. And a kick out of bounds by philly? Haaaaaaaa. That cost them 17 points. Oh yeah the missed fg that would have made it 2, thus getting philly under the number. You say coincidence, I say nope. The garbage fg at the end of the game in the Jets game got them the cover when almost 70% were on the pats. Coincidence.....nope! We can beg to differ though. If you bet games thinking the better team wins straight up every week, you are prolly broke. If you don't think the refs have a hand in some of these games, you are nuts. Also if you don't think players are aware of these things you are nuts too. Aaron Rodgers goes how many home games and consecutive passes without an int, then, against San diego, San Diego, he throws two and fumbles? What happened to san diego against Oakland, the same Oakland team that lost to the Bears?! Open your eyes man. I could go on and on. Good luck though.
The better team....ok......what does that mean? U mean to tell me that in every game played, the "better" team wins the game? I understand it'sonnow, you want to play the straight and narrow angle thinking that games are just played straight up but no way bud. Watch the Julio jones no td call when it was evident he got over the plane. Atlanta hits that and 82% of the public win. Vegas wasn't having it. How bout last week in the Bears lions game witht the golden Tate supposed td that got reversed? You really buy all that crap about the rule and how it differs here and there? Detroit needed to cover that game because they hadn't covered all year and the Bears had two gifts givens to them already in the KC and Oakland game. As for the Giants game, I'm not so sure New York is the better team.....you think what you want but in the Carolina game, two dropped tds. And a kick out of bounds by philly? Haaaaaaaa. That cost them 17 points. Oh yeah the missed fg that would have made it 2, thus getting philly under the number. You say coincidence, I say nope. The garbage fg at the end of the game in the Jets game got them the cover when almost 70% were on the pats. Coincidence.....nope! We can beg to differ though. If you bet games thinking the better team wins straight up every week, you are prolly broke. If you don't think the refs have a hand in some of these games, you are nuts. Also if you don't think players are aware of these things you are nuts too. Aaron Rodgers goes how many home games and consecutive passes without an int, then, against San diego, San Diego, he throws two and fumbles? What happened to san diego against Oakland, the same Oakland team that lost to the Bears?! Open your eyes man. I could go on and on. Good luck though.
Yup I agree. I've seen many "coincidences" where a team scores in the last second to affect the spread and/or total or makes a stupid play to not cover. Lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:
The better team....ok......what does that mean? U mean to tell me that in every game played, the "better" team wins the game? I understand it'sonnow, you want to play the straight and narrow angle thinking that games are just played straight up but no way bud. Watch the Julio jones no td call when it was evident he got over the plane. Atlanta hits that and 82% of the public win. Vegas wasn't having it. How bout last week in the Bears lions game witht the golden Tate supposed td that got reversed? You really buy all that crap about the rule and how it differs here and there? Detroit needed to cover that game because they hadn't covered all year and the Bears had two gifts givens to them already in the KC and Oakland game. As for the Giants game, I'm not so sure New York is the better team.....you think what you want but in the Carolina game, two dropped tds. And a kick out of bounds by philly? Haaaaaaaa. That cost them 17 points. Oh yeah the missed fg that would have made it 2, thus getting philly under the number. You say coincidence, I say nope. The garbage fg at the end of the game in the Jets game got them the cover when almost 70% were on the pats. Coincidence.....nope! We can beg to differ though. If you bet games thinking the better team wins straight up every week, you are prolly broke. If you don't think the refs have a hand in some of these games, you are nuts. Also if you don't think players are aware of these things you are nuts too. Aaron Rodgers goes how many home games and consecutive passes without an int, then, against San diego, San Diego, he throws two and fumbles? What happened to san diego against Oakland, the same Oakland team that lost to the Bears?! Open your eyes man. I could go on and on. Good luck though.
Yup I agree. I've seen many "coincidences" where a team scores in the last second to affect the spread and/or total or makes a stupid play to not cover. Lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
