4-3 yesterday, picking up just over a unit. 1 play for Monday night football......
Pittsburgh +6.5
Perception vs reality. Perception says the Steelers sucked last week, and lost their center. Reality says Pittsburgh owns the Bengals, going 11-1-1 ATS in the last 13 meetings. Perception says the Steelers can't run the ball, especially without their center, and the rookie RB on shelf. Reality says Cincinnati didn't run the ball a lick last week either. Perception says the Bengals should be favored by almost a TD at home. Reality says the Steelers have been favored in every game vs the Bengals since '08.
The Pittsburgh D keeps them in the game, and Roethlisberger gives them a shot to win SU. Insight and comments always welcome. BOL
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
YTD: 10-4-1 +5.95 units
4-3 yesterday, picking up just over a unit. 1 play for Monday night football......
Pittsburgh +6.5
Perception vs reality. Perception says the Steelers sucked last week, and lost their center. Reality says Pittsburgh owns the Bengals, going 11-1-1 ATS in the last 13 meetings. Perception says the Steelers can't run the ball, especially without their center, and the rookie RB on shelf. Reality says Cincinnati didn't run the ball a lick last week either. Perception says the Bengals should be favored by almost a TD at home. Reality says the Steelers have been favored in every game vs the Bengals since '08.
The Pittsburgh D keeps them in the game, and Roethlisberger gives them a shot to win SU. Insight and comments always welcome. BOL
Super tough call. Arguments are valid either way. I'd be stunned if any smart bettor had more than a recreational bet on this game. I like Pitt's coaching advantage, and the fact that the public is way down on the Steelers. Good to see you, Jose, Best of Luck
0
Super tough call. Arguments are valid either way. I'd be stunned if any smart bettor had more than a recreational bet on this game. I like Pitt's coaching advantage, and the fact that the public is way down on the Steelers. Good to see you, Jose, Best of Luck
Super tough call. Arguments are valid either way. I'd be stunned if any smart bettor had more than a recreational bet on this game. I like Pitt's coaching advantage, and the fact that the public is way down on the Steelers. Good to see you, Jose, Best of Luck
It is a tough call. Perhaps I'm looking too much into the past, but I can't pass up these points. I will tip my cap if Cincinnati proves me wrong. That's the nature of flat betting. Keeps me from getting too high or too low, so I can live to fight another day. Always a pleasure, Getty. BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
Super tough call. Arguments are valid either way. I'd be stunned if any smart bettor had more than a recreational bet on this game. I like Pitt's coaching advantage, and the fact that the public is way down on the Steelers. Good to see you, Jose, Best of Luck
It is a tough call. Perhaps I'm looking too much into the past, but I can't pass up these points. I will tip my cap if Cincinnati proves me wrong. That's the nature of flat betting. Keeps me from getting too high or too low, so I can live to fight another day. Always a pleasure, Getty. BOL
Super tough call. Arguments are valid either way. I'd be stunned if any smart bettor had more than a recreational bet on this game. I like Pitt's coaching advantage, and the fact that the public is way down on the Steelers. Good to see you, Jose, Best of Luck
couldn't agree more getty
jose i like your perception vs reality breakdown...u should get your own section on PTI or something with that
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
Super tough call. Arguments are valid either way. I'd be stunned if any smart bettor had more than a recreational bet on this game. I like Pitt's coaching advantage, and the fact that the public is way down on the Steelers. Good to see you, Jose, Best of Luck
couldn't agree more getty
jose i like your perception vs reality breakdown...u should get your own section on PTI or something with that
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.