I've decided to share a bunch of my Models that I've successfully used over the years, hope you enjoy!
Model #1 of many more to come...
NFL Betting Model Hitting 77% Winners Over The Last 30 Years('91-'21)
PLAY ON a WINLESS NFL TEAM Coming Off Their BYE WEEK Who's 0-5 or Worse.
They Are Winning 77% ATS Since 1991.
W-L-P 17-5-1 ATS
The main idea behind this model was to find a situation where a team was perceived to be so bad that nobody would want to bet on them. A situation where oddsmakers would have to post a line that would create so much value on one side. A side that still will not attract the majority of dollars on the team with the historically higher probability of covering the spread (covering 77% last 30 years). The reason why the winless (0-5 off a bye) team is the correct side is based on the dynamics of how the line is created. As many of you know the goal of the oddsmaker is to create a line in the hopes of achieving equal betting dollars on both sides. Oddsmakers will have to sweeten the pot so much in the favor of the winless team, coupled with the fact that they get an extra week to prepare (off BYE week) and the motivation to get their first win, these teams are ripe for the ATS cover. This model is one of the more basic ones i'll be posting. My models are usually more advanced and are not strictly situational, like this one is. I think this one is very straightforward to understand, it's a demand imbalance on one team over another that creates these historically profitable opportunities.
Talk soon...
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Hi all,
I've decided to share a bunch of my Models that I've successfully used over the years, hope you enjoy!
Model #1 of many more to come...
NFL Betting Model Hitting 77% Winners Over The Last 30 Years('91-'21)
PLAY ON a WINLESS NFL TEAM Coming Off Their BYE WEEK Who's 0-5 or Worse.
They Are Winning 77% ATS Since 1991.
W-L-P 17-5-1 ATS
The main idea behind this model was to find a situation where a team was perceived to be so bad that nobody would want to bet on them. A situation where oddsmakers would have to post a line that would create so much value on one side. A side that still will not attract the majority of dollars on the team with the historically higher probability of covering the spread (covering 77% last 30 years). The reason why the winless (0-5 off a bye) team is the correct side is based on the dynamics of how the line is created. As many of you know the goal of the oddsmaker is to create a line in the hopes of achieving equal betting dollars on both sides. Oddsmakers will have to sweeten the pot so much in the favor of the winless team, coupled with the fact that they get an extra week to prepare (off BYE week) and the motivation to get their first win, these teams are ripe for the ATS cover. This model is one of the more basic ones i'll be posting. My models are usually more advanced and are not strictly situational, like this one is. I think this one is very straightforward to understand, it's a demand imbalance on one team over another that creates these historically profitable opportunities.
Sorry fam, I'm just sleep deprived lately and snapped unabated at you,,,i take it back,,, a Kenny's Roasters Chicken opened up across the street and I've been staying up until 4am every night with my pet rock running countless SIMS on Double Dribble for the upcoming NBA season.
Sweep your Slate
#staysafe
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
3
@bay101
Sorry fam, I'm just sleep deprived lately and snapped unabated at you,,,i take it back,,, a Kenny's Roasters Chicken opened up across the street and I've been staying up until 4am every night with my pet rock running countless SIMS on Double Dribble for the upcoming NBA season.
It's all good. I didn't take it personally. The only reason I commented was I thought you were being disingenuous by asking how much his "analytics" would cost. You know, another guy on here selling something and I thought that was the reason you commented. Any way no ill will.
mmm tuna and I don't take baths (showers only).
0
@packersbackers
It's all good. I didn't take it personally. The only reason I commented was I thought you were being disingenuous by asking how much his "analytics" would cost. You know, another guy on here selling something and I thought that was the reason you commented. Any way no ill will.
The best betting system that worked for me is fading the public in the first 4 weeks of the NFL season because everyone is blind folded without knowing which teams are good or bad until around Week 4 and Week 5.
You don't need to pay for services. Fading the public is free money.
1
The best betting system that worked for me is fading the public in the first 4 weeks of the NFL season because everyone is blind folded without knowing which teams are good or bad until around Week 4 and Week 5.
You don't need to pay for services. Fading the public is free money.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.