ATS: 4-0-1 (100%) Totals: 0-1-0 (0%) Parlays: 0-2-0 (0%) 0.00% Return on Risk (will update this after Week 3) +946 pesos (~$70 usd)
Giants -3.5 500 pesos to win 455 pesos
Week 2 Recap:
It was a disappointing week; to say the least. I lost both my plays: parlays. I went from 4-1-1 overall (80%) to (4-3-1) overall (57%). On the bright side—still in positive territory and still undefeated with straight bets ATS (4-0). There are some plays for Sunday which I absolutely love. Will post them by Saturday night. The important and crucial thing is to make a profit Week 1 and always keep a profit throughout the entire season. Obviously, I want to get my overall percentage back up toward 70% or 80% but that will require an auspicious winning streak and time. Hopefully by WEEK 6. I look forward to getting hot in coming weeks and making an exponential profit (and hitting some effing parlays). My total bets also suck (0-1) this season; but lost my second parlay last Sunday night: (OVER 49.5) because theSeahawks threw an abhorrent interception. It would have hit 48—then overtime would have pushed it to 51+. That's the difference overall from 5-2-1 and 4-3-1.
Thomas Richard Coughlin is playing for his life tonight (and his job). Cousins is the quarterback. Giants can win this by 6+ points or a touchdown. Giants are: 5-1 ATS last six Thursday games. Giants are 6-0 ATS as favorites coming off a straight-up loss. Redskins are: 0-4 ATS last four in this series. Redskins are 1-4 ATS last four overall. Sharps are on Washington; squares on Giants. My husband was born 119 years ago today. Giants are playing for their season. This is everything. The sky is the limit!
“I remember everysingle spot of light that ever gouged ashadowbeside your bones." —Zelda Fitzgerald
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
YTD: 4-3-1 (57%)
ATS: 4-0-1 (100%) Totals: 0-1-0 (0%) Parlays: 0-2-0 (0%) 0.00% Return on Risk (will update this after Week 3) +946 pesos (~$70 usd)
Giants -3.5 500 pesos to win 455 pesos
Week 2 Recap:
It was a disappointing week; to say the least. I lost both my plays: parlays. I went from 4-1-1 overall (80%) to (4-3-1) overall (57%). On the bright side—still in positive territory and still undefeated with straight bets ATS (4-0). There are some plays for Sunday which I absolutely love. Will post them by Saturday night. The important and crucial thing is to make a profit Week 1 and always keep a profit throughout the entire season. Obviously, I want to get my overall percentage back up toward 70% or 80% but that will require an auspicious winning streak and time. Hopefully by WEEK 6. I look forward to getting hot in coming weeks and making an exponential profit (and hitting some effing parlays). My total bets also suck (0-1) this season; but lost my second parlay last Sunday night: (OVER 49.5) because theSeahawks threw an abhorrent interception. It would have hit 48—then overtime would have pushed it to 51+. That's the difference overall from 5-2-1 and 4-3-1.
Thomas Richard Coughlin is playing for his life tonight (and his job). Cousins is the quarterback. Giants can win this by 6+ points or a touchdown. Giants are: 5-1 ATS last six Thursday games. Giants are 6-0 ATS as favorites coming off a straight-up loss. Redskins are: 0-4 ATS last four in this series. Redskins are 1-4 ATS last four overall. Sharps are on Washington; squares on Giants. My husband was born 119 years ago today. Giants are playing for their season. This is everything. The sky is the limit!
“I remember everysingle spot of light that ever gouged ashadowbeside your bones." —Zelda Fitzgerald
Also, Snoop Dogg is garbage. Your avatar is garbage. Are you a biased Pittsburgh fan living in Pennsylvania? USA is garbage. I used to live there. And you give a monotonous yellow emoji instead of extrapolating and offering an articulate opinion? I bet you're a Gringo capitalist. You're no libertarian socialist.
0
Also, Snoop Dogg is garbage. Your avatar is garbage. Are you a biased Pittsburgh fan living in Pennsylvania? USA is garbage. I used to live there. And you give a monotonous yellow emoji instead of extrapolating and offering an articulate opinion? I bet you're a Gringo capitalist. You're no libertarian socialist.
Thanks for the positive feedback here, Ninja Night & illflipyaforeal & erenmo99. Wish I won those damn parlays; but satisfied with my run against-the-spread. I'm researching/studying Sunday's games—so shall post plays and analysis late tonight. I was going to post a new thread—but maybe will keep it here and just update record.
I was reading some posts and ran across my own. Some of the best NFL cappers here from years' past are not off to an auspicious start—so not sure how much stock to put into their picks for Week 3. Other people are on fire after two weeks.
eronmo99: I think those are two tough games. There might be better games. Falcons look awesome—but Dallas might rally as a home (undefeated) underdog behind Weeden: who sucks. Giants easily covered against Cousins. Falcons might be overconfident: thinking they've already gone 3-0. Seahawks should cover at home—but 14.5 is always a hell of a lot of points. Maybe the Bears will rally behind Clausen? Green Bay didn't dominate the opener till Cutler threw his usual late interception.
I'm looking at a two-game parlay for tomorrow. Lots of conflicting opinions this week (as always) and difficult to gauge after only two weeks. Be back later tonight. My apologies; but I've not yet finalized my play(s) so this answer might be loquacious or unnecessarily vapid.
0
Thanks for the positive feedback here, Ninja Night & illflipyaforeal & erenmo99. Wish I won those damn parlays; but satisfied with my run against-the-spread. I'm researching/studying Sunday's games—so shall post plays and analysis late tonight. I was going to post a new thread—but maybe will keep it here and just update record.
I was reading some posts and ran across my own. Some of the best NFL cappers here from years' past are not off to an auspicious start—so not sure how much stock to put into their picks for Week 3. Other people are on fire after two weeks.
eronmo99: I think those are two tough games. There might be better games. Falcons look awesome—but Dallas might rally as a home (undefeated) underdog behind Weeden: who sucks. Giants easily covered against Cousins. Falcons might be overconfident: thinking they've already gone 3-0. Seahawks should cover at home—but 14.5 is always a hell of a lot of points. Maybe the Bears will rally behind Clausen? Green Bay didn't dominate the opener till Cutler threw his usual late interception.
I'm looking at a two-game parlay for tomorrow. Lots of conflicting opinions this week (as always) and difficult to gauge after only two weeks. Be back later tonight. My apologies; but I've not yet finalized my play(s) so this answer might be loquacious or unnecessarily vapid.
Also, Snoop Dogg is garbage. Your avatar is garbage. Are you a biased Pittsburgh fan living in Pennsylvania? USA is garbage. I used to live there. And you give a monotonous yellow emoji instead of extrapolating and offering an articulate opinion? I bet you're a Gringo capitalist. You're no libertarian socialist.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ZeldaFitzgerald:
Also, Snoop Dogg is garbage. Your avatar is garbage. Are you a biased Pittsburgh fan living in Pennsylvania? USA is garbage. I used to live there. And you give a monotonous yellow emoji instead of extrapolating and offering an articulate opinion? I bet you're a Gringo capitalist. You're no libertarian socialist.
Fade is looking confused because you can't be undefeated ATS straight Bets. It's one or the other. Either ATS undefeated (which sounds like a no), but you are undefeated on STRAIGHT plays (which I think you are). Understand?
0
Fade is looking confused because you can't be undefeated ATS straight Bets. It's one or the other. Either ATS undefeated (which sounds like a no), but you are undefeated on STRAIGHT plays (which I think you are). Understand?
Thanks for the positive feedback here, Ninja Night & illflipyaforeal & erenmo99. Wish I won those damn parlays; but satisfied with my run against-the-spread. I'm researching/studying Sunday's games—so shall post plays and analysis late tonight. I was going to post a new thread—but maybe will keep it here and just update record.
I was reading some posts and ran across my own. Some of the best NFL cappers here from years' past are not off to an auspicious start—so not sure how much stock to put into their picks for Week 3. Other people are on fire after two weeks.
eronmo99: I think those are two tough games. There might be better games. Falcons look awesome—but Dallas might rally as a home (undefeated) underdog behind Weeden: who sucks. Giants easily covered against Cousins. Falcons might be overconfident: thinking they've already gone 3-0. Seahawks should cover at home—but 14.5 is always a hell of a lot of points. Maybe the Bears will rally behind Clausen? Green Bay didn't dominate the opener till Cutler threw his usual late interception.
I'm looking at a two-game parlay for tomorrow. Lots of conflicting opinions this week (as always) and difficult to gauge after only two weeks. Be back later tonight. My apologies; but I've not yet finalized my play(s) so this answer might be loquacious or unnecessarily vapid.
Zelda,you must be a recent graduate of the "Evelyn Woodhead" Sped reddin course. I see that your comprension is below reproach, however I sense that what you lack in elocution, you more than make up for in convolution.
I'm impressed with your zeal to capitulate the masses with your ineptitude. I can only imagine how vociferously your mother must feel toward your transparently inane candor. Much like the oxymoron that your existential existence must provide, I'm confident that your propensity for self delusion will ultimately provide you with the most expedient vehicle for self annihilation and therefore humanity's salvation from banality run amok.
How bout them apples?!
0
Quote Originally Posted by ZeldaFitzgerald:
Thanks for the positive feedback here, Ninja Night & illflipyaforeal & erenmo99. Wish I won those damn parlays; but satisfied with my run against-the-spread. I'm researching/studying Sunday's games—so shall post plays and analysis late tonight. I was going to post a new thread—but maybe will keep it here and just update record.
I was reading some posts and ran across my own. Some of the best NFL cappers here from years' past are not off to an auspicious start—so not sure how much stock to put into their picks for Week 3. Other people are on fire after two weeks.
eronmo99: I think those are two tough games. There might be better games. Falcons look awesome—but Dallas might rally as a home (undefeated) underdog behind Weeden: who sucks. Giants easily covered against Cousins. Falcons might be overconfident: thinking they've already gone 3-0. Seahawks should cover at home—but 14.5 is always a hell of a lot of points. Maybe the Bears will rally behind Clausen? Green Bay didn't dominate the opener till Cutler threw his usual late interception.
I'm looking at a two-game parlay for tomorrow. Lots of conflicting opinions this week (as always) and difficult to gauge after only two weeks. Be back later tonight. My apologies; but I've not yet finalized my play(s) so this answer might be loquacious or unnecessarily vapid.
Zelda,you must be a recent graduate of the "Evelyn Woodhead" Sped reddin course. I see that your comprension is below reproach, however I sense that what you lack in elocution, you more than make up for in convolution.
I'm impressed with your zeal to capitulate the masses with your ineptitude. I can only imagine how vociferously your mother must feel toward your transparently inane candor. Much like the oxymoron that your existential existence must provide, I'm confident that your propensity for self delusion will ultimately provide you with the most expedient vehicle for self annihilation and therefore humanity's salvation from banality run amok.
Also, Snoop Dogg is garbage. Your avatar is garbage. Are you a biased Pittsburgh fan living in Pennsylvania? USA is garbage. I used to live there. And you give a monotonous yellow emoji instead of extrapolating and offering an articulate opinion? I bet you're a Gringo capitalist. You're no libertarian socialist.
I had a respect for what you are doing until I read this. Perhaps you gave me a reason to vote for Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by ZeldaFitzgerald:
Also, Snoop Dogg is garbage. Your avatar is garbage. Are you a biased Pittsburgh fan living in Pennsylvania? USA is garbage. I used to live there. And you give a monotonous yellow emoji instead of extrapolating and offering an articulate opinion? I bet you're a Gringo capitalist. You're no libertarian socialist.
I had a respect for what you are doing until I read this. Perhaps you gave me a reason to vote for Donald Trump
I think there's way too many new comments to really address them all so let's get to the picks...
Parlay:Colts -3(-120) withBills +3 (-120)
666.66 pesos To Win 1,574 pesos
(These are both "public" teams this week; but maybe for good sagacious reasons).
Colts -3
Colts need to win to keep their season alive. Colts are liable to have a huge game based on psychological edge and trends. Andrew Luck owns the Tennessee Titans in this situation. Expect Luck to have a breakout game (or the Colts could be done for the season). They can't afford to go 0-3. Indianapolis is 7-0 against-the-spread their last seven games versus Tennessee. We're getting a good line at -3. This is an overreaction to the Colts losing their first two games. Titans were on the road their first two and Teams in Week 3 home openers cover approximately 33% of the time because of all the residual fatigue—borne by two road games. Luck should be in F-U-mode and come out pissed to prove the doubters wrong. Colts come out swinging, firing on all cylinders and cover this spread.
Indianapolis Colts are:
5-1 ATS in their last 6 games in Week 3.
18-4 ATS in their last 22 games following a S.U. loss.
16-4-1 ATS in their last 21 games following a ATS loss.
6-2 ATS in their last 8 games on grass.
18-7-1 ATS in their last 26 vs. AFC South.
18-8-1 ATS in their last 27 vs. AFC and 5-1 ATS in their last 6 games in Week 3
13-2 ATS off a loss and 14-4 ATS in divisional games under Luck
Tennessee Titans are:
1-4 ATS in their last 5 games in September.
1-5 ATS in their last 6 games after accumulating more than 350 total yards in their previous game.
3-16-2 ATS in their last 21 vs. AFC.
1-7-1 ATS in their last 9 home games vs. a team with a losing road record.
1-10-2 ATS vs. a team with a losing record.
0-5 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.
16-34-4 ATS in their last 54 games overall
0
I think there's way too many new comments to really address them all so let's get to the picks...
Parlay:Colts -3(-120) withBills +3 (-120)
666.66 pesos To Win 1,574 pesos
(These are both "public" teams this week; but maybe for good sagacious reasons).
Colts -3
Colts need to win to keep their season alive. Colts are liable to have a huge game based on psychological edge and trends. Andrew Luck owns the Tennessee Titans in this situation. Expect Luck to have a breakout game (or the Colts could be done for the season). They can't afford to go 0-3. Indianapolis is 7-0 against-the-spread their last seven games versus Tennessee. We're getting a good line at -3. This is an overreaction to the Colts losing their first two games. Titans were on the road their first two and Teams in Week 3 home openers cover approximately 33% of the time because of all the residual fatigue—borne by two road games. Luck should be in F-U-mode and come out pissed to prove the doubters wrong. Colts come out swinging, firing on all cylinders and cover this spread.
Indianapolis Colts are:
5-1 ATS in their last 6 games in Week 3.
18-4 ATS in their last 22 games following a S.U. loss.
16-4-1 ATS in their last 21 games following a ATS loss.
6-2 ATS in their last 8 games on grass.
18-7-1 ATS in their last 26 vs. AFC South.
18-8-1 ATS in their last 27 vs. AFC and 5-1 ATS in their last 6 games in Week 3
13-2 ATS off a loss and 14-4 ATS in divisional games under Luck
Tennessee Titans are:
1-4 ATS in their last 5 games in September.
1-5 ATS in their last 6 games after accumulating more than 350 total yards in their previous game.
3-16-2 ATS in their last 21 vs. AFC.
1-7-1 ATS in their last 9 home games vs. a team with a losing road record.
1-10-2 ATS vs. a team with a losing record.
0-5 ATS in their last 5 games following a ATS loss.
The Bills have faced two amazing teams; the Dolphin have played garbage. Bills are the better team. Rex Ryan will want to attone for his team blowing their chances against New England. No toe-sucking here. Bills will win this or keep it close enough to cover. .
Bills have:
Won 4 of last 6 meetings
Bills are 15-9 ATS after playing the New England Patriots since 1999.
Underdog is 60-30 ATS in the Dolphins' last 90 games.
Miami is 14-40 against the spread when favored at home.
NFL teams are 6-14 against the spread prior to playing in London; with favorites being 3-8 ATS.
Teams hosting their first game in Week 3 are 18-39 against-the-spread (as they're not favored by double digits).
Rex Ryan covered both games versus Miami last year; even winning outright on the road. Buffalo has better coaching and owns this matchup.
Good luck to everybody. No matter what side you're on. 666.66 pesos in order to channel Satan telepathically to ride this godforsaken parlay to victory.
0
Buffalo +3
The Bills have faced two amazing teams; the Dolphin have played garbage. Bills are the better team. Rex Ryan will want to attone for his team blowing their chances against New England. No toe-sucking here. Bills will win this or keep it close enough to cover. .
Bills have:
Won 4 of last 6 meetings
Bills are 15-9 ATS after playing the New England Patriots since 1999.
Underdog is 60-30 ATS in the Dolphins' last 90 games.
Miami is 14-40 against the spread when favored at home.
NFL teams are 6-14 against the spread prior to playing in London; with favorites being 3-8 ATS.
Teams hosting their first game in Week 3 are 18-39 against-the-spread (as they're not favored by double digits).
Rex Ryan covered both games versus Miami last year; even winning outright on the road. Buffalo has better coaching and owns this matchup.
Good luck to everybody. No matter what side you're on. 666.66 pesos in order to channel Satan telepathically to ride this godforsaken parlay to victory.
I had a respect for what you are doing until I read this. Perhaps you gave me a reason to vote for Donald Trump
LOL, Trump is a demagogue who says whatever he thinks the crowd wants to hear. Besides, Nate Silver has already said he's not going to be the Republican nominee and he's pretty good at predicting elections.
0
Quote Originally Posted by boomersooner18:
I had a respect for what you are doing until I read this. Perhaps you gave me a reason to vote for Donald Trump
LOL, Trump is a demagogue who says whatever he thinks the crowd wants to hear. Besides, Nate Silver has already said he's not going to be the Republican nominee and he's pretty good at predicting elections.
Comments, Tenn is currently 3rd in total defense Indy 12th Indys off line is terribleTenn strength of schedule 8 Indys 5 IMO game is a coinflip Basically same with Buff however getting +3 IMO not a bad parlay to take a chance on BOL
0
Comments, Tenn is currently 3rd in total defense Indy 12th Indys off line is terribleTenn strength of schedule 8 Indys 5 IMO game is a coinflip Basically same with Buff however getting +3 IMO not a bad parlay to take a chance on BOL
Another parlay loss for me. Colts defense is awful. They deserve to be 0-3. Oh well; it's only money. It was a lilliputian parlay. Might as well go down (with parlays) like Kevin Costner in Tin Cup: trying to keep it out of the water to get onto the green. Playing for fun and betting [very] small—because it's only Week 3. Need to maintain a profit all season. Will have humongous (not really) bets (and parlays) for future weeks once bankroll is built up. This play is merely for fun. Couldn't care if it loses—?but would be nice to make up the loss of earlier parlay and break even before running out of golf balls.
Also, no time to comment on posts here or view this thread again. This will be last post here because there are too many typos and grammar errors. I will post Week 4 picks with a new thread next week. So this thread should die now. Thanks for participating though. Many of you seem nice; but others are vitriolic atavistic Australopithecines who prefer crass rudeness. It's this selfish mentality (of idiopathic anger and meritorious wounded egos) which permeates throughout the USA. It's not pure altruism. It's almost as if some of you people on this forum want to see other's losing and take joy from such vitriol. It's amateurish and immature.
Parlay: Denver Broncos -3 AND OVER 44.5 200 pesos to win 548
Not much time for thorough write-up:
-The total has gone OVER in nine of the Lions? last 10 games against the AFC West.
-Manning in primetime on Sunday night covers the spread at an auspicious rate.
-Lions will be forced to air it out.
-I think we see more than 50 points.
¡Viva México, cabrones!
0
Another parlay loss for me. Colts defense is awful. They deserve to be 0-3. Oh well; it's only money. It was a lilliputian parlay. Might as well go down (with parlays) like Kevin Costner in Tin Cup: trying to keep it out of the water to get onto the green. Playing for fun and betting [very] small—because it's only Week 3. Need to maintain a profit all season. Will have humongous (not really) bets (and parlays) for future weeks once bankroll is built up. This play is merely for fun. Couldn't care if it loses—?but would be nice to make up the loss of earlier parlay and break even before running out of golf balls.
Also, no time to comment on posts here or view this thread again. This will be last post here because there are too many typos and grammar errors. I will post Week 4 picks with a new thread next week. So this thread should die now. Thanks for participating though. Many of you seem nice; but others are vitriolic atavistic Australopithecines who prefer crass rudeness. It's this selfish mentality (of idiopathic anger and meritorious wounded egos) which permeates throughout the USA. It's not pure altruism. It's almost as if some of you people on this forum want to see other's losing and take joy from such vitriol. It's amateurish and immature.
Parlay: Denver Broncos -3 AND OVER 44.5 200 pesos to win 548
Not much time for thorough write-up:
-The total has gone OVER in nine of the Lions? last 10 games against the AFC West.
-Manning in primetime on Sunday night covers the spread at an auspicious rate.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.