Really like the under here if you look at there past 10 theres been one game over 50* Im real sharp follow me if you would like i only bet nfl! UNDER FOR MINE
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Really like the under here if you look at there past 10 theres been one game over 50* Im real sharp follow me if you would like i only bet nfl! UNDER FOR MINE
the past 10 games...meaning the last 5 years... consider who the 'skins had under center. a list of notables such as todd collins, jason campbell, rex grossman, a washed up donovan mcnabb, and john beck. the skins also now have a running back in alfred morris, and a capable group of receivers. G men beat them 27-23 at NY back in Oct. that redskin secondary is horrible and you cant trust them to stop anyone. over for me or no play on the total. your analysis is very limited rizz, i could give some more support for the over, but i hate typing.
0
the past 10 games...meaning the last 5 years... consider who the 'skins had under center. a list of notables such as todd collins, jason campbell, rex grossman, a washed up donovan mcnabb, and john beck. the skins also now have a running back in alfred morris, and a capable group of receivers. G men beat them 27-23 at NY back in Oct. that redskin secondary is horrible and you cant trust them to stop anyone. over for me or no play on the total. your analysis is very limited rizz, i could give some more support for the over, but i hate typing.
Both teams have no secondary. RGIII will shine under the lights and Eli will throw 400 passing yards. Bad special teams and turnovers result in short fields. 34-27... 61 points
0
Both teams have no secondary. RGIII will shine under the lights and Eli will throw 400 passing yards. Bad special teams and turnovers result in short fields. 34-27... 61 points
Both teams have no secondary. RGIII will shine under the lights and Eli will throw 400 passing yards. Bad special teams and turnovers result in short fields. 34-27... 61 points
0
Quote Originally Posted by jbattaglia2:
Both teams have no secondary. RGIII will shine under the lights and Eli will throw 400 passing yards. Bad special teams and turnovers result in short fields. 34-27... 61 points
Eli should be able to air it out early and often against this skins secondary. The Giants defense is nothing special either and RGlll should have no problem getting the 30 points per game that he has been averaging. I think that whoever scores last wins. Its the Giants and the over for me.
0
Eli should be able to air it out early and often against this skins secondary. The Giants defense is nothing special either and RGlll should have no problem getting the 30 points per game that he has been averaging. I think that whoever scores last wins. Its the Giants and the over for me.
the past 10 games...meaning the last 5 years... consider who the 'skins had under center. a list of notables such as todd collins, jason campbell, rex grossman, a washed up donovan mcnabb, and john beck. the skins also now have a running back in alfred morris, and a capable group of receivers. G men beat them 27-23 at NY back in Oct. that redskin secondary is horrible and you cant trust them to stop anyone. over for me or no play on the total. your analysis is very limited rizz, i could give some more support for the over, but i hate typing.
i know right... L 10 is is reasoning?
sharp as the end of a football
0
Quote Originally Posted by pigskinpicker:
the past 10 games...meaning the last 5 years... consider who the 'skins had under center. a list of notables such as todd collins, jason campbell, rex grossman, a washed up donovan mcnabb, and john beck. the skins also now have a running back in alfred morris, and a capable group of receivers. G men beat them 27-23 at NY back in Oct. that redskin secondary is horrible and you cant trust them to stop anyone. over for me or no play on the total. your analysis is very limited rizz, i could give some more support for the over, but i hate typing.
if the held the packers to only 13 what are they going to do to rg3 and that offence ? do the math giants are even better on the road and they are foreal that defence was one SERIOUS bunch last sunday night
0
if the held the packers to only 13 what are they going to do to rg3 and that offence ? do the math giants are even better on the road and they are foreal that defence was one SERIOUS bunch last sunday night
typical new poster. comes in posts an opinion, gets a discussion going , then bashes and calls everyone names that disagrees....even when those that disagree have a lot more logic and reasoned thinking going into their comments. what happened the last 19 games between these 2 has no relevance to this game rizz. the redskins are a radically different offense under mike shanahan with totally different personnel. so, the G men limited a flawed packer offense with no offensive line to `13 pts on the road.. that was last week. you havent done yourself any favors with your attitude my friend. try handicapping with a real thought process and having an intelligent respectful discussion when people post a differing opinion. if you did, we might all have better info to act on. thats the purpose here. to discuss and try to find the right play. this isnt about having an ego and trying to always prove that your opinion is always right. you sound a lot like sjabo, with a new screen name... very immature.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rizzthelock:
lmao look at the history dumbass under it is
typical new poster. comes in posts an opinion, gets a discussion going , then bashes and calls everyone names that disagrees....even when those that disagree have a lot more logic and reasoned thinking going into their comments. what happened the last 19 games between these 2 has no relevance to this game rizz. the redskins are a radically different offense under mike shanahan with totally different personnel. so, the G men limited a flawed packer offense with no offensive line to `13 pts on the road.. that was last week. you havent done yourself any favors with your attitude my friend. try handicapping with a real thought process and having an intelligent respectful discussion when people post a differing opinion. if you did, we might all have better info to act on. thats the purpose here. to discuss and try to find the right play. this isnt about having an ego and trying to always prove that your opinion is always right. you sound a lot like sjabo, with a new screen name... very immature.
Ok sorry i just really think 50 is to much beacause the first time the 2 teams played it was a real low scoring game untill the late 4th qtr 2 tds .. so i see it really being a close battled game and they are going to run the ball alot killing clock gl to all im on the under for mine
0
Ok sorry i just really think 50 is to much beacause the first time the 2 teams played it was a real low scoring game untill the late 4th qtr 2 tds .. so i see it really being a close battled game and they are going to run the ball alot killing clock gl to all im on the under for mine
i can respect that rizz. GL to you, though if i play a total it will be the over. i am about to start a thread on the rookie QBS this season at home being dogs. it may be of interest to you.
0
i can respect that rizz. GL to you, though if i play a total it will be the over. i am about to start a thread on the rookie QBS this season at home being dogs. it may be of interest to you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
