Pass interference

Am I wrong or was that last play by greenbay 100% pass interference in the endzone?

It was - in any other situation 

@DannyD007

 It was 

Ref on the eagles 

Refs protected -5.5

It was PI, but refs didn't call it (Just like the 1st play of the game).

Just move on & take the L (If you took Packer +5.5).

FYI, I was on Pack +5.5 myself. 

@LotusVale

 Good post,  Good attitude and most importantly Good advice.......Move on! 

I thought the same thing.  Oh well fucking refs were dumb as shit in this game.

NO PI, the Eagles player that intercepted the ball didn't even touch the GB player. 

I thought it was DPI, but it was a situation where the game was over.

If a defender intercepts a pass intended for a receiver they are not guarding, it is not considered defensive pass interference (DPI) because by catching the ball, they have effectively negated the receiver's opportunity to make a play on the ball, making interference irrelevant in that situation.

The Ref's got the DPI wrong on the OSU vs Texas game tho. 

If a 1st player is waiting to catch the intended pass while a 2nd player is busy running into and holding the receiver w/o any clue as to playing the ball and prior to the ball arriving in the area, it's Pass Interference. he was denied the chance to make a play on the ball intended for him.

they just chose to swallow their whistle and b***f**k those of us on the Packers +6 (or more)

Referees up to no good total pass interference missed

Definitely was

# 53  DPI  for sure.....

After the opening kickoff fumble it was ..... hmmmm..... kind of obvious if its not 100% it will be going Eagles way 

this isn’t true by a long shot - “interfering” the receiver from having a chance to defend the interception is by definition pass interference. Contact was made way before the ball was caught