Hello all. I feel that the cardinal dilemma with gaining any kind of handle on a side in this game lies in choosing whether or not to incorporate the data from the games the Fins played under Joe Philbin.
If one is truly sold on the concept that the they are a new team, then the side in this game isn't difficult to settle on -- based upon the last 2 games statistics, this line is undoubtedly somewhat inflated. I have seen much discussion citing the fact that the past 2 teams that the Dolphins have played are subpar. While this may be true, they beat these teams rather handily, which is really all they're able to do.
Nonetheless, I saw an interesting post about a week ago regarding the performance boost typical of teams who have recently fired their head coach, who are playing under an interim head coach. While Dr. John does not have any trend numbers for this situation, it may bear potential for consideration. Further, whether one believes in Campbell as being a qualified coach or not, a shortened week simply is not conducive to constructing a gameplay to beat the Patriots. As such, rather than choosing a side in this game, I will instead choose to act on the total.
For anyone who read last week's post examining potentially useful trends related to primetime games, this pick probably won't come as much of a surprise. Once again, after running the numbers (and yes, there is a similar challenge with the total about choosing which data to incorporate, as aforementioned; Dr. John inevitably had to exercise some discretion in this area), the total of 51 seems to be rather high. My model, which has done quite well as of recent, going 5-1 in picks posted on covers (5-0 in primetime games), pegs this total just above 48 points. As 49 is somewhat of a key number, there is considerable value in anything above 50 and Dr. John recommends it as a 1* play (if this total hits 52, it will qualify as 2*).
The pass rush of the Fins should be able to do just enough to keep Brady unsettled and not allow him to get comfortable in the pocket. As always, the challenge will be to exhibit reliable tackling throughout the game, as Brady will almost assuredly be forced to get the ball out to receivers quickly. On the other side of the ball, Lamar Miller will need to have success on the ground and the offense will have to keep Brady's time on the field to a minimum if the Dolphins want to keep this one a contest. Say what you will about Dan Campbell, but these both seem like areas that a "former TE coach" would excel at.
Dr. John's model suggests a 1* play on Under 51 (down to a total of 49.5; if the total reaches 52, this becomes a 2* play) for Thursday night's game.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Hello all. I feel that the cardinal dilemma with gaining any kind of handle on a side in this game lies in choosing whether or not to incorporate the data from the games the Fins played under Joe Philbin.
If one is truly sold on the concept that the they are a new team, then the side in this game isn't difficult to settle on -- based upon the last 2 games statistics, this line is undoubtedly somewhat inflated. I have seen much discussion citing the fact that the past 2 teams that the Dolphins have played are subpar. While this may be true, they beat these teams rather handily, which is really all they're able to do.
Nonetheless, I saw an interesting post about a week ago regarding the performance boost typical of teams who have recently fired their head coach, who are playing under an interim head coach. While Dr. John does not have any trend numbers for this situation, it may bear potential for consideration. Further, whether one believes in Campbell as being a qualified coach or not, a shortened week simply is not conducive to constructing a gameplay to beat the Patriots. As such, rather than choosing a side in this game, I will instead choose to act on the total.
For anyone who read last week's post examining potentially useful trends related to primetime games, this pick probably won't come as much of a surprise. Once again, after running the numbers (and yes, there is a similar challenge with the total about choosing which data to incorporate, as aforementioned; Dr. John inevitably had to exercise some discretion in this area), the total of 51 seems to be rather high. My model, which has done quite well as of recent, going 5-1 in picks posted on covers (5-0 in primetime games), pegs this total just above 48 points. As 49 is somewhat of a key number, there is considerable value in anything above 50 and Dr. John recommends it as a 1* play (if this total hits 52, it will qualify as 2*).
The pass rush of the Fins should be able to do just enough to keep Brady unsettled and not allow him to get comfortable in the pocket. As always, the challenge will be to exhibit reliable tackling throughout the game, as Brady will almost assuredly be forced to get the ball out to receivers quickly. On the other side of the ball, Lamar Miller will need to have success on the ground and the offense will have to keep Brady's time on the field to a minimum if the Dolphins want to keep this one a contest. Say what you will about Dan Campbell, but these both seem like areas that a "former TE coach" would excel at.
Dr. John's model suggests a 1* play on Under 51 (down to a total of 49.5; if the total reaches 52, this becomes a 2* play) for Thursday night's game.
I will add that market data seems to offer support for this pick, as slightly under 70% of bets are on the Over, yet the total has yet to exceed the opening consensus number of 51.5 - in fact, the number was lingering around 50 for the better portion of the week.
0
I will add that market data seems to offer support for this pick, as slightly under 70% of bets are on the Over, yet the total has yet to exceed the opening consensus number of 51.5 - in fact, the number was lingering around 50 for the better portion of the week.
I've been lurking for awhile and finally decided to make an account to tell you Doc how much I enjoy your posts. There are other good cappers on this site but few actually seem to use statistics and math like you do to support your analysis.
Thank you so much & please keep it up!!
0
I've been lurking for awhile and finally decided to make an account to tell you Doc how much I enjoy your posts. There are other good cappers on this site but few actually seem to use statistics and math like you do to support your analysis.
I agree and picked under 51 for the NFL contest on here but I made it with little confidence. The Pats haven't scored under 30 points in any game this year so for this total to go under I think the Dolphins need to limit the Pats' total possessions. Otherwise, I'm not sure it can go under given the fast starts the Dolphins have had in the 1st half the last couple of games. Primetime games have been going under, though.
0
I agree and picked under 51 for the NFL contest on here but I made it with little confidence. The Pats haven't scored under 30 points in any game this year so for this total to go under I think the Dolphins need to limit the Pats' total possessions. Otherwise, I'm not sure it can go under given the fast starts the Dolphins have had in the 1st half the last couple of games. Primetime games have been going under, though.
Sorry to be this guy but just curious... does your model have a lean either way on the spread tonight Dr. John?
Probably not going to touch it myself but even a slight lean from you may be enough to sway me to place a small wager. If not no worries, I honestly really appreciate you posting this quality insight every week free of charge.
0
Sorry to be this guy but just curious... does your model have a lean either way on the spread tonight Dr. John?
Probably not going to touch it myself but even a slight lean from you may be enough to sway me to place a small wager. If not no worries, I honestly really appreciate you posting this quality insight every week free of charge.
Sorry to be this guy but just curious... does your model have a lean either way on the spread tonight Dr. John?
Probably not going to touch it myself but even a slight lean from you may be enough to sway me to place a small wager. If not no worries, I honestly really appreciate you posting this quality insight every week free of charge.
I appreciate the kind words. Generally speaking, Dr. John is not a proponent of laying more than a field goal in division rivalry games. That notwithstanding, the patriots, from a numbers standpoint, are simply sensational. Factor in that the dolphins have lived up to preseason expectations the past 2 weeks, and that we're being asked to lay more than a TD here, and I'll have to abstain from this one. However, if I was forced to choose a side I'd likely take Fins plus the points.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Paranoid_bro:
Sorry to be this guy but just curious... does your model have a lean either way on the spread tonight Dr. John?
Probably not going to touch it myself but even a slight lean from you may be enough to sway me to place a small wager. If not no worries, I honestly really appreciate you posting this quality insight every week free of charge.
I appreciate the kind words. Generally speaking, Dr. John is not a proponent of laying more than a field goal in division rivalry games. That notwithstanding, the patriots, from a numbers standpoint, are simply sensational. Factor in that the dolphins have lived up to preseason expectations the past 2 weeks, and that we're being asked to lay more than a TD here, and I'll have to abstain from this one. However, if I was forced to choose a side I'd likely take Fins plus the points.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.