Ravens/Bengals Teaser???? Make them both even. What you guys think?
I'll be on Pitt as one of my best plays at 1...
SB loser 4 -18 ATS in week 1 last 22 yrs...
Pitt getting 7 seems a tad too high...
Divisional match-up so I'm figuring a close low scoring game....
Steelers should be run heavy burning clock which bodes well getting g a TD.
BOL Bro
I'll be on Pitt as one of my best plays at 1...
SB loser 4 -18 ATS in week 1 last 22 yrs...
Pitt getting 7 seems a tad too high...
Divisional match-up so I'm figuring a close low scoring game....
Steelers should be run heavy burning clock which bodes well getting g a TD.
BOL Bro
@jowchoo
What does "+EV play" mean? That's some lingo I haven't heard before.
Defending champs are 19-3 SU in week 1... don't know about weeks 2 and 3, or the ATS numbers.
@jowchoo
What does "+EV play" mean? That's some lingo I haven't heard before.
Defending champs are 19-3 SU in week 1... don't know about weeks 2 and 3, or the ATS numbers.
Bengals are going to be a disappointment this year. Don't have much opinion on this week 1 game, though... but as others have pointed out, SB losers usually fall on their face in week 1.
Bengals are going to be a disappointment this year. Don't have much opinion on this week 1 game, though... but as others have pointed out, SB losers usually fall on their face in week 1.
@Duderonomy
Expected Value.... plus EV implies your wager has a greater than 50% statistical probability of covering / winning.
You are calculating the value of the odds / likelihood of a cover or win based on the actual odds and vig.
@Duderonomy
Expected Value.... plus EV implies your wager has a greater than 50% statistical probability of covering / winning.
You are calculating the value of the odds / likelihood of a cover or win based on the actual odds and vig.
@getem9
Cool... understand the concept, but never saw that lazy notation before. A little hard to believe the SB winner is a losing proposition over the first 3 weeks, given that they are 19-3 SU in week 1... but I guess it's possible.
@getem9
Cool... understand the concept, but never saw that lazy notation before. A little hard to believe the SB winner is a losing proposition over the first 3 weeks, given that they are 19-3 SU in week 1... but I guess it's possible.
Yes, I didn't run the numbers but I understand what you're saying
Yes, I didn't run the numbers but I understand what you're saying
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.